{"id":81823,"date":"2023-07-31T01:00:51","date_gmt":"2023-07-31T05:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=81823"},"modified":"2023-07-30T10:09:20","modified_gmt":"2023-07-30T14:09:20","slug":"qotd-stranger-in-a-strange-land-at-50","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2023\/07\/31\/qotd-stranger-in-a-strange-land-at-50\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: <em>Stranger in a Strange Land<\/em> at 50"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:left; padding: 0px 25px 10px 0px\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"400\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-48672\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png 400w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-50x50.png 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a>Heinlein&#8217;s very popular novel had a significant short-term effect on the culture when it came out but a negligible long-term effect, beyond adding &#8220;grok&#8221; to the language. Its most radical message was the idea of group marriage of a particular sort. The nests it described were stable high trust families formed with minimal search and courtship. You looked into someone&#8217;s eyes, recognized him or her as a water brother, and knew you could trust each other forever after. It was a naively romantic picture, possibly workable with the assistance of the protagonist&#8217;s superpowers, risky in the real world but fitting well into the naively romantic hippy culture of the time. Quite a lot of people tried to implement it; for some it may have worked. When I spoke on a panel at a science fiction convention some years ago, one audience member made it reasonably clear that she had joined a nest, was still in it, and was happy with the result.<\/p>\n<p>Sexual mores changed but not, for most, in that direction. Living in southern California in the eighties, the view that seemed most common among young adults \u2014 many of those I associated with would have been people I met through the SCA,<sup>1<\/sup> a subculture that had noticeable overlap with both science fiction fandom and hippiedom \u2014 was very different. The ideal pattern was stable monogamy but who could be so lucky? Insofar as it had been replaced it was mostly by the increasing acceptability and practice of casual sex.<\/p>\n<p>There has been some development since <em>Stranger<\/em> was published, in practice and theory, along the lines of group marriage of a somewhat different sort. Polyamory is more self-conscious and, at least in theory, more structured than what we see in <em>Stranger<\/em>. Partners are classified as primary or secondary and a good deal of attention paid to what those terms mean and what behavior they imply. The result is in theory closer to the Oneida Commune of the 19th century, on a much smaller scale, than to the nest described in <em>Stranger<\/em>.<sup>2<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>This fits not only what happened in the real world but what happened in Heinlein&#8217;s fictional worlds. Consider a more sophisticated version of group marriage, the line marriage in <em>The Moon is a Harsh Mistress<\/em>. It is highly organized, with new members brought in at the low age end on a regular pattern of alternating gender. There is extensive search\/courtship. And the protagonist offers a plausible explanation of its social role, why the institutions developed and what purposes it served.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, consider <em>Friday<\/em>, a later novel. The protagonist, surprisingly naive given her profession \u2014 secret agent \u2014 joins a group marriage, makes a substantial commitment to it and is booted out, her share of the assets stolen, when it is discovered that she is an artificial person, the superior product of genetic engineering. Her much later commitment to a second group marriage follows more careful research.<\/p>\n<p>David D. Friedman, <a href=\"https:\/\/daviddfriedman.substack.com\/p\/odds-and-ends\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Odds and Ends&#8221;, <em>David Friedman&#8217;s Substack<\/em><\/a>, 2023-04-29.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<ul>\n<p><em>1. The Society for Creative Anachronism, a historical recreation organization I have been active in for a very long time.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>2. The practice sometimes ends up as open marriage, monogamous for purposes of producing and rearing children but with no obligation to sexual exclusivity \u2014 an option made possible by reliable contraception.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Heinlein&#8217;s very popular novel had a significant short-term effect on the culture when it came out but a negligible long-term effect, beyond adding &#8220;grok&#8221; to the language. Its most radical message was the idea of group marriage of a particular sort. The nests it described were stable high trust families formed with minimal search and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,66,7,41,13],"tags":[311,262,1086,478,568,85],"class_list":["post-81823","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-health-science","category-history","category-quotations","category-usa","tag-1960s","tag-culture","tag-marriage","tag-robertheinlein","tag-sca","tag-sf"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-lhJ","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81823","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81823"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81823\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83936,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81823\/revisions\/83936"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81823"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81823"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81823"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}