{"id":82394,"date":"2023-05-28T03:00:33","date_gmt":"2023-05-28T07:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=82394"},"modified":"2023-05-27T09:04:34","modified_gmt":"2023-05-27T13:04:34","slug":"musical-copyrights-crazy-as-they-are-now-were-far-worse-in-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2023\/05\/28\/musical-copyrights-crazy-as-they-are-now-were-far-worse-in-history\/","title":{"rendered":"Musical copyrights – crazy as they are now – were far worse in history"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ted Gioia<\/a> outlines just how the concept of musical copyrights produced even more distortions in the past than they do today:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Assignments of copyrights photostat copies by mollyali (CC BY-NC 2.0) https:\/\/flic.kr\/p\/5JbsPE<\/p><\/div>\n

People tell me it was never this bad before. But they’re wrong. The music copyright situation was even crazier 500 years ago.<\/p>\n

The Italians took the lead in this, and it all started with Ottaviano Petrucci gaining a patent from the Venetian Senate for publishing polyphonic music with a printing press back in 1498. Andrea Antico secured a similar privilege from Pope Leo X, which covered the Papal States.<\/p>\n

It’s hard to imagine a Pope making decisions on music IP, but that was how the game was played back then. In 1516, Pope Leo actually took away Petrucci’s monopoly on organ music, and gave it to Antico instead. You had to please the pontiff to publish pieces for the pipes. <\/p>\n

Over time, this practice spread elsewhere. In a famous case, the composer Lully was granted total control over all<\/em> operas performed in France. He died a very wealthy man \u2014 with five houses in Paris and two in the country. His estate was valued at 800,000 livres\u2014some 500 times the salary of a typical court musician.<\/p>\n

But the most extreme case of music copyright comes from Elizabethan England. Here the Queen gave William Byrd and Thomas Tallis a patent covering all music publishing for a period of 21 years. Not only did the two composers secure a monopoly over English music, but they also could prevent retailers or other entrepreneurs in the country from selling “songs made and printed in any foreign country.”<\/p>\n

If anybody violated this patent, the fine was 40 shillings. And the music itself was seized and given to Tallis and Byrd. They probably had quite a nice private library of scores by the time the patent expired.<\/p>\n

But that’s not all. Byrd and Tallis’s stranglehold on music was so extreme it even covered the printing of blank music paper. That meant that other composers had to pay Tallis and Byrd even before they had written down a single note. Not even the Marvin Gaye estate makes those kinds of demands.<\/p>\n

Tallis died a decade after the patent was granted\u2014putting Byrd in sole charge of English music. I’d like to tell you that he exercised his monopoly with a fair and open mind\u2014especially because I so greatly esteem Byrd’s music, and also I’d like to think that composers are better at arts management than profit-driven businesses. But the flourishing of music publishing in England after<\/em> the expiration of the patent \u2014 when, for a brief spell, anybody could issue scores \u2014 makes clear that Byrd did more to constrain than empower other composers.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ted Gioia outlines just how the concept of musical copyrights produced even more distortions in the past than they do today: People tell me it was never this bad before. But they’re wrong. The music copyright situation was even crazier 500 years ago. The Italians took the lead in this, and it all started with […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,25,62,1117,7,9,28],"tags":[135,570,200,1333,380],"class_list":["post-82394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-britain","category-economics","category-europe","category-france","category-history","category-law","category-media","tag-copyright","tag-england","tag-music","tag-papacy","tag-patents"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-lqW","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82394"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82394\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":82395,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82394\/revisions\/82395"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}