Quotulatiousness

December 7, 2025

The great military leaders of the past have been … quirky

Filed under: Bureaucracy, History, Military, USA — Tags: , , , — Nicholas @ 03:00

On the social media site formerly known as Twitter, @InfantryDort considers the clear evidence that most of the greatest generals of history were, at the very least, eccentric:

Most real post I’ve seen all month.

Yes, the process weeds them out.

Until all that remains is some corporatized astroturfed version of … whatever.

Military commanders in the modern era MUST lack personal audacity to some degree. Almost without exception.

Because audacity is “dangerous”. It can be unpredictable. And this is a bad thing in a world obsessed with safety and predictability.

But a military without it, is just one on anti-depressants. You never feel the highest highs or the lowest lows.

You just … exist, in inspirational purgatory.

So you will never see a Napoleon, Patton, Allen, or Sherman ever again.

Their modern equivalents mostly got out as captains because the experience they were promised from history, is now covered in bubble wrap. Wearing a bib and a football helmet.

The modern military is devoid of both victory and defeat. A victory you aren’t allowed to win. A defeat you can explain away. Much of it is due to the American people themselves, and their disdain for violence. At least violence against what sane people classify as enemies.

We have a chance to take it back. A chance to return to glorious and sometimes unhinged leadership. But the rot is thick. And the Empire Strikes Back daily.

My infinite gratitude, and the gratitude of a fawning nation, will rest with those who display the force of will to make it happen.

And crush the corporatization of military leadership once and for all.

The world awaits. And one wonders if our country has the appetite for it all, short of an existential crisis in a war of national survival.

Update, 8 December: Welcome, Instapundit readers! Please do have a look around at some of my other posts you may find of interest. I send out a daily summary of posts here through my Substackhttps://substack.com/@nicholasrusson that you can subscribe to if you’d like to be informed of new posts in the future.

5 Comments

  1. […] THE GREATEST EVERYTHING IN HISTORY HAVE BEEN… QUIRKY:  The great military leaders of the past have been … quirky. […]

    Pingback by Instapundit » Blog Archive » THE GREATEST EVERYTHING IN HISTORY HAVE BEEN… QUIRKY:  The great military leaders of the past ha — December 8, 2025 @ 03:43

  2. Time will tell if it is wise, but many of the people screaming about Trump’s disdain for our current military leaders are probably clueless about the fact that FDR spent the run-up to WW2 weeding out leadership that was not up to the job of a real war. I don’t think Eisenhower had any stars prior to 1939 or 1940, Marshall may have had one, King was only a Vice Admiral in 1938.

    Comment by Steve — December 8, 2025 @ 09:55

  3. And even after that culling, American military and naval leaders were fired at a great rate once US forces were in contact with the enemy. You can make a case that they fired too many for mistakes rather than incompetence, but even the Germans noted that the US forces got better very quickly once they were blooded.

    Comment by Nicholas — December 8, 2025 @ 11:22

  4. I am reminded of Sherman’s description of his relationship with Grant. It went something like: he stood by me when I was crazy and I stood by him when he was drunk.

    Comment by Richard — December 8, 2025 @ 12:39

  5. Attributed to Abraham Lincoln:

    Well, I wish some of you would tell me the brand of whiskey that Grant drinks. I would like to send a barrel of it to my other generals.

    Comment by Nicholas — December 8, 2025 @ 15:03

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress