{"id":95249,"date":"2025-04-23T05:00:04","date_gmt":"2025-04-23T09:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=95249"},"modified":"2025-04-22T13:14:38","modified_gmt":"2025-04-22T17:14:38","slug":"germanys-extremely-extreme-extreme-right-afd-now-the-most-popular-party","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2025\/04\/23\/germanys-extremely-extreme-extreme-right-afd-now-the-most-popular-party\/","title":{"rendered":"Germany’s extremely<\/em> extreme extreme right AfD<\/em> now the most popular party"},"content":{"rendered":"

Friedrich Merz, the leader of the “main” right-wing party in the Bundesrat<\/em> seems to have a problem with math, as he keeps promising to cut the AfD<\/em> support in half, yet ends up doubling it<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Many years ago \u2013 in 2018, to be precise \u2013 a man named Friedrich Merz was in the running to succeed Merkel as chairman of the CDU.<\/p>\n

Merz said many interesting things back then. On 14 November 2018, for example, he gave an interview to BILD<\/em>, in which he denounced Alternative f\u00fcr Deutschland<\/em> as a party “that does not distance itself from the right” and said that “this makes them unsuitable for any coalition”. Merz pledged to win back all the CDU voters who had defected to the AfD<\/em> over the years. “In the short term,” he said, “it will probably be impossible to get rid of the AfD<\/em>,” but if he were chosen to succeed Merkel, he pledged that he could “cut their support in half<\/a>“.<\/p>\n

The very next day he tweeted the exact same thing<\/a> \u2013 promising to lead the CDU back to 40% in the polls and to “halve the AfD<\/em>“. <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

At a regional CDU conference around this time, Merz yet again promised to “cut the AfD<\/em> in half,” adding that “this really is possible”. If I looked harder, I could probably find even more examples of Merz repeating this exact same promise. He made it such a core component of his campaign for the party chairmanship that the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung<\/em> observed in retrospect: “The whole idea of Merz as party chairman was based on the notion that he would win back votes that Angela Merkel had lost<\/a>“. <\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

The latest Forsa poll (conducted for RTL and ntv<\/a>) has Alternative f\u00fcr Deutschland<\/em> at a cool 26%. That is their best result in history, and it makes them the strongest party in the Federal Republic. This is the second such poll that places AfD<\/em> in first place, following an Ipsos survey from 9 April that pegged them at 25%<\/a>. <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Merz has indeed done something to AfD<\/em> support involving the operand of 2. It’s just not exactly what he imagined.<\/p>\n

Now all of that rhetoric we one once heard from the cartel parties \u2013 about the importance of dealing with the AfD<\/em> on the issues and of making convincing appeals to the “democratically inclined” among AfD<\/em> voters \u2013 have become yesteryear’s pablum. They are going to try to ban the AfD<\/em> now. Because they can’t beat them in any other way, and because they believe Germans shouldn’t be allowed to cast their votes beyond the narrow confines of the political cartel that runs the Federal Republic, they’re going to try to remove the AfD<\/em> from the board via legal trickery. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Of course, if the AfD<\/em> is now the most popular party in Germany, it must be suppressed ASAP, and the individual members of the party must be punished<\/a> “to save democracy”:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

In Germany, owning guns is a privilege that can be taken away \u2014 not for breaking the law, but for holding the wrong political opinion.<\/p>\n

Members and supporters of the right-leaning Alternative f\u00fcr Deutschland<\/em> (AfD<\/em>) party are now facing mass gun license revocations. The reason? The German government has labeled the AfD a “right-wing extremist” group \u2014 a political designation that suddenly makes its members “unreliable” under the country’s gun laws. And just like that, firearms must be surrendered or destroyed.<\/p>\n

If that sounds outrageous, it should. But it’s not surprising.<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

In 2021, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the Bundesamt f\u00fcr Verfassungsschutz<\/em> (BfV<\/em>), designated the entire AfD<\/em> as a “suspected threat to democracy”. That move allowed the government to surveil, wiretap, and investigate the party and its members.<\/p>\n

It didn’t stop there.<\/p>\n

Courts have now upheld revoking gun licenses from AfD<\/em> members, based solely on their political affiliation. In one case, a couple in North Rhine-Westphalia lost legal ownership of over 200 firearms. They weren’t criminals. They weren’t accused of wrongdoing. They were just AfD<\/em> members.<\/p>\n

Another court in Thuringia blocked a blanket gun ban for all AfD<\/em> members \u2014 but left the door wide open for revocations on a case-by-case basis.<\/p>\n

In Saxony-Anhalt, officials are reviewing the gun licenses of 109 AfD<\/em> members. As of last fall, 72 had already been targeted for revocation, with the rest under active review. The justification? Supporting a party the state now claims is “working against the constitutional order”.<\/p>\n

And the courts are backing it up. According to a March 2024 ruling, former or current AfD<\/em> supporters “lack the reliability” required to legally own firearms.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Friedrich Merz, the leader of the “main” right-wing party in the Bundesrat seems to have a problem with math, as he keeps promising to cut the AfD support in half, yet ends up doubling it: Many years ago \u2013 in 2018, to be precise \u2013 a man named Friedrich Merz was in the running to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1118,10,28,53,663],"tags":[1577,766,49,289,661],"class_list":["post-95249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-germany","category-liberty","category-media","category-politics","category-weapons","tag-afd","tag-democracy","tag-guns","tag-polls","tag-regulation"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-oMh","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95249"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95249\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":95253,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95249\/revisions\/95253"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}