{"id":75009,"date":"2022-07-16T03:00:14","date_gmt":"2022-07-16T07:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=75009"},"modified":"2022-07-15T14:37:22","modified_gmt":"2022-07-15T18:37:22","slug":"a-viable-conservative-party-in-quebec-isnt-that-somewhere-in-revelations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2022\/07\/16\/a-viable-conservative-party-in-quebec-isnt-that-somewhere-in-revelations\/","title":{"rendered":"A viable &#8230; conservative &#8230; party in Quebec? Isn&#8217;t that somewhere in <em>Revelations<\/em>?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the free-to-cheapskates portion of a <a href=\"https:\/\/paulwells.substack.com\/p\/la-wild-card\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Paul Wells column<\/a> on the unlikely and certainly unpredicted rise of a conservative party in Quebec, he points out just how ephemeral such parties have been in the past:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Screenshot-2022-07-16-at-14-29-03-La-wild-card.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Screenshot-2022-07-16-at-14-29-03-La-wild-card-480x380.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"480\" height=\"380\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-75010\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Screenshot-2022-07-16-at-14-29-03-La-wild-card-480x380.png 480w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Screenshot-2022-07-16-at-14-29-03-La-wild-card-150x119.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Screenshot-2022-07-16-at-14-29-03-La-wild-card.png 728w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>My <em>Big Book of Columnists&#8217; Clich\u00e9s<\/em> tells me I should call Duhaime the leader of Quebec&#8217;s &#8220;upstart&#8221; Conservative party, but if we&#8217;re being accurate here, it hasn&#8217;t really upstarted yet. Or maybe it keeps upstarting and then unstarting. Quebec had a <em>Parti conservateur<\/em> in the 19th and early 20th centuries, under whose banner eight premiers were elected. Maurice Duplessis essentially shut it down in the 1930s when he formed the <em>Union Nationale<\/em>. There was a <em>Parti conservateur<\/em> for a minute in the mid-60s, to no great effect. And there&#8217;s been a <em>Parti conservateur<\/em> since 2009.<\/p>\n<p>The latest party&#8217;s impact on electoral politics so far has been negligible. It won less than 1.5% of the vote in 2018, the year Legault&#8217;s amorphous populist-nationalist <em>Coalition Avenir Qu\u00e9bec<\/em> (CAQ) swept to power. It&#8217;s never elected a member to the National Assembly. For the past year, its only MNA has been a woman who got booted from Legault&#8217;s party for, uh, contributing to Duhaime&#8217;s.<\/p>\n<p>But things have been getting weird in Quebec this year. An Angus Reid Institute poll last week put Duhaime&#8217;s upstart party (see how easy it is?) in second place, well behind Legault&#8217;s CAQ but ahead of the historic Liberal and PQ parties and the urban social democrats in <em>Qu\u00e9bec Solidaire<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The Quebec Conservatives are, in fact, the leading party among male voters age 18-34 and 35-54. They&#8217;re not nearly as competitive among young women or among older voters in general. Duhaime would need his vote to keep growing, and not just a little, to have any chance of winning an election. Frankly he&#8217;s likelier to win zero seats, and perhaps likeliest to win somewhere between zero and a dozen.<\/p>\n<p>But the party has already gone from 500 memberships to 60,000 since Duhaime, a former Ottawa political staffer (<em>Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois<\/em>, then Canadian Alliance) and Quebec City talk-radio host, became its leader in 2021. That&#8217;s three times as many memberships as the CAQ had when Legault became premier.<\/p>\n<p>Duhaime is working on something, a discourse starkly different from Legault&#8217;s and also different, in important ways, from the recent positions of the federal Conservatives. He&#8217;s against vaccine restrictions \u2014 but he&#8217;s been careful not to associate with truck convoy protesters. He&#8217;s against Legault&#8217;s new French language law, Bill 96. Not because it&#8217;s mean to anglophones, although Duhaime is making at least a modest attempt to appeal to conservative anglophone voters, but because the law makes blanket use of the Constitution&#8217;s &#8220;notwithstanding&#8221; clause to sidestep Charter rights. Duhaime says no government should curtail rights so easily. He wants a great big dose of private for-profit health care.<\/p>\n<p>After two years of legislation by order-in-council and intermittent curfews and the most sweeping use of the notwithstanding clause in 40 years, Legault&#8217;s Premier-knows-best shtick has opened up room on his libertarian right. Enough room for a solid competitor? Duhaime himself shrugged when I asked him, during a brief chat after the parking-lot scrum.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We might win this,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We might get zero seats. <em>On est la &#8216;wild card&#8217; de la gang<\/em>.&#8221; <\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the free-to-cheapskates portion of a Paul Wells column on the unlikely and certainly unpredicted rise of a conservative party in Quebec, he points out just how ephemeral such parties have been in the past: My Big Book of Columnists&#8217; Clich\u00e9s tells me I should call Duhaime the leader of Quebec&#8217;s &#8220;upstart&#8221; Conservative party, but [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,7,53],"tags":[431,715,113,217],"class_list":["post-75009","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-history","category-politics","tag-conservatism","tag-constitution","tag-quebec","tag-rights"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-jvP","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75009"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75009\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":75012,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75009\/revisions\/75012"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}