{"id":87984,"date":"2025-10-28T01:00:47","date_gmt":"2025-10-28T05:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=87984"},"modified":"2025-10-27T08:14:28","modified_gmt":"2025-10-27T12:14:28","slug":"qotd-pyrrhus-after-his-bloody-defeat-of-the-romans-at-heraclea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2025\/10\/28\/qotd-pyrrhus-after-his-bloody-defeat-of-the-romans-at-heraclea\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Pyrrhus after his bloody defeat of the Romans at Heraclea"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>What comes next, of course, is that Pyrrhus seemingly fails to capitalize on his victory \u2013 but I think in reality the opportunity to capitalize in the way that most folks imagine wasn’t really there.<\/p>\n

On Pyrrhus’ side, his army had been bloodied, but was mostly intact and was almost immediately bolstered by the arrival of his Italian allies, including the Lucanians and Samnites, along with the Tarantines. On the Roman side, Laevinius’ army was battered, but still extant; he fell back to Roman-controlled Campania, eventually taking up a position at Capua, the chief city of that region. Pyrrhus then marched north, entering Campania, bypassing the Roman force at Capua (which had been reinforced with two legions<\/a> pulled from Etruria<\/a>) and entering Latium, apparently getting within about 60 kilometers (c. 37 miles) of Rome (Plut. Pyrrh<\/em>. 17.5). And here the question students as is why not take Rome<\/strong>?<\/p>\n

And there is an easy answer: because he couldn’t<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

The first thing to remember here is the natural of the human-created terrain Pyrrhus has to operate in: functionally all of the cities of any significant size in third-century Italy were likely to be fortified and their populations \u2013 thanks to Rome’s recruitment system<\/a> \u2013 experienced and armed. Consequently, if the locals didn’t voluntarily<\/em> switch sides, Pyrrhus would have been forced to take their settlements either by siege or storm. Pyrrhus might well have hoped that the Campanians would go over to him, but here the problem is the human geography<\/em> of Italy: his army is full of Samnites, whose emnity with the Campanians is what started the Samnite wars<\/a><\/em>. This is a feature of Rome’s alliance system<\/a> noted by M.P. Fronda in Between Rome and Carthage<\/strong> (2010): because Rome extended its alliance system by intervening in local rivalries, both sets of new “allies” had long-standing grudges against the other, which makes it hard to dismantle Rome’s alliance network, since any allies you peel away will push others closer to Rome.<\/p>\n

In the case of Campania, Capua might have felt strong enough to try their luck without Rome, but that’s why Laevinius was sitting on it with a large army. But the other Campanian cities (of which there were about a dozen) might well fear exposure to Samnite raiding without Rome’s protection. Meanwhile, the Latins \u2013 the people of Latium, the region immediately to Rome’s south (technically Rome is in Latium, on its edge) \u2013 seem to have been pretty profoundly uninterested in siding against Rome either at this juncture or later when Hannibal tries to dismantle Rome’s alliance system.<\/p>\n

So after Heraclea, Pyrrhus has fairly limited options: he can start the slow process of reducing the cities of Campania one by one to open the logistics necessary to permit him to operate long-term in Latium<\/a> or he can conduct a lightning raid through Roman territory to try to maximize the psychological effect of his victory and perhaps get a favorable peace. He opts for the second choice and when the Romans opt not to take the deal \u2013 though they do consider it \u2013 he has to pull back to southern Italy (where he focuses on consolidating control, pushing out the last few Roman positions there).<\/p>\n

Why not attack Rome directly? Well, Rome itself was fortified, of course<\/strong>. Moreover, the Romans had raised a fresh levy of troops for its defense (Plut. Pyrrh<\/em>. 18.1), while dispatching Tiberius Corucanius with his army to reinforce Laevinius in Capua. So as Pyrrhus enters Latium, he has a well-defended fortified city in front of him and a Roman army of, conservatively, 30,000 men (Corucanius’ 20,000 men, plus whatever was left of Laevinius’ army) behind him. I don’t usually quote movie tactics, but Ridley Scott’s Saladin has the right wisdom for this problem: “One cannot maintain a siege with the enemy behind<\/a>“. Had Pyrrhus stopped to besiege Rome, his supply situation would have quickly become hopeless as the Roman army behind him could have easily prevented him from foraging<\/a> to feed his army during the long process setting up for an assault on the city, which might then simply fail<\/em>, since the city was well-fortified and defended.<\/p>\n

If Plutarch (Pyrrh<\/em>. 18.4-5) is correct about the terms Pyrrhus offered \u2013 an alliance with Rome, a recognition of their hegemony over Italy outside of his new clients in southern Italy (who would of course, fall under Pyrrhus’ control now) \u2013 Pyrrhus may have hoped at this juncture to consolidate southern Italy and turn back towards the East or perhaps head on to Sicily. But the Romans refused the deal and so Pyrrhus seems to have set above clearing out the last Roman strongholds (Venusia and Luceria) in Apulia to consolidate his hold. The Romans responded in the following year by sending a new army, under the command of Publius Sulpicius Saverrio and Publius Decius Mus to challenge him and they met at Asculum, in northern Apulia.<\/p>\n

Bret Devereaux, “Collections: Phalanx’s Twilight, Legion’s Triumph, Part IIIb: Pyrrhus”, A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry<\/em><\/a>, 2024-03-08.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

What comes next, of course, is that Pyrrhus seemingly fails to capitalize on his victory \u2013 but I think in reality the opportunity to capitalize in the way that most folks imagine wasn’t really there. On Pyrrhus’ side, his army had been bloodied, but was mostly intact and was almost immediately bolstered by the arrival […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1526,7,339,5,41],"tags":[31,1457,1095,1539,1345],"class_list":["post-87984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-greece","category-history","category-italy","category-military","category-quotations","tag-army","tag-bretdevereaux","tag-fortification","tag-pyrrhusofepirus","tag-romanrepublic"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-mT6","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87984"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87984\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":98756,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87984\/revisions\/98756"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}