Quotulatiousness

June 6, 2022

Dr. Mengele Takes Command – WAH 063 – June 5, 1943

World War Two
Published 5 Jun 2022

Despair in Germany, more death in the Jewish ghettos, and Dr. Mengele tales command in Auschwitz-Birkenau.

Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/TimeGhostHistory
Or join The TimeGhost Army directly at: https://timeghost.tv

Get Collectibles here: https://timeghost.tv/collectibles/​

Follow WW2 day by day on Instagram @ww2_day_by_day – https://www.instagram.com/ww2_day_by_day
Follow Timeghost History on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/timeghosthistory
Join us on Reddit – https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldWarTwoChannel/
Between 2 Wars: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…

Source list: http://bit.ly/WW2sources

Archive footage: Screenocean/Reuters – https://www.screenocean.com

Hosted by: Spartacus Olsson
Director: Astrid Deinhard
Producers: Astrid Deinhard and Spartacus Olsson
Executive Producers: Astrid Deinhard, Indy Neidell, Spartacus Olsson
Creative Producer: Marek Kamiński
Community Management: Ian Sowden
Written by: Spartacus Olsson and Joram Appel
Research by: Joram Appel
Map animations by: Daniel Weiss
Map research by: Sietse Kenter
Edited by: Iryna Dulka
Artwork and color grading by: Mikołaj Uchman
Sound design by: Marek Kamiński
Colorizations by:
Mikołaj Uchman
Norman Stewart – https://oldtimesincolor.blogspot.com/

Image sources:
Otto Hoffmann, Horst Holfort (J. Holfort)
IWM [MOI] FLM 1796, FRE 8467, C 4713, CH 9818, CH 9720, B 9562, 10AO9
Yad Vashem 1597-221, 140EO2, FA159/A225, 8409-3, 3909/71, 10FO8

Soundtracks from Epidemic Sound:
“Ominous” – Philip Ayers
“Blunt Object” – Farrell Wooten
“Not Safe Yet” – Gunnar Johnsen
“Spy Game” – Jon Sumner
“Firebreak” – Edward Karl Hanson
“Dark Beginning” – Johan Hynynen
“Barrel” – Christian Andersen
“Secret Cargo” – Craft Case

A TimeGhost chronological documentary produced by OnLion Entertainment GmbH.

From the comments:

World War Two
12 hours ago

Join the TimeGhost Army: https://bit.ly/WAH_063_PI

In the conclusion to the video, I use Jozef Mengele, and Arthur Harris as examples of individuals who made decisions in this war that deliberately and consciously killed innocent people. That is not to say that they were the same.

Mengele was a special kind of monster, who took great pleasure in personally torturing, maiming, and killing children. Arthur Harris was “just a military decision maker” who sat behind a desk and created policy that was specifically engineered to create immense suffering and cost innocent lives. While that makes them vastly different in method, and on the scale of personal monstrosity, they are similar in their justification.

While Harris might be a lesser evil, in 2022 the world is outraged and disgusted when the Russian military applies the same methods against Ukraine that RAF Bomber command did in WW2. Perhaps we think that’s not the same because after all, the Ukrainians are innocent … but can children and infants be guilty of anything, even if their parents are Nazis?

My point is, and my point remains; if you do not fight wars by the ethical standards of just war, you have stepped out on a slippery slope that ends in the terrible valley where Dr. Mengele resides.

You might then ask yourself what could the United Nations Alliance have done differently than bomb Germany and Japan to smithereens? It’s a complicated question. The war winning effect of the campaigns is debatable, but more importantly if we’re going to learn anything from it for the future we have to look at the morals and ethics of conflict.

The idea of “just war” – I.e. a war waged within an ethical framework that makes it morally justifiable has been around across civilizations for as long as we have records of conflict. With the advent of The Hague conferences in 1897 and 1907, but especially after WW2 we have started progressing towards a common international understanding of what “just war” means. Within that ethical framework a very restrictive view on casualty ratios is emerging.

Basically (oversimplified) the idea is as follows; you’re only justified to wage war as a defensive action in order to save lives. When doing do you need to err on the side of caution, so that the lethal casualties you inflict are many times fewer than the lives you save. In modern understanding even includes enemy military casualties. There is of course no exact ratio, but this idea is today taught at military academies in most countries of the free world.

If you look at the War in Ukraine, you can see this played out in real time, both negatively and positively. The Russian military is blatantly disregarding these guidelines, while the Ukrainian military is doing their best to adhere to them (by for instance not counter striking into Russia and Belarus in such ways that they risk civilian casualties). Most significantly, the idea of limiting potential casualties is a red thread throughout the response to the conflict.

Not only are the countries providing support to Ukraine trying to avoid direct escalation with Russia, they are also selecting arms systems, providing intelligence, and holding Ukraine accountable in such a way that casualties are focused on the Russian military. There’s no guarantee that it will stay that way of course, but so far Ukraines defense response to aggression is a textbook case for bellum iustum (the formal term for “just war”).

Spartacus

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress