{"id":97088,"date":"2025-08-12T05:00:54","date_gmt":"2025-08-12T09:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=97088"},"modified":"2025-08-11T18:10:04","modified_gmt":"2025-08-11T22:10:04","slug":"britain-warns-online-platforms-about-overzealous-interpretation-of-online-safety-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2025\/08\/12\/britain-warns-online-platforms-about-overzealous-interpretation-of-online-safety-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Britain warns online platforms about &#8220;overzealous&#8221; interpretation of online safety law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Ben the Layabout&#8221; posted a note over at <em>Founding Questions<\/em> linking to a <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/AOBxB\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Telegraph<\/em> article<\/a> [archive.ph link] that seems to indicate the British government is demanding that online services both enforce the letter of the law <em>and<\/em> the spirit &#8230; whatever that might mean at any given moment in time:<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_49979\" style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/Palace-of-Westminster-by-michaelhenley-CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-49979\" style=\"float:right; padding: 0px 0px 10px 25px\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/Palace-of-Westminster-by-michaelhenley-CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0-480x320.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"480\" height=\"320\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-49979\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/Palace-of-Westminster-by-michaelhenley-CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0-480x320.jpg 480w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/Palace-of-Westminster-by-michaelhenley-CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/Palace-of-Westminster-by-michaelhenley-CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/Palace-of-Westminster-by-michaelhenley-CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0-853x569.jpg 853w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/Palace-of-Westminster-by-michaelhenley-CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-49979\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/7159377@N02\/2923386680\">&#8220;Palace of Westminster&#8221;<\/a><span>by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/7159377@N02\">michaelhenley<\/a><\/span> is licensed under <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/?ref=ccsearch&#038;atype=html\" style=\"margin-right: 5px;\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/?ref=ccsearch&#038;atype=html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"display: inline-block;white-space: none;opacity: .7;margin-top: 2px;margin-left: 3px;height: 22px !important;\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;\" src=\"https:\/\/search.creativecommons.org\/static\/img\/cc_icon.svg\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;\" src=\"https:\/\/search.creativecommons.org\/static\/img\/cc-by_icon.svg\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;\" src=\"https:\/\/search.creativecommons.org\/static\/img\/cc-nc_icon.svg\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;\" src=\"https:\/\/search.creativecommons.org\/static\/img\/cc-sa_icon.svg\" \/><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<blockquote><p>Social media giants face huge fines for curbing free speech by <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/o\/AOBxB\/https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/2025\/07\/31\/my-online-safety-act-isnt-the-problem-labour-is\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;overzealous&#8221; enforcement of online safety laws<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Ministers have told platforms including Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok they must not restrict access to posts that express lawfully held views.<\/p>\n<p>The warning, in an apparent change of tone from ministers, comes amid a backlash over websites blocking users from viewing material, including parliamentary debates about grooming gangs.<\/p>\n<p>Campaigners have said that free speech is threatened by the Government&#8217;s application of the <em>Online Safety Act<\/em>, which is meant to protect children from harmful content.<\/p>\n<p>JD Vance, the US vice-president, used a visit to the UK this week to warn ministers against going down the <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/o\/AOBxB\/https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/us\/news\/2025\/07\/30\/white-house-warns-starmer-tech-online-safety-bill\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;dark path&#8221; of censorship<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Whitehall sources have expressed concern that social media firms, some of which have criticised the law, &#8220;have been overzealous&#8221; in enforcing it and must be &#8220;mindful&#8221; of the right to freedom of expression.<\/p>\n<p>The Science Department, which oversees the legislation, told companies they could face fines if they failed to uphold free speech rules.<\/p>\n<p>A spokesman said:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<p><em>As well as <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/o\/AOBxB\/https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/2025\/07\/17\/adam-aleksic-etymologynerd-algospeak-secret-language\/\" target=\"_blank\">legal duties to keep children safe<\/a>, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10 per cent of global revenue or \u00a318m, whichever is greater.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/o\/AOBxB\/https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/business\/2025\/07\/29\/political-censors-cynically-hijacked-vital-child-protection\/\" target=\"_blank\">most serious risks to children<\/a> such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>So online sites big and small are required to obey the British law, but only as and how the British government <em>wants<\/em> it enforced or they&#8217;ll levy massive punishment. Too lax? Punishment. Too strict? Also punishment. It&#8217;s almost as if Britain <em>wants<\/em> to be cut off from the rest of the internet &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Ben the Layabout&#8221; posted a note over at Founding Questions linking to a Telegraph article [archive.ph link] that seems to indicate the British government is demanding that online services both enforce the letter of the law and the spirit &#8230; whatever that might mean at any given moment in time: Social media giants face huge [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,84,9,28,15],"tags":[459,374,391,1556,408,593,310,1033],"class_list":["post-97088","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-britain","category-government","category-law","category-media","category-technology","tag-censorship","tag-children","tag-facebook","tag-jdvance","tag-pornography","tag-socialmedia","tag-twitter","tag-unintendedconsequences"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-pfW","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97088","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97088"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97088\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":97089,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97088\/revisions\/97089"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97088"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97088"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97088"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}