{"id":8330,"date":"2011-03-19T00:11:18","date_gmt":"2011-03-19T04:11:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=8330"},"modified":"2011-03-18T13:21:35","modified_gmt":"2011-03-18T17:21:35","slug":"american-digest-this-is-why-kodak-is-withering-away","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2011\/03\/19\/american-digest-this-is-why-kodak-is-withering-away\/","title":{"rendered":"American Digest: This is why Kodak is withering away"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tell me that <a href=\"http:\/\/americandigest.org\/mt-archives\/innovations\/instamatic_to_digimatic_t.php\" target=\"_blank\">this simple idea<\/a> has never occurred to anyone at Kodak:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>If the company that calls itself Kodak today had a brain, it would copy the &#8220;Instamatic 100&#8221; from Kodak&#8217;s greatest hits, drop a first rate lens in it, add some great chips, a view screen as big as the back of the camera, and rebrand it as the \u201cKodak Digimatic 100.\u201d Instant win.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/Kodak_Instamatic.jpg\" alt=\"Kodak Instamatic\" title=\"Kodak Instamatic\" width=\"370\" height=\"216\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-8331\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/Kodak_Instamatic.jpg 370w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/Kodak_Instamatic-150x87.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 370px) 100vw, 370px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>They\u2019ll never be cool enough to do it. Somewhere in the 1990s, Kodak lost the ability to design and innovate. Once the king of the camera world, Kodak&#8217;s now just the place where bad designs and worse marketing go to die. Today, Kodak needs a brain the same way Scarecrow needed one in the first reel of &#8220;Wizard of Oz.&#8221; Like Scarecrow, there&#8217;s a long brick road awinding into the land of its dreams.<\/p>\n<p>It wasn&#8217;t always that way. There was a time when it seemed that everyone in America owned an Instamatic. It was a camera that, in its simplicity, elegance and rock-bottom cost, was an icon of its age<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Of course, doing it now would be far too late: this was a winning strategy for 2001, not 2011. If they do it now, it&#8217;ll flop because they&#8217;ve squandered all the immense goodwill that used to be associated with the company name. It was the &#8220;everyman&#8221; camera and film: professionals had their specialized cameras and even more specialized film, but everyone else just bought Kodak. Kodak was &#8220;good enough&#8221;, dependable, predictable.<\/p>\n<p>It takes immense lack of talent to fumble that much potential so thoroughly and so consistently. Almost a genius level of anti-talent at the corporate level.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tell me that this simple idea has never occurred to anyone at Kodak: If the company that calls itself Kodak today had a brain, it would copy the &#8220;Instamatic 100&#8221; from Kodak&#8217;s greatest hits, drop a first rate lens in it, add some great chips, a view screen as big as the back of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,7,73],"tags":[140,174,29],"class_list":["post-8330","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bureaucracy","category-history","category-randomness","tag-design","tag-innovation","tag-photography"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-2am","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8330","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8330"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8330\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8334,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8330\/revisions\/8334"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8330"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8330"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}