{"id":73724,"date":"2024-06-14T01:00:40","date_gmt":"2024-06-14T05:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=73724"},"modified":"2024-06-13T10:30:19","modified_gmt":"2024-06-13T14:30:19","slug":"qotd-european-megacorporations-in-the-east","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2024\/06\/14\/qotd-european-megacorporations-in-the-east\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: European &#8220;megacorporations&#8221; in the east"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:left; padding: 0px 25px 10px 0px\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"400\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-48672\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png 400w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-50x50.png 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><strong>The great (and terrible) chartered trading companies offer a more promising historical parallel for the megacorporation<\/strong>, with much larger scope. The largest of these were the British East India Company (<strong>EIC<\/strong>, 1600-1874) and the Dutch East India Company (the <em>Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie<\/em> or <strong>VOC<\/strong>, 1594-1800). The EIC at one point accounted for something close to half of the the world&#8217;s trade and the VOC at points had total or near-total monopolies on the trade of important and valuable spices. Both companies were absolutely massive and exercised direct, state-like authority over territory and people.<\/p>\n<p>And the structure of these massive trading companies mirrors some of the elements of a megacorp. While both companies were, in theory, shipping companies, in practice they were massive vertically integrated conglomerates. Conquering the production areas (particularly India for the EIC and Java for the VOC), they essentially controlled the production chain from start to finish. That complete vertical integration meant that the companies also had to supply employees and colonial subjects, which in turn meant controlling trade and production in everything from food and clothes to weapons. Both companies had their own armies and fleets (the EIC boasted more than 25,000 company soldiers at its height, the VOC more than 10,000) and controlled and administered territory.<\/p>\n<p><strong>In short, they were the colonial Dutch and British governments for many millions of colonial subjects<\/strong>. For the people living in territory dominated by these companies, they really would have resembled the megacorps of speculative fiction, operating with effectively impunity and using their vast profits to field armies and navies capable of defeating local states and compelling them to follow the interests of the company (which remained profit-oriented).<\/p>\n<p>(I feel the need to stop and note that &#8220;company rule&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Company_rule_in_India\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">in India<\/a> and even more so in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dutch_East_India_Company#Criticism\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Dutch East Indies<\/a> was brutally exploitative, living up to \u2013 and in many cases quite surpassing \u2013 the normal dystopian billing of science fiction megacorporations. At the same time, it seems equally worth noting that the shift to direct colonial rule by the state was not always much better.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>So in one sense, the speculative fiction megacorp <em>has already existed<\/em><\/strong>, but in the other, <strong>the limits of these historical entities are informative too<\/strong>. First, it seems relevant that none of these companies were creatures of the markets, rather, they were created by state action \u2013 they were <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Chartered_company\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><em>chartered<\/em> companies<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/State_monopoly\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">state monopolies<\/a>, or both. These massive imperial trading companies (of which the EIC and VOC were the most successful, but not the only ones) were all created by their respective governments, armed with substantial privileges and typically given exclusive rights to certain trade \u2013 they were <strong>state-sanctioned monopolies<\/strong> (echoes of this also in the Japanese <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Zaibatsu\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Zaibatsu<\/em><\/a> state-sanctioned vertical monopolies; note that the Roman <a href=\"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-mqO#Publicani\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>publicani<\/em><\/a> [tax-farming &#8220;companies&#8221; of the middle and late Republic] were <em>also<\/em> state-sanctioned monopolies) whose monopolies were backed by state power to the point that their states (that is, Britain, the Dutch Republic, France and so on) would <em>and did<\/em> go to war to protect the trading rights of their monopoly trading companies.<\/p>\n<p>Second, these megacorporations, <strong>far from being in a position to usurp the states that formed them<\/strong> (as fictional megacorporations often do), <strong>turn out to be extremely vulnerable to those states<\/strong>. The EIC was effectively nationalized by an act of parliament in 1858 (after the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Indian_Rebellion_of_1857\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Indian Mutiny of 1857<\/a> discredited company rule in the eyes of the British government) and disbanded in 1874. The VOC was likewise nationalized by its parent government in 1796 and then dissolved in 1799. No effort was made by either company to resist being disbanded with any sort of force; it would have been a pointless gesture in any case. While the resources of the EIC were vast, the military capabilities of the British Empire were <em>far greater<\/em>. Moreover, the companies simply didn&#8217;t have the legitimacy to operate absent their state backing.<\/p>\n<p>This is of course also true for the not-quite-megacorporations, like the great trusts of America&#8217;s gilded age (Standard Oil, U.S. Steel, etc.), or the Japanese <em>zaibatsu<\/em> or even modern super-sized corporate entities. Of the 10 largest companies in the world, four are straight up state-owned enterprises. Even for the private modern massive company, by and large when they try to fight their &#8220;home&#8221; state, they lose, or at least are badly damaged without seriously inconveniencing the far greater power of the state (just ask <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Regional_Bell_Operating_Company\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">AT&#038;T<\/a> or Microsoft).<\/p>\n<p>Bret Devereaux, <a href=\"https:\/\/acoup.blog\/2021\/01\/01\/fireside-friday-january-1-2021\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Fireside Friday: January 1, 2021&#8221;, <em>A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry<\/em><\/a>, 2021-01-01.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The great (and terrible) chartered trading companies offer a more promising historical parallel for the megacorporation, with much larger scope. The largest of these were the British East India Company (EIC, 1600-1874) and the Dutch East India Company (the Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie or VOC, 1594-1800). The EIC at one point accounted for something close to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,4,62,7,23,41],"tags":[1457,1011,409,1473,1149,469,222],"class_list":["post-73724","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-asia","category-britain","category-europe","category-history","category-india","category-quotations","tag-bretdevereaux","tag-colonialism","tag-corporations","tag-dutcheastindies","tag-eastindiacompany","tag-monopolies","tag-netherlands"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-jb6","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73724","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73724"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73724\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":89662,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73724\/revisions\/89662"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}