TheSnakeCharmer
Published on 24 May 2015Game of Thrones is one of the most watched TV shows. Since bagpipes are so Medieval they go really well with the whole Game of Thrones theme song. Watch and Enjoy! Don’t forget to buy the track if you liked it and subscribe please đ
Buy Track :
iTunes – http://apple.co/2xkNBvM
Google play – http://bit.ly/2vaV3so
Also Available on SPOTIFY! – http://spoti.fi/2v2mEjH
—————————————————————————————-
Please support me on Patreon to help me make more videos like this and for me to be able to continue doing music/videos on Youtube. It would mean so much. Please visit the page to see how. https://www.patreon.com/thesnakecharmer
——————————————————————————————
Karan Katiyar – Guitar
Archy J – Bagpipes
——————————————————————————————
Now taking bookings for my act The Snake Charmer – Please email to archyj03@gmail.com
January 26, 2019
Game of Thrones Bagpipe Cover – TheSnakeCharmer (Theme Song)
January 2, 2019
In non-breaking, non-news … politicians lie
Hector Dummond explains why what might seem like a shocking revelation from a former Thatcher MP isn’t even getting a raised eyebrow from the British media:
In a highly revealing article former MP Matthew Parris admits that the Conservative Party would often lie so that it could do what it wanted. And when it didnât lie it fudged and avoided issues in order to prevent the âpeopleâ having any say in the countryâs governance:
our challenge was to find ways of ducking the issue. Once I became an MP, I did so by voting for the principle and against the practice. This subversion of democracy (in Theresa Mayâs phrase) caused me embarrassment, but not a secondâs guilt. Sod democracy: hanging was wrong âŠ
Among ourselves we talked cheerfully about subterfuge. The Britain of 1979 and 1983 most emphatically did not vote for a massive confrontation with the coal miners. We made sure the electorate was never asked.
These candid admissions have been completely ignored by the media. One reason theyâve been ignored is, of course, that most people have come to work this out for themselves, so Parris isnât telling us anything we donât already know. But surely hearing it from the horseâs mouth has great value? Why hasnât the media splashed on this? Why havenât Parrisâs old enemies in the Labour party made hay with it?
The main reason is that most of the media, and virtually all the Labour party, is on his side over this. Even newspapers like the Guardian. You might think the Guardian would be the natural enemy of a former Tory MP, especially one who worked with Thatcher, and certainly on some issues they will regard Parris as an enemy, but the fact is that the Guardian wants government to be free of restraint by the people, because its vision of the state involves a leftist government getting into power, imposing its own ideology onto society and removing the power for the people to have a democratic say from most areas of life. So it can hardly criticise Parris for having done what it longs to do. It doesnât want to bring about anything that might lessen the freedom government currently has to ignore the voter.
In violation of Betteridge’s law of headlines, this question can clearly be answered “yes!”
A few days back, Ted Campbell posted under the title “Is it time to get rid of the CBC? Should we?” Betteridge’s law says the answer should be “no”, but in this case the answer is more like “Why haven’t we sold that thing off already?”:
OK, the source of this cringeworthy video clip, Rebel Media, may be suspect to many ~ I do not follow them ~ but it does bring up a question: is this what we expect for the $1 Billion plus we pay for the CBC?
The complete interview, which I watched. looks, as someone else said, more like an advertisement for one of those online dating sites than news. It certainly caused a small storm about the CBCâs bias ⊠which, in this case, especially when compared to CBC journalistsâ question and comments directed to e.g. Andrew Scheer and Maxime Bernier, seems over the top, even by the CBCâs standards. And that begs the question: is the CBC living up to its mandate? The Broadcasting Act says (§3(1)(d)(i), inter alia, that âThe Canadian broadcasting system should serve to safeguard, enrich and strengthen the cultural, political, social and economic fabric of Canada.â I suspect that someone will want to make a case that the CBC, as a network, at least in itâs English language ânewsâ services, has crossed a line and looks too much like a 24 hour a day informercial for the Laurentian Consensus as represented by the Liberal Party of Canada.
[…]
What does the CBC do? Basically it provides, in both English and French, three services:
- Radio Canada International ~ this is Canadaâs voice to the world, it is, today, entirely on the internet. In 2012 the Harper government imposed a 10% cut on CBC/Radio Canada ~ then CBC/Radio Canada decide that RCI, which is little known, would have its budget cut by 80% from $12+ Million to just over $2 Million. That ended the era of RCIâs shortwave, world wide service. It was a criminally stupid decision that, in my considered, professional opinion, should have caused the government of the day to summarily dismiss the entire CBC/Radio Canada Board and all of the most senior managers for cause. Every country needs a âvoice,â RCI was ours ⊠the gold standard for international broadcasting is found in the BBC World Service and Deutsche Welle, both still provides near global coverage using nearly jam-proof shortwave and satellite radio stations. Both, of course, make extensive and intensive use of the internet;
- CBC Radio ~ CBC Radio has a big, integrated network of stations covering most of Canada. You can see a list of transmitters on their web site. If you live in Arctic Bay, in Nunavut, population 850±, you are served by radio station CKAB-FM which is a community-owned CBC North rebroadcaster that gets its programming from CFFB in Iqaluit; if you live in Prince Rupert, BC, your are served by CBC Radio 1 (a national network which has a mix of local, regonal and national programmes) broadcasting on 860 KHz and if you live in Shilo, MB you are also served by CBC Radio 1 on FM from Brandon, the people in Twillingate, NL are served, again by Radio 1 from Grand Falls which is rebroadcast on 90.7 MHz from a transmitter in Botswood. In short, CBC Radio is doing a first rate job of serving most Canadians, even if you find some of the content banal and biased. I think it is, by and large, money well spent because in many, many, many communities the CBC provides the only news and weather; but
- CBC Television is, in my opinion, a near total waste of taxpayerâs money. As you can see from this list (you have to select the province you want) the CBC has only 14 English language TV broadcast stations which serve about 25 urban âmarketsâ and serves less than 10% of the Canadian market in prime time. (Rex Murphy, in a talk to the Manning Centre, quipped about the low audience levels of the CBC at about the 2â50â mark.) It used to have hundreds of transmitters providing near national coverage but in 2012, when Canada converted to digital TV, it closed all but 14 because only a tiny number (certainly less than 5%, likely less than 2%) of Canadians want to watch CBC and do not have cable or internet access. Electing to not serve Canadians with many, many local TV stations was a smart business decision because, as you can see from this listing, Canadians from Kamloops, through Kenora and on to Halifax and St. Johnâs are served by other networks.
I think that Radio Canada International should be upgraded; CBC Radio should remain about the same, government funded and commercial free, and CBC TV should be closed, completely and the money saved should be used to directly subsidize TV, film and radio production in Canada based on Canadian content rules: n% for the production company being Canadians and using Canadian studios, x% for using Canadian talent ~ on screen and in in the studio, y% for using Canadian locations and so on.
Some, at least half, I suspect, of the CBCâs 14 television licences will sell, at auction, for a tidy sum, making room for new, innovative, probably ethnic, services in larger cities ~ Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto and Montreal and a couple of others. The CBCâs excellent production facilities will also sell for a good sum to private entrepreneurs who will then host dozens of independent radio and TV programme producers. Thereâs nothing wrong with Canadian production values and in a more open market I suspect that Canadian drama, public affairs, education and political commentary programmes can survive and even thrive, each on its own merits.
December 21, 2018
Repost – The Monkees – “Riu Chiu” HD (Official Music Video)
Uploaded on 15 Dec 2015
The Monkees perform “Riu Chiu” from Episode 47, “The Monkees’ Christmas Show”.
H/T to Kathy Shaidle for the link.
December 15, 2018
Season 3 of The Grand Tour to be the final one
The TV trio of James May, Richard Hammond and Jeremy Clarkson are giving up the show after the third season, due to begin in January, and will instead move on to “Hollywood budget” specials on Amazon Prime:
An emotional Jeremy Clarkson has revealed he will walk away from the studio car shows that helped turn him into a household name following the third series of The Grand Tour.
The outspoken presenter, 58, will give up on the traditional format employed by the hugely popular Amazon show and long-running BBC flagship Top Gear after more than 17 years.
However, fans needn’t be alarmed since Clarkson – joined by co-hosts Richard Hammond and James May – has inked a new deal with Amazon Prime for a fourth series of the show in a brand new format.
[…]
‘Itâs a really sad day,’ Clarkson later told The Sun. ‘I will miss the banter with each other and with the audience. But weâve been doing that show for effectively 17 years â sitting around in studios, watching cars race around the track.’
He added: ‘We all agreed that weâve been doing it a long time and everything eventually runs its course. Besides, Iâm 58 and Iâm too fat to be climbing on to the stage.’
Clarkson, Hammond and May will now focus on a series of extravagant, big-budget specials over the next two years that will take them away from their usual studio environment.
I’m far from a petrol-head, but I’ve been a fan of Clarkson/Hammond/May for several years, and I still barely know anything about cars…
November 24, 2018
November 23, 2018
QotD: Inactivist bumper stickers
Iâve received several hundred suggestions for inactivist bumper-sticker slogans and, as befits the situation, Iâve been slow to read them. Still, I like some of them quite a bit:
Visualize me ignoring you.
How about âletâs not.â
Donât honk if you canât be bothered.
Donât Act, NOW!
If not now, whenever.
Leave well enough alone
Slacking: Itâs not just for kids.
YOU Save the Whales!
Practice Random Acts of Self-Restraint.
Ask Not.
Future Site of Political Statement.And so on.
But thereâs a problem. Many readers segued too easily from celebrating inactivism to championing outright sloth. For example, âPractice Random Acts of Self-Restraintâ is a fine inactive motto. But âThey can have my channel changer when they pry it out of my cold, dead hand,â while very funny is off point. âDonât Mess With Stasis,â doesnât quite rhyme but itâs got the right idea. âThink globally, act loafally,â meanwhile, has the wrong idea â except insofar as it mocks people with stupid bumper stickers.
The funny thing is that inactivists are actually very active people. I would bet that â this is a broad generalization-the folks who find inactivism politically appealing probably work harder and are more successful then people who find conventional activism attractive. Inactivists didnât boycott the Million Mom March simply because they had better things to do. They stayed home because they believe the Million Mom March was a vast, peripatetic parade of propaganda. Inactivists donât fail to mobilize solely because weâd rather watch a rerun of Matlock than chant for vegetable rights and peace at city hall. We actually donât believe in vegetable rights. We want our carrots to remain as chattel.
I agree that sloth is funny. And I suppose thatâs why so many people want Homer Simpson to become the inactivist spokesperson. I laugh whenever I hear Homer Simpson speak admiringly of Teamsters: âOh, I always wanted to be a Teamster. So lazy and surly⊠mind if I relax next to you?â And his campaign slogan when he ran for garbage commissioner was pretty good. âCanât someone else do it?â The best line from that episode was when he told Springfield voters âAnimals are crapping in our houses and weâre picking it up! Did we lose a war?â But still, Homerâs wrong when he tells his kids âYou tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is: Never try.â
Jonah Goldberg, “Let History Come To You”, National Review, 2002-07-24.
November 22, 2018
This is why tax cuts are always criticized for benefitting the rich
Rebecca Zeines and Jon Miltimore explain why newspaper headlines and TV anchors always seem to decry any tax cut as being disproportionally beneficial to the wealthy:
But crucial facts are often missing in these articles. As a recent Bloomberg piece explained, two key points tend to be overlooked in articles written by media outlets and progressive tax proponents:
- The top 1 percent paid a greater share of individual income taxes (37.3 percent) than the bottom 90 percent combined (30.5 percent).
- The top 50 percent of all taxpayers paid 97 percent of total individual income taxes.
These numbers date back to 2016 but remain applicable in 2018.
These data show that the bottom 50 percent of US taxpayers paid just 3 percent of total income taxes in 2016, while the top 50 percent accounted for 97 percent.
Here is a wonderful visual representation of this dynamic, courtesy of Mark Perry of the American Enterprise Institute:
There is a clear correlation between economic freedom and prosperity, and tax climate is a key component of economic freedom.
Economist Dan Mitchell explains it best: Heavy taxation destroys entrepreneurship. The more money is taxed out of the private sector, the less is available for investment, development, and worker compensation (recall that after Trumpâs tax bill was enacted, many businesses raised workersâ wages and offered bonuses).
Efforts to improve Americaâs tax climate are consistently and predictably derided as tax cuts for âthe rich.â But, as the above diagram shows, itâs quite impossible to offer people a comparatively huge tax cut when theyâre paying a comparatively tiny percentage of income taxes.
November 2, 2018
What cable news has devolved into
The great American philosopher @iowahawk on the degraded state of cable news programming:
October 8, 2018
The tyranny of testosterone, or why we shouldn’t lie to our kids
Sarah Hoyt, in the latest Libertarian Enterprise tries to talk to young women about the biological reality and how to avoid being fooled by Hollywood fantasy:
Myself and accomplice, neither of us fainting maidens, first went to the cabinet store, and found that cabinets we could barely move with much effort between the two of us were hefted around effortlessly by teenage employee who probably weighed all of 90 lbs and therefore less than either of us, and had arms like boiled spaghetti, but who had the blessings of testosterone making him much stronger than either of us.
I first ran into this with younger son, who at fourteen looked like a twig which I could have broken over my knee (heâd just grown two feet over the previous year, going from a foot shorter than I to a foot taller. This was also the year in which I was unreasonable and would turn around when he came in the room and say âshower, nowâ even though heâd already showered twice that day. I.e. to quote our old neighbor âthat poor boy is being beaten with a stick made of testosterone. Mothers of boys will get it. At least mothers of boys who went through growth spurt from hell.) We went to the store to get cement to repair a crack in a garden path. The bags were 100 lbs. I tried to lift it and (partly because it was at foot-level and was an awkward floppy bulk) just couldnât budge it.
Younger son gave the theatrical teenage sigh, reached past me, grabbed the bag and threw it into our shopping cart, leaving me open-mouthed in surprise.
So every time 90 lb girl beats a 300 lb trained fighter on TV remember that. And for the love of heaven explain to your daughters that itâs play fantasy. The daughter of old friends of ours has fallen for this hook line and sinker and was telling older son she could beat him. Older son actually has muscles (he was the one who helped me renovate two Victorians from the ground up and build two balconies. He also does all the sawing by hand.) Heâs six one but projects taller. He also happens to be built like a brick ****house, as the men on my side of the family are. (As a little girl I keep insisting my cousins were wardrobes. If you think of the old fashioned wardrobe, seven feet tall and six feet wide, thatâs the impression they projected.) That poor girl is five five and skinny for her height. She couldnât even push older son back if he decided to stand still. She MIGHT be able to fend him off long enough to run away, if she fought like a cornered cat and gouged eyes and bit (Iâve done something like that in similar circumstances, but thereâs a reason Iâm never without a weapon.) but thatâs about it.
Watching her brag to my least excitable, very patient son who just sighed and didnât even bother contradicting her, I thought how lucky she was in her choice of male to annoy. But if she keeps it up, sooner or later her luck will run out.
We shouldnât lie to the young, and all our fiction and most of our movies lie about what women can and canât do, all in the name of âthere is no difference between men and women.â (âExcept men are defective womenâ is implied.)
October 3, 2018
QotD: The state of American journalism
Back in the day, reporters (they didn’t insist on being called “journalists” back then) were told that the way to frame their stories was to answer a series of questions which boiled down to:
- who
- what
- when
- where
- why
- how
The emphasis was on actual facts and objectivity. But now, with “advocacy journalism” having completely taken over the J-schools and pretty much every newsroom, the emphasis is on changing the world rather than reporting a story fairly and accurately. Especially now, when no less a paper than the New York Times announced before the election that Trump is so bad that objectivity should be thrown out. So the who, what, when, where, why, and how questions were changed into:
- who (can we quote to damage Trump)
- what (can we publish to damage Trump)
- when (should we run it maximize damage to Trump)
- where (do we get more material to damage Trump)
- why (Donald Trump’s presidency is an existential threat to America and to the world)
- how (can we write our stories so as to cause maximum damage to Trump)
Ladies and gentlemen, this is the state of journalism, 2018.
OregonMuse, “The Morning Rant”, Ace of Spades H.Q., 2018-09-12.
September 4, 2018
How do plasma TVs work? I James May Q&A I Head Squeeze
BBC Earth Lab
Published on 18 Oct 2013So how do plasma TV’s work? Believe it or not the concept of plasma displays had been invented as long ago as the 1930’s, Not quite 21st cutting edge technology! The idea is that instead of using electrons to create lines, the plasma screen uses three fluorescent light cells, one in each primary colour.
Plasma displays are considerably shallower than older TVs, you can mount them on a wall and conveniently hide them behind a well-placed curtain. They can also be scaled up by adding more pixels and enough power to run them. The biggest plasma TV we found was a 152 inch! That’s pretty much 3 meters long and will set you back a measly ÂŁ380,000.
I bet your TV is not as big as 152 inches! If you enjoyed this vid then why not give us a thumbs up or share it with your friends.
August 12, 2018
QotD: Journalism
Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.
David Burge (@iowahawkblog), Twitter, 2013-05-09.
July 13, 2018
QotD: Decline of the mainstream media
What happened to that instinct to go find the story that the âpowers that beâ wanted buried? Yeah, I know how the Internet has slashed into the paid-advertising model that supported âobjectiveâ daily newspapers. But donât you think the ongoing loss of audience and credibility of the âlegacy mediaâ might also have something to do with the fact their little drones now all recite the âLeftist lineâ in unison â never challenge any of the sacred cows?
That what remains of the American and European ânews mediaâ would become captive to the screeching Collectivist/Globalist Left was predictable. First our colleges and now even the government youth propaganda camps (âpublic high schoolsâ) have been captive to unionized Leftists pushing a thinly disguised Marxist agenda â Franz Fanon, Noam Chomsky and the like â for 45 years now. Public schools which quite purposely turn out graduates who are just barely literate enough to follow their marching orders, by the way, with most of a troublemakerâs innate sense of curiosity long since ground out of them.
(Real research is such a grind. We SO much more prefer the classes where we get good grades for just shouting our opinions about racism and oppression and stuff. And now we even get a free field trip to the state Capitol to shout it out for gun control! ⊠even though we wouldnât know a muzzle brake from a stripper clip, and couldnât tell you who wrote the Bill of Rights or why he (or they) believed a citizenry armed with military-grade weapons is somehow ânecessary to the security of a free state.â ⊠Or even where that phrase appears.)
With the exception of a few pretty network news readers with great hair, no one ever went into journalism for the money. The sense since Woodward and Bernstein took down Richard Nixon was that journalists had a mission to take down greedy white âdeplorableâ politicians (and if we canât find any, weâll invent some. âIf youâre for enforcing the existing immigration laws like every other nation on earth, youâre a racist!â)
The problem is not just a political âleaning.â The problem is that todayâs crop of journalists are so incurious it never occurs to them to notice that their assignment editors are taking orders from owners and publishers who are on the same globalist/mind-control team as virtually all of those bought-and-paid-for politicians theyâre supposed to be âexposing.â The big corporate guys donât really care which politicians get taken down, since theyâve bought the âDâs AND the âRâs â they own Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi AND Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham and Trey Gowdy. Itâs Kabuki, itâs a Punch-and-Judy show to make people feel theyâve got a real choice.
Vin Suprynowicz, “On Reporters Who Ask No (Unapproved) Questions”, Libertarian Enterprise, 2018-06-03.
June 17, 2018
Blackmailing the Bishop – Blackadder – BBC
BBC Comedy Greats
Published on 11 Jan 2010The baby-eating Bishop of Bath and Wells comes to collect a debt, but finds himself the victim of a fiendish plot.






