{"id":87066,"date":"2024-01-31T04:00:03","date_gmt":"2024-01-31T09:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=87066"},"modified":"2024-01-30T16:57:47","modified_gmt":"2024-01-30T21:57:47","slug":"the-la-times-recently-laid-off-a-bunch-of-activists-masquerading-as-reporters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2024\/01\/31\/the-la-times-recently-laid-off-a-bunch-of-activists-masquerading-as-reporters\/","title":{"rendered":"The LA Times<\/em> recently laid off a bunch of “activists masquerading as reporters”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tom Knighton<\/a> illustrates one of the reasons so many legacy news organizations are being forced to cut back on staff in hopes of staying afloat:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Last week, the LA Times<\/em> announced a massive layoff of journalists. They were just one of several places that kicked the activists masquerading as reporters to the curb.<\/p>\n

This, of course, was met with consternation by the journalistic field as a whole.<\/p>\n

Everyone seemed ready to warn of doom and gloom, telling us how important they are to society and that we need them.<\/p>\n

Yet absolutely none of them seemed remotely interested in actually examining why<\/em> the field is shrinking so horrifically.<\/p>\n

Sure, the current landscape is very different due to technological advancements. For example, there’s places like Substack where I can reach out to readers directly instead of needing to filter things through a newspaper’s editorial voice.<\/p>\n

But journalists also did this to themselves.<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

Because journalism’s “inherently political” tribe uses their politics to decide which stories are worth reporting. Journalists, if we can even really call them that anymore, aren’t simply sharing truth. They’re amplifying some stories and smothering others.<\/p>\n

How often do we see stories claiming so-and-so is a white supremacist because he favors welfare reform or a tougher stance on illegal immigration? How many publications amplified the nonsense about Border Patrol agents “lassoing” illegal immigrants because of a picture they didn’t understand?<\/p>\n

Journalism doesn’t represent the American people. It represents the Democratic Party.<\/p>\n

In 1971, Republicans accounted for just over a quarter of all journalists. In 2022, they were 3.4 percent.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Original can be found here – https:\/\/www.theamericanjournalist.org\/<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

Now, in 1971, those independents were probably divided between left-leaning and right-leaning to some degree or another, though the survey didn’t capture that.<\/p>\n

In 2022, I suspect many who called themselves independent did so because they thought the Democrats were too right-leaning for their tastes.<\/p>\n

What’s more, despite the lack of ideological diversity, that same source found that only 21.8 percent see that as needing to change.<\/p>\n

What’s more, starting in 2016, news publications really stopped even trying to pretend they were unbiased. A form of blatantly activist journalism became common, with virtually every news agency in the nation showing at least some signs of it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tom Knighton illustrates one of the reasons so many legacy news organizations are being forced to cut back on staff in hopes of staying afloat: Last week, the LA Times announced a massive layoff of journalists. They were just one of several places that kicked the activists masquerading as reporters to the curb. This, of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[831,28,53,13],"tags":[1085,95,750,213,1020,269],"class_list":["post-87066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business","category-media","category-politics","category-usa","tag-fakenews","tag-jobs","tag-losangeles","tag-newspapers","tag-progressives","tag-propaganda"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-mEi","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87066"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87066\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":87069,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87066\/revisions\/87069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}