I come now not to explain Wilson, but to hate him. A national consensus on hating Wilson is long overdue. It is the patriotic duty of every decent American. While conservatives have particular reasons to detest Wilson, and all his works, and all his empty promises, there is more than enough in his record for moderates, liberals, progressives, libertarians, and socialists to join us in this great and unifying cause.
The roll call of the worst presidents in American history includes some consensus top choices. James Buchanan and Franklin Pierce both contributed mightily to the nation’s slide into the Civil War, and Andrew Johnson did enduring harm to Reconstruction in the war’s aftermath. But all three of those men were repudiated by the end of their single term in office. They left no heirs who would acknowledge their influence, no fleet of academic hagiographers who could see themselves reflected in those presidencies.
Wilson, by contrast, served two full and consequential terms. He was the only Democrat re-elected to the job during the century between 1832 and 1936. He was lionized by liberals and progressives in academia and the media for most of the century after he left office in 1921. In my youth, and perhaps yours, Wilson was presented in history books as a tragic hero whom the unthinking American people didn’t deserve. He was often placed highly on academics’ rankings of the presidents. Princeton University named its school of international relations for him. Even in rescinding that honor in June 2020, the university’s press release declared: “Though scholars disagree about how to assess Wilson’s tenure as president of the United States, many rank him among the nation’s greatest leaders and credit him with visionary ideas that shaped the world for the better.”
Nah. Wilson was a human pile of flaming trash. He was a bad man who made the country and the world worse. His name should be an obscenity, his image an effigy. Hating him is a wholesome obligation of citizenship.
Dan McLaughlin, “The Hater’s Guide to Woodrow Wilson”, National Review, 2022-03-16.
June 24, 2022
QotD: “[Woodrow] Wilson was a human pile of flaming trash”
2 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
The only Woodrow Wilson bit of note that mattered was that he was the namesake of Woodrow Wilson Smith, AKA Lazarus Long, of Heinlein’s works. Who, somewhat appropriately, banged his own mother during the Wilson administration with his younger self in the backseat…
Comment by Basara549 — June 24, 2022 @ 15:24
Yep. I enjoyed reading most of the “Lazarus Long” sub-portion of the Future Histories, but that particular section seemed … unusually self-indulgent (and for late Heinlein, that’s really saying something!)
Comment by Nicholas — June 24, 2022 @ 15:30