{"id":9517,"date":"2011-05-26T12:07:33","date_gmt":"2011-05-26T16:07:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=9517"},"modified":"2011-05-26T12:16:28","modified_gmt":"2011-05-26T16:16:28","slug":"charles-stross-on-buckminster-fullers-dymaxion-house","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2011\/05\/26\/charles-stross-on-buckminster-fullers-dymaxion-house\/","title":{"rendered":"Charles Stross on Buckminster Fuller&#8217;s &#8220;Dymaxion House&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I remember something about Fuller&#8217;s potentially revolutionary design for housing from a few mentions in Robert Heinlein&#8217;s work, but I&#8217;d never followed up those hints. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antipope.org\/charlie\/blog-static\/2011\/05\/why-are-your-houses-so-heavy.html\" target=\"_blank\">Charles Stross<\/a> did:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>. . . the Dymaxion House was probably the most fascinating of his failures, because it was nothing short of an attempt to revolutionize how we live.<\/p>\n<p>Modernist architects of the 20th century generally designed two types of house: those for rich architects and other members of the upper classes to enjoy, and grimly regimented concrete cookie-cutter apartment blocks for factory workers. Fuller&#8217;s approach to housing was cookie-cutter-esque, insofar as he planned to mass-produce Dymaxion Houses on converted B-29 Superfortress production lines after the second world war, and ship them to their owners in freight containers, but as far as I know it was radically different in conception, purpose, and design from any of the other modular homes of the period. For one thing, he was interested in portability and nomadism; while a concrete foundation with utility connections was necessary, Fuller&#8217;s idea of moving house was that you could pack your house down into a container that would fit on a truck, drive it to your new neighbourhood, and deploy it again &mdash; the design influences of the traditional Mongolian yurt should be obvious. The Dymaxion House used aluminium sheeting for floors and structures, suspended by wires from a central steel structural shaft: saving weight was a priority. As he famously asked an architect on one occasion, &#8220;why are your houses so heavy?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>For another thing, he took an early interest in minimizing the human impact on the environment. The Dymaxion House had passive air temperature control and a pressure-triggered roof vent to survive near-misses from tornados (by releasing over-pressure inside the building so that it didn&#8217;t rupture). It had a then-unique mist-spray shower and a grey-water system to reduce water usage; Fuller was also interested in non-flush toilets.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, it was intended to be mass produced for $6,500 per house in 1946 money &mdash; the cost of a high-end automobile &mdash; with a design life of 30-50 years. Early development was funded by the Pentagon, for reasons that should be obvious: WWII generated unprecedented demand for accommodation on bases overseas and, later, demand for housing in war-ravaged regions.<\/p>\n<p>The story of why we aren&#8217;t all living in Dymaxion houses today is a convoluted epic of business failure (for one thing, starting up a production line for houses using cutting-edge aerospace technology was something that had never been done before; for another, Bucky&#8217;s business sense was not, sadly, as good as his design sense) that has been recounted in numerous biographies. What interests me about it is that it&#8217;s a far more <em>humane<\/em> approach to the problem of providing housing for the masses than his Brutalist contemporaries, whose designs tended to be fixed, immovable, made cheaply out of low-end materials, and built with high density mass housing in mind rather than low impact customizability. It was also <em>way<\/em> ahead of the field in terms of awareness of environmental constraints; while we could design better today, we&#8217;d be making incremental tweaks, whereas Bucky came up with the original idea of modular, lightweight, mobile low-impact housing <em>ab initio<\/em>. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/Fullers-Dymaxion-House.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"Fuller&#039;s Dymaxion House\" width=\"676\" height=\"404\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-9518\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/Fullers-Dymaxion-House.jpg 676w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/Fullers-Dymaxion-House-150x89.jpg 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/Fullers-Dymaxion-House-480x286.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/>Image detail from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/timoreilly\/4844164279\/\" target=\"_blank\">Tim O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Flikr photostream<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>More, including a few photos at <a href=\"https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/wiki\/Dymaxion_house\" target=\"_blank\">Wikipedia<\/a>. And <a href=\"http:\/\/rivet-head.blogspot.com\/2010\/04\/buckminster-fuller-dymaxion-house-henry.html\" target=\"_blank\">Rivet-head<\/a> has a picture of the house while it was in use.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I remember something about Fuller&#8217;s potentially revolutionary design for housing from a few mentions in Robert Heinlein&#8217;s work, but I&#8217;d never followed up those hints. Charles Stross did: . . . the Dymaxion House was probably the most fascinating of his failures, because it was nothing short of an attempt to revolutionize how we live. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[356,25,7,15],"tags":[426,174],"class_list":["post-9517","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-architecture","category-economics","category-history","category-technology","tag-housing","tag-innovation"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-2tv","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9517","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9517"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9517\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9521,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9517\/revisions\/9521"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}