{"id":75350,"date":"2022-11-03T01:00:22","date_gmt":"2022-11-03T05:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=75350"},"modified":"2022-11-02T09:51:29","modified_gmt":"2022-11-02T13:51:29","slug":"qotd-why-reading-the-news-became-less-informative-and-more-didactic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2022\/11\/03\/qotd-why-reading-the-news-became-less-informative-and-more-didactic\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Why reading the news became less informative and more didactic"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:left; padding: 0px 15px 10px 0px\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"400\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-48672\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png 400w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-50x50.png 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a>One of the small, pervasive changes that makes news stories seem both patronizing and politicized is the increasingly common practice of inserting judgmental adjectives into otherwise descriptive sentences. Telling readers that a statement is &#8220;false&#8221; while repeating it may be justified, if intrusive, but in other cases it&#8217;s an unnecessary tic.<\/p>\n<p>Gone is the assumption that readers are intelligent people who can draw their own conclusions from a compelling presentation of the facts. Journalists now seem to live in fear that their readers won&#8217;t think correctly. Take this sentence from an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2022\/07\/26\/us\/american-sign-language-changes.html\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">interesting article<\/a> on the evolution of American Sign Language: &#8220;For a portion of the 20th century, many schools for the deaf were more inclined to try to teach their students spoken English, rather than ASL, based on <strong><em>harmful<\/em><\/strong> beliefs that signing was inferior to spoken language.&#8221; (Emphasis added.)<\/p>\n<p>If you read the article, you are highly unlikely to come to the conclusion that signing is anything less than a full-blown language, not inferior to spoken English. But the article never gives evidence that this incorrect 20th-century belief was harmful. It doesn&#8217;t discuss the pluses and minuses of signing, or why one belief was succeeded by another. That&#8217;s a different story. In the context of <em>this<\/em> story, the adjective is unnecessary, distracting, and insulting to the reader&#8217;s intelligence.<\/p>\n<p>Virginia Postrel, <a href=\"https:\/\/vpostrel.substack.com\/p\/shrinkflation-disqualiflation-and\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Shrinkflation, Disqualiflation, and Depression and more&#8221;, <em>Virginia&#8217;s Newsletter<\/em><\/a>, 2022-07-28.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the small, pervasive changes that makes news stories seem both patronizing and politicized is the increasingly common practice of inserting judgmental adjectives into otherwise descriptive sentences. Telling readers that a statement is &#8220;false&#8221; while repeating it may be justified, if intrusive, but in other cases it&#8217;s an unnecessary tic. Gone is the assumption [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,53,41,13],"tags":[400,477,213],"class_list":["post-75350","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-politics","category-quotations","category-usa","tag-language","tag-magazines","tag-newspapers"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-jBk","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75350","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75350"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75350\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":77621,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75350\/revisions\/77621"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75350"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75350"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75350"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}