{"id":82157,"date":"2023-05-15T05:00:59","date_gmt":"2023-05-15T09:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=82157"},"modified":"2023-05-14T22:16:05","modified_gmt":"2023-05-15T02:16:05","slug":"paul-wells-unworkable-and-swiftly-disavowed-tinpot-dictatorship-is-statistically-one-of-the-least-damaging-forms-of-tinpot-dictatorship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2023\/05\/15\/paul-wells-unworkable-and-swiftly-disavowed-tinpot-dictatorship-is-statistically-one-of-the-least-damaging-forms-of-tinpot-dictatorship\/","title":{"rendered":"Paul Wells – “Unworkable and swiftly-disavowed tinpot dictatorship is, statistically, one of the least damaging forms of tinpot dictatorship”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Paul Wells<\/a> follows up last week’s rather disturbing report that the Liberal Party’s big gathering in Ottawa extruded a resolution to get “The Government” to work toward forcing journalists (and those peasant bloggers like Paul Wells) to only publish things that the sources informing it could be “traced” by that same authority:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Last Friday I wrote about a policy resolution<\/a> at the big Liberal Party of Canada national convention that was, in my opinion, bad. This was the resolution that would have the party “request the government explore options” to “hold on-line information sources accountable” by requiring that they “limit publication only to material whose sources can be traced”.<\/p>\n

How do you limit publication to traceable sources? I have to assume you clear the sources. “This resolution has no meaning,” wrote I, “unless it means I would be required to clear my posts through the federal government, before publication, so the ‘traceability’ of my sources could be verified.”<\/p>\n

Some people disagreed, but I had a hard time getting them to describe what it could mean if it wasn’t what I thought. I was careful to note that party conventions aren’t binding on governments. Commenters sympathetic to the Trudeau government latched onto all the this-might-mean-nothing language, the stuff about “request” and “explore options.” At their convention, a tiny minority of registered Liberal delegates attended a “policy workshop” at which nothing was debated. Amid considerable<\/em> confusion about where these resolutions were in the party’s own process \u2014 Althia Raj covered it on Twitter; go look if you like \u2014 this resolution became party policy with no discussion at all. That was on Saturday.<\/p>\n

On Tuesday, Justin Trudeau went before reporters and said no Liberal government would ever implement this Liberal policy<\/a>. Other cabinet ministers followed suit<\/a>, and one MP who didn’t benefit from the counsel of the Monday-morning issues-management call had a rougher time executing the U-turn<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Look, I think the amount of self-inflicted ballistic damage to the government’s own foot here is minor. Unworkable and swiftly-disavowed tinpot dictatorship is, statistically, one of the least damaging forms of tinpot dictatorship.<\/p>\n

But I want to let everyone in on a secret of my journalism, and indeed of most journalism: Criticism of politicians is often advice<\/strong> to politicians<\/em>. I actually don’t spend a lot of time hoping governments and opposition parties will keep pursuing self-destructive and country-destructive choices indefinitely. I always hope a bit of mockery, especially pre-emptive mockery, will help inform their choices. If it stings when Wells writes it, it might sting worse when everyone is saying it<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Ministers of the Crown who didn’t need to wait for the Monday-morning issues-management meeting to tell them what to think could<\/em> have spent the weekend thinking for themselves. They might even have invited their own staffs, riding executives, and Liberals at large to think for themselves. A dozen or so hardy souls, out of 3,500 registered delegates, might then have showed up to the policy workshop willing to debate.<\/p>\n

“Uh, Paragraph Two looks hinky. How would a government enforce that?”<\/p>\n

“Well, it doesn’t apply to reputable journalists.”<\/p>\n

“Great, thanks. Remind me who decides who’s reputable? Any thought on who’ll be making those calls once we’re no longer in government?”<\/p>\n

Maybe somebody would have added a friendly amendment. “For greater clarity<\/em>, nothing in this paragraph impinges …”<\/p>\n

I can even imagine a cabinet minister showing up for those floor debates and influencing the party’s direction single-handed. I’ve seen it happen in other parties. But I had Liberal friends over the weekend explain to me that no such thing ever happens. Fine, it’s your funeral. Basically we’re watching a party choose between two different models of public-policy deliberation:<\/p>\n

OPTION 1<\/strong>: Smart people think and talk.<\/p>\n

OPTION 2<\/strong>: Everybody in the party defends rickety thinking until it blows up in their faces.<\/p>\n

I’m not kidding when I tell you most people in political communications would defend Option 2. We’re living in a time that values message over thinking. But folks can’t say I didn’t warn them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Paul Wells follows up last week’s rather disturbing report that the Liberal Party’s big gathering in Ottawa extruded a resolution to get “The Government” to work toward forcing journalists (and those peasant bloggers like Paul Wells) to only publish things that the sources informing it could be “traced” by that same authority: Last Friday I […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,84,10,28,53,15],"tags":[459,186,58,887,908],"class_list":["post-82157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-government","category-liberty","category-media","category-politics","category-technology","tag-censorship","tag-freedomofspeech","tag-internet","tag-justintrudeau","tag-liberalparty"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-ln7","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82157","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82157"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82157\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":82159,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82157\/revisions\/82159"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}