{"id":84614,"date":"2023-09-05T04:00:28","date_gmt":"2023-09-05T08:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=84614"},"modified":"2023-09-04T18:01:55","modified_gmt":"2023-09-04T22:01:55","slug":"the-misogyny-myth-persists-because-both-sexes-want-to-believe-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2023\/09\/05\/the-misogyny-myth-persists-because-both-sexes-want-to-believe-it\/","title":{"rendered":"“… the misogyny myth persists because both sexes want to believe it”"},"content":{"rendered":"

In City Journal<\/em>, John Tierney<\/a> disassembles the “misogyny myth” of modern culture:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Misogyny is supposedly rampant in modern society, but where, exactly, does it lurk? For decades, researchers have hunted for evidence of overt discrimination against women as well as subtler varieties, like “systemic sexism” or “implicit bias”. But instead of detecting misogyny, they keep spotting something else.<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

If you haven’t heard of this evidence, it’s because of the well-documented misandrist bias in the public discussion of gender issues. Scholars, journalists, politicians, and activists will lavish attention on a small, badly flawed study if it purports to find bias against women, but they’ll ignore \u2014 or work to suppress \u2014 the wealth of solid research showing the opposite. Three decades ago, psychologists identified the “women-are-wonderful effect”, based on research<\/a> showing that both sexes tended to rate women more positively than men. This effect has been confirmed repeatedly \u2014 women get higher ratings<\/a> than men for intelligence as well as competence \u2014 and it’s obvious in popular culture.<\/p>\n

“Toxic masculinity” and “testosterone poisoning” are widely blamed for many problems, but you don’t hear much about “toxic femininity” or “estrogen poisoning”. Who criticizes “femsplaining” or pretends to “believe all men”? If the patriarchy really did rule our society, the stock father character in television sitcoms would not be a “doofus dad” like Homer Simpson, and commercials wouldn’t keep showing wives outsmarting their husbands. (When’s the last time you saw a TV husband get something right?) Smug misandry has been box-office gold for Barbie<\/em>, which delights in writing off men as hapless romantic partners, leering jerks, violent buffoons, and dimwitted tyrants who ought to let women run the world.<\/p>\n

Numerous studies have shown that both sexes care more<\/a> about harms to women than to men. Men get punished<\/a> more severely than women for the same crime, and crimes against women are punished more severely<\/a> than crimes against men. Institutions openly discriminate against men in hiring and promotion policies \u2014 and a majority of men as well as women favor<\/a> affirmative-action programs for women.<\/p>\n

The education establishment has obsessed for decades about the shortage of women in some science and tech disciplines, but few worry about males badly trailing by just about every other academic measure from kindergarten through graduate school. By the time boys finish high school (if they do), they’re so far behind that many colleges lower<\/a> admissions standards for males \u2014 a rare instance of pro-male discrimination, though it’s not motivated by a desire to help men. Admissions directors do it because many women are loath to attend a college if the gender ratio is too skewed.<\/p>\n

Gender disparities generally matter only if they work against women. In computing its Global Gender Gap, the much-quoted annual report, the World Economic Forum has explicitly ignored<\/a> male disadvantages: if men fare worse on a particular dimension, a country still gets<\/a> a perfect score for equality on that measure. Prodded by the federal Title IX law banning sexual discrimination in schools, educators have concentrated on eliminating disparities in athletics but not in other extracurricular programs, which mostly skew<\/a> female. The fact that there are now three female college students for every two males is of no concern to the White House Gender Policy Council. Its “National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality” doesn’t even mention boys’ struggles in school, instead focusing<\/a> exclusively on new ways to help female students get further ahead.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In City Journal, John Tierney disassembles the “misogyny myth” of modern culture: Misogyny is supposedly rampant in modern society, but where, exactly, does it lurk? For decades, researchers have hunted for evidence of overt discrimination against women as well as subtler varieties, like “systemic sexism” or “implicit bias”. But instead of detecting misogyny, they keep […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[66,28,13],"tags":[262,254,355,139,513,43],"class_list":["post-84614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-science","category-media","category-usa","tag-culture","tag-gender","tag-prejudice","tag-psychology","tag-research","tag-women"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-m0K","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=84614"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84614\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":84616,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84614\/revisions\/84616"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=84614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=84614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}