{"id":9770,"date":"2011-06-11T12:12:27","date_gmt":"2011-06-11T16:12:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=9770"},"modified":"2011-06-11T12:12:27","modified_gmt":"2011-06-11T16:12:27","slug":"redefining-high-speed-as-45-mph","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2011\/06\/11\/redefining-high-speed-as-45-mph\/","title":{"rendered":"Redefining &#8220;high speed&#8221; as 45 mph"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/washingtonexaminer.com\/blogs\/beltway-confidential\/2011\/06\/latest-high-speed-45-mph-rail-project\" target=\"_blank\">This<\/a> is very amusing, unless you&#8217;re a taxpayer:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The latest in lunacy in high-speed rail lunacy: at Joel Kotkin\u2019s newgeography.com Wendell Cox reports  that the U.S. Transportation Department is dangling money before the government of Iowa seeking matching funds from the state for a high-speed rail line from Iowa City to Chicago. The \u201chigh-speed\u201d trains would average 45 miles per hour and take five hours to reach Chicago from Iowa City. One might wonder how big the market for this service is, since Iowa City and Johnson County have only 130,882 people; add in adjoining Linn County (Cedar Rapids) and you\u2019re only up to 342,108 &mdash; not really enough, one would think, to supply enough riders to cover operating costs much less construction costs.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The federal government must be getting desperate to find some state willing to take this deal . . .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is very amusing, unless you&#8217;re a taxpayer: The latest in lunacy in high-speed rail lunacy: at Joel Kotkin\u2019s newgeography.com Wendell Cox reports that the U.S. Transportation Department is dangling money before the government of Iowa seeking matching funds from the state for a high-speed rail line from Iowa City to Chicago. The \u201chigh-speed\u201d trains [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,84,15],"tags":[372,185,719],"class_list":["post-9770","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-government","category-technology","tag-chicago","tag-highspeedrail","tag-iowa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-2xA","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9770","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9770"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9770\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9771,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9770\/revisions\/9771"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9770"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}