Quotulatiousness

August 19, 2009

The Favrapalooza continues

Filed under: Football, Media — Tags: , — Nicholas @ 09:11

Jim Souhan looks at the circus that has taken over the Vikings’ preparation for Friday night’s preseason game:

If you can get past the nagging facts in this story of a 40-year-old, self-absorbed, surgically repaired, still-injured, flipflopping quarterback who shunned training camp and manipulated his way onto the roster of the rival of the team that made him a record-breaking legend, you must come to this realization:

Brett Favre signing with the Minnesota Vikings ranks among most stunning stories in the history of sport.

If you can get past Favre signing a deal worth a potential $25 million and showing up for his introductory news conference looking like the Unabomber, if you can withhold all of the “You might be a redneck…” jokes after seeing him in his cargo shorts, gray stubble and sweat-stained golf cap, you must recognize the uniqueness of this event.

The most iconic quarterback of his generation, a player who mastered the most important and scrutinized position in sports while revitalizing the quaintest franchise in football, in two years maneuvered his way from the team that not too long ago regarded him as a deity to the team that not too long ago regarded him as Diablo.

While I don’t think the story is quite as big as Souhan does, I can’t disagree with this summary:

If Favre fails, the Vikings can’t be faulted for investing money, time and patience in the one position they had failed to upgrade since Childress’ arrival. If Favre succeeds, the Vikings will become the No. 1 story in the No. 1 sport in America. They will sell countless jerseys and tickets, and perhaps even raise the profile of their stadium pursuit in the Legislature.

I’m willing to see Favre succeed in his quest, if only because it would also mean the Vikings will succeed as well. I still mentally picture him wearing the wrong uniform, though.

August 17, 2009

Al Stewart at Hugh’s Room

Filed under: Media — Tags: — Nicholas @ 09:19

This was an unusually musical weekend for me, as I’d heard “The Jailer’s Daughter” on Saturday, and I got to see Al Stewart and Dave Nachmanoff at Hugh’s Room in Toronto yesterday.

It was my first visit to this particular venue, and (as always seems to happen) it took me longer to find it than I’d hoped. I actually passed it twice before noticing it — construction and road closures again figured in the disruption — and found parking a block or so away. The show was scheduled to start at 8:30, so I thought getting there by 6:30 would be more than enough time to get a good seat.

I got the very last table . . . and that only because there’d been a last-minute cancellation. The table was right at the back of the room, so my photography plans were already gang aft agley.

The food was very tasty, the wine list was okay (I ended up with a Chateau des Charmes Gamay Noir), but I’m not as comfortable eating at a tall table: my toes barely touched the ground while sitting on the barstool.

Photography was a bit fraught, as I was too far back from the stage to use my fastest lens or, for that matter, my slowest lens without adding in a 2x teleconverter. In the lighting conditions, using a 80-200mm zoom and the teleconverter, I was surprised any of the shots turned out, frankly (using a flash would only have illuminated a few dozen backs-of-heads, not the stage). I got lots and lots of not-quite-in-focus shots, and lots of nice-composition-ruined-by-camera-shake (hand-held shooting at 1/15s is very much not best practice for photography). By the end of the night, I was so happy to put the camera down . . . even with a light-body SLR, hanging a long lens and extender off the front makes for an awkward and heavy object.

(more…)

August 16, 2009

A visit with The Jailer’s Daughter

Filed under: Cancon, Media — Tags: — Nicholas @ 12:20

The trek to Stratford (or, as some of the locals call it, St. Ratford) took much longer than usual. Between the heavy summer traffic, road closures, and accidents en route, we were well over 3 hours in transit. It was essential that we got there, however, as we were bringing most of the protein for dinner (steak and chicken for 12).

The Jailer’s Daughter (Facebook page) is a new band with Brendan McKenna, Chris Huggins, and Calder McKenna. This was only their third performance, so the play list was necessarily short.

(more…)

August 14, 2009

EFF slaps Burning Man around over “creative lawyering”

Filed under: Law, Liberty, Media — Tags: , — Nicholas @ 13:01

The annual Burning Man event has a reputation for quiet (and sometimes not-so-quiet) anarchy, but this year the event organizers are attempting a quick legal coup:

In a few weeks, tens of thousands of creative people will make their yearly pilgrimage to Nevada’s Black Rock desert for Burning Man, an annual art event and temporary community celebrating radical self expression, self-reliance, creativity and freedom. Most have the entirely reasonable expectation that they will own and control what is likely the largest number of creative works generated on the Playa: the photos they take to document their creations and experiences.

That’s because they haven’t read the Burning Man Terms and Conditions.

Those Terms and Conditions include a remarkable bit of legal sleight-of-hand: as soon as “any third party displays or disseminates” your photos or videos in a manner that the Burning Man Organization (BMO) doesn’t like, those photos or videos become the property of the BMO. This “we automatically own all your stuff” magic appears to be creative lawyering intended to allow the BMO to use the streamlined “notice and takedown” process enshrined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to quickly remove photos from the Internet.

It’s not particularly anarchic to use one of the most restrictive pieces of post-modern fascism legislation to attempt to control the way event attendees use their photographs and video footage.

August 13, 2009

If they won’t voluntarily read lit’rit’cher . . .

Filed under: Books, Media — Tags: , — Nicholas @ 12:47

. . . repackage it as sleaze:

The Valley of Fear

“Years ago, a PI out of Chicago brought justice to a dirty town. Now he’s going to pay,” trumpets the cover copy for US publisher Hard Case Crime’s new take on the classic novel, which it will release in December. “The man needs the help of a great detective … but could even Sherlock Holmes save him now?” The cover shows a scantily clad, backlit blond, reacting in terror to a muscled man showing off a brand on his forearm. Arthur Conan Doyle becomes AC Doyle, “bestselling author of The Lost World”, while the reader is further enticed by the tagline that “They All Answered to… The BODYMASTER!”

Publisher Charles Ardai said he had been looking for a classic novel to “playfully repackage” in Hard Case Crime’s pulp style since he launched the press five years ago, keen to follow in the footsteps of the 1940s and 1950s, which saw a cleavage-revealing cover dreamed up for 1984 (“Forbidden love … Fear … Betrayal”), and a “bosomy lipsticked redhead” on the cover of Frankenstein. “This is the tradition we wanted to revive with our edition of The Valley of Fear — presenting something ‘good for you’ in ‘bad for you’ garb,” he said.

August 11, 2009

Legal FAIL

Filed under: Law, Media, Technology — Tags: , , — Nicholas @ 12:13

Andrew Orlowski shows why Charlie Nesson might as well have been custom-created by the RIAA:

Nesson has achieved something I thought was completely impossible in 2009, and that’s to allow the US recording industry’s lobby group to paint itself in a sympathetic light. No longer must the RIAA explain why their biggest members are not using technology to make money for the people they represent. The Boston case allowed the four major labels to justify an enforcement policy against opponents who appeared compulsively dishonest, irrational, paranoid, and with an abnormal sense of entitlement.

Nice work, Charlie.

Nesson failed in his avowed mission “to put the record industry on trial”. He failed to show why disproportionate statutory damages are harmful, which could have had a lasting constitutional effect. He failed to paint the defendent as sympathetic, or “one of us”. He failed to demonstrate why copyright holders make lousy cops. He even had a Judge noted for her antipathy to the big record labels. In short, he ceded the moral high ground completely and utterly to the plaintiffs, the four major record labels. The labels’ five year campaign against end users is finally at a close, but Nesson’s performance leaves it looking (undeservedly) quite fragrant.

It’s hard to imagine a worse result for anyone except the RIAA . . . they won big, and it’s hard to fault the jury for deciding the way they did . . . Nesson pretty much handed the case to the RIAA on platter:

Nesson could have pointed to the billions of royalties that haven’t been collected by the major labels failure to monetize P2P file sharing. He could have added that the Big Four don’t speak for other parts of the music business in putting Enforcement first. He missed the opportunity to gain the moral and intellectual high ground. Now I’ve no doubt Nesson is sincere in his beliefs that he’s doing everyone a favour, but then again, there’s a bloke on my bus who thinks he’s Napoleon.

Nesson’s case was a misanthropic bundle of intellectual prejudices, a worker’s paradise in which everyone has rights, except creative people. In his Kumbaya world, we’d all be better off, except the people who actually do the art. But once the jury had heard from Tenenbaum — a deeply unpleasant defendant — the die was cast.

The final word, of course, should go to “Weird Al” Yankovic, with his heart-felt, moving “Don’t Download This Song”.

August 5, 2009

Maybe there isn’t a lot of ruin in a nation? Or a civilization?

Filed under: Books, Media, Religion — Tags: , , , , — Nicholas @ 12:47

Adam Smith remarked that there is a great deal of ruin in a nation, but he perhaps was speaking just of economical ruin? In culture, things seem to have the ability to change remarkably quickly … usually in a ruinous direction. Ghost of a Flea looks at an interesting — but depressing — phenomenon:

In less than a generation, we have come to an extraordinary pass. Once right thinking progressives lined up to purchase copies of The Satanic Verses — my first edition sits untouched and unread — and death chanting rioters in Bradford and elsewhere were called out for the barbarians they so manifestly demonstrated themselves to be. It was the thin edge of the wedge. 9/11 worked as it was intended by its authors, sending every weakling into a panic, lashing out at the men on the walls lest they provoke another raid from the borderlands.

These days, Salman Rushdie would most likely be charged with something by a Commission for the Promotion of Human Rights and Prevention of Hatred. In Ireland they would cut to the chase and press criminal charges. Under the new regime, all demons may be mocked save the one pretending to be God.

These Weimar conditions are a hot house for growing hatred against the people they are ostensibly meant to protect.

August 3, 2009

The further abuse of common sense by A.P.

Filed under: Law, Media — Tags: , , — Nicholas @ 11:00

Who ever knew that the Associated Press holds the copyright on the works of Thomas Jefferson?

They tell me I have to use the sentence “exactly as written” and heaven help me if I don’t include the complete footer with their copyright boilerplate. Along the way, their terms of use insisted that I’m not allowed to use Jefferson’s words in connection with “political Content.” Also, I can’t use use his words in any manner or context that will be in any way derogatory” to the AP. As if. Jefferson’s thoughts on copyright are inherently political, and inherently derogatory towards the the AP’s insane position on copyright. I require no license to quote Jefferson. The AP has no right to stop me, no right to demand money from me. All their application does is count words to calculate a fee. It doesn’t even check that the words come from the story being “quoted.”

H/T to Radley Balko

August 1, 2009

Definitely probable

Filed under: Football, Media — Tags: — Nicholas @ 10:48

Vikings wide receiver Bobby Wade kicked up a ruckus with his former team, the Chicago Bears earlier this week. He said that the Bears’ Brian Urlacher had problems with the new Chicago quarterback, Jay Cutler. Jim Souhan has the story, including Wade’s amusing wordmangling:

This is why we love Bobby Wade, now more than ever.

He’s always been a nice guy, a quotable guy, a guy with NFL and life perspective. Friday, while Favre was mulling ankle replacement surgery that could have him taking snaps at Winter Park by Dec. 7, 2010, Wade was giving us something else to talk about.

“It’s something I definitely probably shouldn’t have said,” Wade said.

I disagree. He should be just getting warmed up.

Wednesday, Wade told KFAN Radio that Bears star linebacker Brian Urlacher used a derogatory term to describe new Bears quarterback Jay Cutler. “Pretty much,” Wade said, “[Urlacher] said Jay Cutler was a [bleep] for the most part.”

Cutler begged his way out of Denver when he felt new coach Josh McDaniels was too unwilling to administer total-body massages to his All-Universe quarterback. Since arriving in Chicago, Cutler has been spotted at more bars than Captain Morgan.

Friday, Wade said he shouldn’t have related Urlacher’s insult publicly. What was more interesting was that Wade didn’t retract the statement, didn’t even say that Urlacher is angry with him.

“If I had the opportunity back, I probably wouldn’t have said it,” Wade said. “However, moving forward, it was said, and my communication with Brian is still good, so it is what it is.”

Well, after the way the Green Bay Packers churned the Vikings for the last few months through the Brett Favre melodrama (and got away with it, no blame attached), it’s natural to expect the Vikings want to disrupt some other team. And really, after last season, you’d have to be a truly vicious sadist to want to make things worse for the Detroit Lions (first 0-16 season in NFL history), so the Bears were an obvious choice.

July 28, 2009

Did James Lileks like The Watchmen?

Filed under: Books, Humour, Media — Tags: , — Nicholas @ 12:23

One quote from a fascinating take-down:

. . . it’s a sign of the movie that leaving in the giant squid would have made it less ridiculous.

Haven’t seen the movie myself, although Victor said he liked it.

July 23, 2009

Cointreau . . . suddenly I want a Cointreau

Filed under: Media — Tags: — Nicholas @ 22:07

July 21, 2009

How to respond to a Hugo list kvetch

Filed under: Books, Media — Tags: , — Nicholas @ 16:34

John Scalzi is in fine form:

What makes this an error is the tangential fact Mr. Roberts is a science fiction author himself. Here’s something that we in the kvetching industry like to call a “pro tip”: If you take the time to squat and pinch off a steaming ass-loaf of condescension onto the heads of the people most committed to the genre of literature you happen to write in, you may find they will remember that fact when they see your books in the stores. As in “oh, here’s the book of that guy who thinks my taste in literature sucks.” How motivated does that make the average science fiction fan to buy a book? Well, you know: How motivated would it make you?

Now, I assume Mr. Roberts didn’t intend to come across as arrogant and hectoring to his primary audience, because very few people so willfully attempt to ankle-shoot their own career, even the ones with an academic aerie such as Mr. Roberts possesses. I suspect he believed he was being stern but fair. However, I also suspect that science fiction fandom, not in fact being comprised of students who have to sit for a lecture in order to graduate, may have its own opinions on the matter. In the real world, people don’t like being told, while being gently and paternalistically patted on the head, that they’re goddamned idiots. Especially from someone who then turns around and hopes to sell them a book.

The short form of this is to say that it’s one thing to believe a book on the Hugo shortlist (or, as is the case of Mr. Roberts, all the books on the shortlist) is or are mediocre. It’s another thing entirely as a writer to criticize a reader (and someone you’d presumably like to make your reader) for his or her taste in books. The first of these is perfectly valid; taste is subjective. The second of these makes you look like a jerk to the people upon whom you presumably hope to build your career.

Which is of course perfectly fine, if that’s what you intend to do. I’d just make sure that it is, in fact, what you intend to do.

July 18, 2009

Walter Cronkite

Filed under: Media, USA — Tags: , — Nicholas @ 11:34

I wasn’t really a TV news-watcher during his heyday (actually, it was a habit I’ve pretty much avoided all my life), but Jesse Walker sums up my feelings nicely here:

It [Cronkite running for president] was a joke, of course. But it was a wistful what-if of a joke, and it resonated. Time soon ran letters hailing the idea. “He knows more about national and international problems than any other two candidates put together,” declared one reader, “and, as a duty, I think he would accept the miserable job.” Four years later, the newsman was still fending off suggestions that he run for the office and “make a difference.” Can you imagine anyone spouting such a fantasy about any of our anchors today? Maybe Stewart or Colbert, but not someone who delivers the news with a straight face.

And that’s good. Cronkite’s influence was a product of the three-network era, a time we should be happy to have put behind us. I’m sorry to see the man die, but I’m glad no one was able to fill his shoes.

(Cross-posted to the old blog, http://bolditalic.com/quotulatiousness_archive/005594.html.)

July 15, 2009

QotD: The Matriarchy

Filed under: Media, Quotations — Tags: , , , , , — Nicholas @ 07:29

[Alan Oak]: In a correspondence with feminist scholar Sylvia Kelso, published in Women of Other Worlds (1999), you wrote:

“Where has anyone experienced a matriarchy for test comparison?” you may ask. In fact, most of us have, as children. When the scale of our whole world was one long block long, it was a world dominated and controlled by women. Who were twice our size, drove cars, had money, could hit us if they wanted to and we couldn’t ever hit them back. Hence, at bottom, my deep, deep suspicion of feminism, matriarchy, etc. Does this mean putting my mother in charge of the world, and me demoted to a child again? No thanks, I’ll pass . . .

This leads me to another thought [. . .] Women do desperately need models for power other than the maternal. Nothing is more likely to set any subordinate’s back up, whether they be male or female, than for their boss to come the “mother knows best” routine at them. We need a third place to stand. I’m just not clear how it became my job to supply it.

Lois McMaster Bujold, interviewed by Alan Oak at WomenWriters.net, 2009-06

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress