{"id":82703,"date":"2024-02-19T01:00:39","date_gmt":"2024-02-19T06:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=82703"},"modified":"2024-02-18T09:52:57","modified_gmt":"2024-02-18T14:52:57","slug":"qotd-cleopatra-vii-philopator","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2024\/02\/19\/qotd-cleopatra-vii-philopator\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Cleopatra VII Philopator<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>This week on the blog we’re going to talk about Cleopatra or to be more specific, we’re going to talk about Cleopatra VII Philopator<\/em>, who is the only Cleopatra you’ve likely ever heard of, but that “seven” after her name should signal that she’s not the only Cleopatra.1<\/sup> One of the trends in scholarship over the years towards larger than life ancient historical figures \u2013 Caesar, Alexander, Octavian, etc. \u2013 has been attempts to demystify them, stripping away centuries of caked-on reception, assumptions and imitation to ask more directly: who was this person, what did they do and do we value those sorts of things?2<\/sup><\/p>\n

Cleopatra, of course, has all of that reception layered on too. In antiquity and indeed until the modern era, she was one of the great villains of history, the licentious, wicked foreign queen of Octavian’s propaganda. More recently there has been an effort to reinvent her as an icon of modern values, perhaps most visible lately in Netflix’ recent (quite poorly received<\/a>) documentary series. A lot of both efforts rely on reading into gaps<\/em> in the source material. What I want to do here instead is to try to strip some of that away, to de-mystify Cleopatra and set out some of what we know<\/em> and what we don’t know<\/em> about her, with particular reference to the question I find most interesting: was Cleopatra actually a good or capable ruler?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Now a lot of the debate sparked by that Netflix series focused on what I find the rather uninteresting (but quite complicated) question of Cleopatra’s heritage or parentage or \u2013 heaven help us \u2013 her “race”. But I want to address this problem too, not because I care about the result but because I am deeply bothered by how confidently<\/em> the result gets asserted by all sides and how swiftly those confident assertions are mobilized into categories that just aren’t very meaningful for understanding Cleopatra<\/strong>. To be frank, Cleopatra’s heritage should be a niche question debated in the pages of the Journal of Juristic Papyrology<\/em> by scholars squinting at inscriptions and papyri, looking to make minor alterations in the prosopography<\/a> of the Ptolemaic dynasty, both because it is highly technical and uncertain, but also because it isn’t an issue of central importance. So we’ll get that out of the way first in this essay and then get to my main point, which is this:<\/p>\n

Cleopatra was, I’d argue, at best a mediocre ruler, whose ambitious and self-interested gambles mostly failed, to the ruin of herself and her kingdom<\/strong>. This is not to say Cleopatra was a weak or ineffective person<\/em>; she was very obviously highly intelligent, learned, a virtuoso linguist, and a famously effective speaker. But one can be all of those things and not be a wise or skillful ruler, and I tend to view Cleopatra in that light.<\/p>\n

Now I want to note the spirit in which I offer this essay. This is not a take-down of the Netflix Queen Cleopatra<\/em> documentary (though it well deserves one and has received several; it is quite bad) nor a take-down of other scholars’ work on Cleopatra. This is simply my “take” on her reign. There’s enough we don’t know or barely know that another scholar, viewing from another angle, might well come away with a different conclusion, viewing Cleopatra in a more positive light<\/strong>. This is<\/em>, to a degree, a response to some of the more recent public hagiography on Cleopatra, which I think air-brushes her failures and sometimes tries a bit too hard to read virtues into gaps in the evidence. But they are generally gaps<\/em> in the evidence and in a situation where we are all<\/em> to a degree making informed guesses, I am hardly going to trash someone who makes a perfectly plausible but somewhat differently informed guess. In history there are often situations where there is no right<\/em> answer \u2013 meaning no answer we know to be true \u2013 but many wrong<\/em> answers \u2013 answers we know to be false. I don’t claim to have the right answer, but I am frustrated by seeing so many very certain wrong<\/em> answers floating around the public.<\/p>\n

Before we dive in briefly to the boring question of Cleopatra’s parentage before the much more interesting question of her conduct as a ruler, we need to be clear about the difficult nature of the sources for Cleopatra and her reign<\/strong>. Fundamentally we may divide these sources into two groups: there are inscriptions, coins and papyrus records from Egypt which mention Cleopatra (and one she wrote on!) but, as such evidence is wont to be, [they] are often incomplete or provided only limited information. And then there are the literary sources, which are uniformly without exception hostile to Cleopatra. And I mean extremely<\/em> hostile to Cleopatra, filled with wrath and invective. At no point, anywhere in the literary sources does Cleopatra get within a country mile of a fair shake and I am saying that as someone who thinks she wasn’t very good at her job.<\/p>\n

The problem here is that Cleopatra was the target of Octavian’s PR campaign<\/strong>, as it were, in the run up to his war with Marcus Antonius (Marc Antony; I’m going to call him Marcus Antonius here), because as a foreign queen \u2013 an intersecting triad of concepts (foreignness, monarchy and women in power) which all offended Roman sensibilities \u2013 she was effectively the perfect target for a campaign aimed at winning over the populace of Italy<\/strong>, which was, it turns out, the most valuable military resource in the Mediterranean.3<\/sup> That picture \u2013 the foreign queen<\/em> corrupting the morals of good Romans<\/em> with her decadence<\/em> \u2013 rightly or wrongly ends up coloring all of the subsequent accounts<\/strong>. Of course that in turn effects the reliability of all of our literary sources and thus we must tread carefully.<\/p>\n

Bret Devereaux, “Collections: On the Reign of Cleopatra”, A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry<\/em><\/a>, 2023-05-26.<\/p>\n

\n
    \n

    1. Or even just the seventh!<\/em><\/p>\n

    2. This is not to diminish the value of reception studies that trace the meaning a figure \u2013 or the memory of a figure \u2013 had over time. That’s a valuable but different lens of study.<\/em><\/p>\n

    3. It’s not all<\/strong> Octavian, mind. Cicero’s impression of Cleopatra was also sharply negative, for many of the same reasons: Cicero was hardly likely to be affable to a foreign queen who was an ally of Julius Caesar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    This week on the blog we’re going to talk about Cleopatra or to be more specific, we’re going to talk about Cleopatra VII Philopator, who is the only Cleopatra you’ve likely ever heard of, but that “seven” after her name should signal that she’s not the only Cleopatra.1 One of the trends in scholarship over […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[362,62,7,41],"tags":[1340,1391,1457,1513,347,588,1514,1345,101],"class_list":["post-82703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-africa","category-europe","category-history","category-quotations","tag-augustus","tag-biography","tag-bretdevereaux","tag-cleopatra","tag-debunking","tag-egypt","tag-marcusantonius","tag-romanrepublic","tag-tv"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-lvV","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82703"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82703\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":87474,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82703\/revisions\/87474"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}