{"id":83767,"date":"2024-04-08T01:00:57","date_gmt":"2024-04-08T05:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=83767"},"modified":"2024-04-07T17:17:49","modified_gmt":"2024-04-07T21:17:49","slug":"qotd-the-classical-roman-republic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2024\/04\/08\/qotd-the-classical-roman-republic\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: The classical Roman Republic"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>We can start with how the Romans defined their own republic, before we get into the constituent parts as they understood them. The Latin term for the republic was, naturally enough, res publica<\/em><\/a> (from which the modern word republic derives). Res<\/em> is a very common, earthy sort of Latin word whose closest English equivalent is probably “matter”, with that wide range of possible meanings. Res<\/em> can mean a “thing” more generally, “matter” in the scientific sense, but also in an abstract sense it can be an interest, a cause, a court case or other set of events, or property generally. Meanwhile publica<\/em> means “public”, in the sense of something held in common or collectively or done for the collective good or interest. That gives res publica<\/em> a wonderful kaleidoscope of meaning \u2013 it is the collective property (the “commonwealth”) of the citizenry but also the communal affairs, the matters of collective concern, the actions undertaken for the public benefit and indeed even the public benefit itself.<\/p>\n

It is the things<\/em> held in common. That ambiguity of meaning actually matters quite a bit because what the res publica<\/em> was and what was important about it was different for different people. But naturally for some res<\/em> to be publica<\/em>, that meant other res<\/em> needed to be privata<\/em>; much like the polis<\/a><\/em> was a collection of oikoi<\/em> (and thus its ability to reach within<\/em> the oikos<\/em> as a unit was limited) so too the res publica<\/em> was a collection of familiae<\/em><\/a> (a word we’ll come back to, because it is complicated; it does not neatly mean “family”), the affairs of which were privatae<\/em>, private.<\/p>\n

What I think is worth noting as one of those subtle differences is how this contrasts with the Greek conception of the polis<\/em>: a polis<\/em> was fundamentally a collection of politai<\/em> (citizens) whose institutions were their politeia<\/em> (government, state). But the res publica<\/em> is not a collection of citizens (Latin: cives<\/em>), it is something distinct from them, held in common by them.<\/p>\n

We can see this principle in the interesting phrase the Romans used to represent the senate: senatus populusque Romanus<\/em>, “The Roman Senate and People” \u2013 usually abbreviated to SPQR<\/em>.1<\/sup> The division there is striking: there is a Roman People (the populus Romanus<\/em>) and a Roman Senate and in some sense these are non-overlapping groups that together compose the republic. The Senate is not some sub-group of the populus<\/em> but a distinct one with is a co-equal<\/em> element of the republic with the populus<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Not only is the res publica<\/em> thus not simply a collection of citizens, but it is in a real sense understood as a shared interest of different groups in the community, of which the populus<\/em> is only one group. The Romans, more comfortable with open hierarchy among the citizens, can understand the republic as a balancing act between the interests of the political and social elite (the exact composition of which changes over time, but their mouthpiece is the Senate) and the people. The elite do not represent the people, they are not a select group of the people, but instead a distinct interest within the state which has its own legitimate expression, balanced against the expression of the people.<\/p>\n

If all of that doesn’t make much sense, don’t worry: we’ll see these principles work themselves out in the way the res publica<\/em> works and is structured.<\/p>\n

Bret Devereaux, “Collections: How to Roman Republic 101, Part I: SPQR”, A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry<\/em><\/a>, 2023-07-21.<\/p>\n

\n
    \n

    1. “Romanus<\/strong>” the adjective, modifies both senatus<\/strong> and populus<\/strong>, so both the Senate and the People are Roman. The phrase is often rendered into more idiomatic English as, “the Senate and People of Rome” to make that clearer.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    We can start with how the Romans defined their own republic, before we get into the constituent parts as they understood them. The Latin term for the republic was, naturally enough, res publica (from which the modern word republic derives). Res is a very common, earthy sort of Latin word whose closest English equivalent is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[62,7,41],"tags":[1457,400,1345],"class_list":["post-83767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-europe","category-history","category-quotations","tag-bretdevereaux","tag-language","tag-romanrepublic"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-lN5","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83767"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83767\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":88387,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83767\/revisions\/88387"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}