There is a real and growing prospect of an all-out trade war being waged in the name of climate change.
The struggle to generate international agreement on a carbon deal has created a desire to punish “free riders” who do not sign on to stringent carbon emission reduction targets. But the greater goals seem to be to barricade imports from China and India, to tax companies that outsource, and to go for short-term political benefits, destroying free trade.
This is a massive mistake. Economic models show that the global benefits of even slightly freer trade are in the order of $50 trillion — 50 times more than we could achieve, in the best of circumstances, with carbon cuts. If trade becomes less free, we could easily lose $50 trillion — or much more if we really bungle things. Poor nations — the very countries that will experience the worst of climate damage — would suffer most.
In other words: In our eagerness to avoid about $1 trillion worth of climate damage, we are being asked to spend at least 50 times as much — and, if we hinder free trade, we are likely to heap at least an additional $50 trillion loss on the global economy.
Bjorn Lomborg, “Costly Carbon Cuts: Proposed Strategies Would Hurt the Most Vulnerable”, The Washington Post, 2009-09-28
September 28, 2009
QotD: Gambling on CO2 reduction
1 Comment
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
[…] similar to this (size will depend on your handlebar), a piece of inner tube and a 1/4 x 20 bolt. QotD: Gambling on CO2 reduction – quotulatiousness.ca 09/28/2009 There is a real and growing prospect of an all-out trade war being […]
Pingback by COACHEP » Blog Archive » Posts about Junk Science as of September 28, 2009 — September 29, 2009 @ 01:46