{"id":89870,"date":"2024-06-23T03:00:19","date_gmt":"2024-06-23T07:00:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=89870"},"modified":"2025-10-05T16:12:41","modified_gmt":"2025-10-05T20:12:41","slug":"the-amazing-range-of-things-britains-ofcom-gets-its-tentacles-into","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2024\/06\/23\/the-amazing-range-of-things-britains-ofcom-gets-its-tentacles-into\/","title":{"rendered":"The amazing range of things Britain&#8217;s Ofcom gets its tentacles into"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Earlier this week, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.steynonline.com\/14379\/regulating-the-will-of-the-people\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Mark Steyn<\/a> discussed the British government&#8217;s Office of Communications (Ofcom) and the way it <strike><span style=\"color:red\">rigs<\/span><\/strike> regulates who can say what during British election campaigns:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Ofcom-home-page-detail-20240622.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right; padding: 0px 0px 10px 25px\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Ofcom-home-page-detail-20240622-480x197.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"480\" height=\"197\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-89871\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Ofcom-home-page-detail-20240622-480x197.png 480w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Ofcom-home-page-detail-20240622-150x62.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Ofcom-home-page-detail-20240622-768x315.png 768w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Ofcom-home-page-detail-20240622.png 780w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Why do I think the UK state censor Ofcom should be put out of business? Because there are very few areas of British life that this strange, secretive body does not &#8220;regulate&#8221;. Take, for example, this current UK election campaign, which the media are keen to keep as a torpid Potemkin struggle between TweedleLeft and TweedleRight. So, on Thursday night, BBC bigshot Fiona Bruce will host a debate between the four party leaders &#8211; that&#8217;s to say, the head honchos of the Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens.<\/p>\n<p>Wait a minute: what about Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform party? Since the beginning of the year, Reform has been <a href=\"https:\/\/data.spectator.co.uk\/polls\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">third-placed in the polls<\/a>, ahead of the LibDems and Greens, and last week they rose to second place <a href=\"https:\/\/www.standard.co.uk\/news\/politics\/nigel-farage-reform-poll-ahead-tories-yougov-b1164303.html\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">ahead of the unlovely Tories<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So why wouldn&#8217;t the second-place party get a spot in the leaders&#8217; telly debate?<\/p>\n<p>Ah, well, you&#8217;re looking at it all wrong, you hick. Here&#8217;s how the Beeb <a href=\"https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/uk\/nigel-farage-bbc-conservatives-labour-ofcom-b2562745.html\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">explain it<\/a>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<p><em>The Ofcom guidance gives &#8220;greater weight on the actual performance of a political party in elections over opinion poll data&#8221; taking into account the &#8220;greater uncertainty associated with support in opinion polls&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The &#8220;actual performance of a political party&#8221; refers to their results in the two previous elections &mdash; 2019 and 2015 &mdash; when Reform didn&#8217;t exist. A lot of other things didn&#8217;t exist in 2015: Brexit, Covid, lockdown, the Ukraine war, legions of vaccine victims, the massed ranks of Albanian males occupying English country-house hotels &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>But, per &#8220;Ofcom guidance&#8221;, Campaign 2024 has to be conducted on the basis of how things stood a decade ago.<br \/>\nYou know who would also be ineligible to participate under Ofcom&#8217;s rules? Everyone&#8217;s favourite Lana Turner sweater-girl in Kiev, Volodymyr Zelenskyyyyy. He only formed his Servant of the People party in late 2017, so no election debates for you, sweater-girl. And don&#8217;t try blaming it on Putin, because it&#8217;s &#8220;Ofcom guidance&#8221; so we all know it&#8217;s on the up-and-up.<\/p>\n<p>Because, as their barrister assured the High Court, Ofcom are &#8220;expert regulators&#8221;. Lord Grade and Dame Melanie Dawes probably did a module in regulation at Rotherham Polytechnic or whatever.<\/p>\n<p>I can see why the likes of Naomi Wolf&#8217;s creepy stalker-boy <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/naomirwolf\/status\/1802089456100360498\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Matthew Sweet<\/a> like this system: it&#8217;s a club and they get to decide who&#8217;s admitted. It&#8217;s less obvious why the generality of the citizenry put up with it. At any rate, get set for another thrilling BBC election debate in which all four &#8220;opponents&#8221; agree on Covid, climate, Ukraine, the joys of mass Muslim immigration and the inviolability of the NHS &#8230; but ever more furiously denounce each other for not tossing enough money that doesn&#8217;t exist into the sinkhole.<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I quite like that pixie Green leader who describes herself as a &#8220;pansexual vegan&#8221;, and I certainly don&#8217;t have the personal baggage with her that I have with Nige. But under what rational conception of media &#8220;regulation&#8221; does the six per cent basement-dweller get guaranteed a seat at the table but not Reform?<\/p>\n<p>And you wonder why nothing changes?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Earlier this week, Mark Steyn discussed the British government&#8217;s Office of Communications (Ofcom) and the way it rigs regulates who can say what during British election campaigns: Why do I think the UK state censor Ofcom should be put out of business? Because there are very few areas of British life that this strange, secretive [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,8,84,28,53],"tags":[459,188,1411,143,865,289,1606,661,1493,101],"class_list":["post-89870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-britain","category-bureaucracy","category-government","category-media","category-politics","tag-censorship","tag-electionwatch","tag-keirstarmer","tag-labour","tag-nigelfarage","tag-polls","tag-reformparty","tag-regulation","tag-rishisunak","tag-tv"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-nnw","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89870"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89870\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":89872,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89870\/revisions\/89872"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}