{"id":80616,"date":"2023-03-11T03:00:54","date_gmt":"2023-03-11T08:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=80616"},"modified":"2023-03-10T16:08:38","modified_gmt":"2023-03-10T21:08:38","slug":"when-people-are-sticking-warning-labels-on-p-g-wodehouse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2023\/03\/11\/when-people-are-sticking-warning-labels-on-p-g-wodehouse\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;&#8230; when people are sticking warning labels on P.G. Wodehouse, something is seriously wrong&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In <em>The Conservative Woman<\/em>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativewoman.co.uk\/psmith-and-the-bbc-psilly-asses\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Alan Ashworth<\/a> stands aghast at the very notion of putting a content warning on an adaptation of a P.G. Wodehouse short story:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/PG-Wodehouse-covers.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right; padding: 0px 0px 10px 25px\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/PG-Wodehouse-covers-480x360.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"480\" height=\"360\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-62473\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/PG-Wodehouse-covers-480x360.png 480w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/PG-Wodehouse-covers-150x112.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/PG-Wodehouse-covers-768x576.png 768w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/PG-Wodehouse-covers.png 854w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/debate\/article-11821791\/DOMINIC-SANDBROOK-absurd-BBCs-cancel-culture-tsars-demonise-P-G-Wodehouse.html\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Dominic Sandbrook<\/a> in the <em>Mail on Sunday<\/em> draws attention to BBC Radio 4 Extra and its latest repeat of an adaptation of P.G. Wodehouse&#8217;s <em>Psmith in the City<\/em>. It is preceded by an announcement that listeners should steel themselves for &#8220;some dated attitudes and language&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>You don&#8217;t say. The story was written well over a century ago, appearing first as a serial in <em>The Captain<\/em> magazine in 1908 and 1909 before being published as a book by A &#038; C Black in 1910.<\/p>\n<p>In it Psmith (the P is silent) and his old school friend Mike Jackson are reunited when they find themselves working for the New Asiatic Bank, a thinly disguised portrait of the Hongkong and Shanghai Bank (now HSBC) where Wodehouse himself endured a torrid spell before his writing career took off.<\/p>\n<p>The two chums have several run-ins with management and Mike is eventually fired before Psmith solves all his problems and has him reinstated. Of course, as always in Wodehouse&#8217;s world, there is no sex, no angst, nothing to frighten the horses.<\/p>\n<p>So why the BBC announcement? Sandbrook writes: &#8220;At first I wondered if this must be some mistake. Perhaps the warning had been transposed from some more dangerous programme, such as a stand-up show by Bernard Manning? <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But the warning was meant for Psmith. So what were these toxic and potentially traumatising attitudes? For the life of me, I still don&#8217;t really know.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;At one point, Psmith talks of going &#8216;out East&#8217;, where you have &#8216;a dozen native clerks under you, all looking up to you as the Last Word in magnificence&#8217;. But was that it? Did that merit a warning?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;As it happens, this radio adaptation was made in 2008. Did the actors realise they were participating in something steeped in sick imperialistic assumptions? I doubt it.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Venturing into the cesspit of social media, I often find Left-wing pundits insisting there is no such thing as cancel culture and that the whole thing is an evil Tory myth.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But when people are sticking warning labels on P G Wodehouse, something is seriously wrong. Indeed, you could hardly find a more ludicrous target, because he was one of most tolerant, generous-spirited writers imaginable. So generous-spirited that he&#8217;d probably have laughed this off. &#8216;I never was interested in politics,&#8217; Wodehouse once remarked. &#8216;I&#8217;m quite unable to work up any kind of belligerent feeling.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Being cut from a meaner cloth, however, I do feel worked up about it. When I think of these finger-wagging commissars sitting in judgment on a writer who has given so much pleasure to so many readers, I feel like Bertie Wooster&#8217;s Aunt Agatha, gearing herself up before a titanic tirade.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Do we really need a warning that P G Wodehouse is &#8216;dated&#8217;? What next? A lecture before Hamlet, to warn us that poisoning your wife or killing your uncle is now considered poor form? A warning before Roald Dahl or Ian Fleming?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But, of course, Dahl and Fleming don&#8217;t need warnings now, for they have been posthumously updated.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In The Conservative Woman, Alan Ashworth stands aghast at the very notion of putting a content warning on an adaptation of a P.G. Wodehouse short story: Dominic Sandbrook in the Mail on Sunday draws attention to BBC Radio 4 Extra and its latest repeat of an adaptation of P.G. Wodehouse&#8217;s Psmith in the City. It [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,4,28],"tags":[52,238,1402,795],"class_list":["post-80616","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-britain","category-media","tag-absurd","tag-offensensitivity","tag-pgwodehouse","tag-radio"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-kYg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80616","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80616"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80616\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":80617,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80616\/revisions\/80617"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80616"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80616"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80616"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}