{"id":72914,"date":"2026-01-20T01:00:36","date_gmt":"2026-01-20T06:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=72914"},"modified":"2026-01-21T10:16:16","modified_gmt":"2026-01-21T15:16:16","slug":"qotd-the-rise-of-eugenics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2026\/01\/20\/qotd-the-rise-of-eugenics\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: The rise of Eugenics"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:left; padding: 0px 25px 10px 0px\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"400\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-48672\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png 400w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-50x50.png 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a>The term &#8220;eugenics&#8221; only entered the lexicon in the 1870s. I want to say it was Francis Galton who coined it. Galton was one of those guys like T.H. Huxley (&#8220;Darwin&#8217;s Bulldog&#8221;) who made &#8220;Darwinism&#8221; into a substitute religion. &#8220;Eugenics&#8221;, then, was another scheme of secular salvation \u2014 the &#8220;scientific management&#8221; of the human population, no different, really, from Marxism in politics or Taylorism in business. That was the Gilded Age for you, but the point is, even though the term &#8220;eugenics&#8221; was new in 1870-ish, eugenic-type arguments were being made decades before. Antebellum defenders of the &#8220;Peculiar Institution&#8221;, for instance, made more-Galton-than-Galton arguments all the time: As modern life is inevitably trending towards greater mechanization, financialization, and integration, the human subtypes that can&#8217;t biologically handle those conditions will inevitably die out, unless &#8230;<sup>1<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>But then a funny thing happened. Twice, actually. The first one was the triumph of the Puritan fanatics in the Unpleasantness of 1861-5. Because they were certified Goodpeople (certified by <em>themselves<\/em> it goes without saying), and because their worldview triumphed through force of arms, they gave themselves a blanket indulgence to peddle the most repulsive kind of &#8220;scientific racism&#8221;. They just dropped the &#8220;racism&#8221; part and doubled down on the &#8220;scientific&#8221;. They called it first &#8220;Darwinism&#8221;, then &#8220;eugenics&#8221;, but the upshot of both was that they gave themselves the right, duty, and of course pleasure of pruning the human garden (to use one of their favorite metaphors).<\/p>\n<p>All those mandatory sterilization laws, the kind of &#8220;three strikes and you&#8217;re <em>permanently<\/em> out&#8221; crime reduction measures we can only dream of? It wasn&#8217;t <em>conservatives<\/em> pushing those. It was Proggies. Sane deal with the &#8220;Fitter Family Contests&#8221; that proliferated in the US right up to WWII.<\/p>\n<p>We didn&#8217;t get that stuff from [Hitler; he] got it from <em>us<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>And that was the second thing, of course \u2014 all the Nazis&#8217; nonsense about a &#8220;master race&#8221; [&#8230;] They would, could, and did point out that what they were doing was in no way different from the stuff agonizingly self-righteous American Proggies were pushing every single day \u2014 as the Nazis saw it, they [&#8230;] merely had the courage of their convictions. St. Margaret Sanger of the Holy Coat Hook, for instance, looked forward to blacks dying out thanks to her abortion activism. As the Nazis saw it, they were just cutting out the middleman.<\/p>\n<p>Severian, <a href=\"https:\/\/foundingquestions.wordpress.com\/2022\/04\/07\/on-duties-2\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;On Duties&#8221;, <em>Founding Questions<\/em><\/a>, 2022-04-07.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<ol>\n<li><em>Many people made this argument, but <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Josiah_C._Nott\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Josiah Clark Nott<\/a> defended it at greatest length, if you&#8217;re interested in that odd little branch of American intellectual history. Anthropologists try very hard to be the #wokest people on the planet (even other eggheads find them obnoxious, if you can imagine), so it&#8217;s fun to needle them with the history of their field \u2014 y&#8217;all know the so-called &#8220;American School&#8221; of anthropology was dedicated almost entirely to justifying slavery, right?<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Update, 21 January<\/strong>: Welcome, <em>Instapundit<\/em> readers! Have a look around at some of my other posts you may find of interest. I send out a daily summary of posts here through my <em>Substack<\/em> \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/substack.com\/@nicholasrusson\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/substack.com\/@nicholasrusson<\/a> that you can subscribe to if you&#8217;d like to be informed of new posts in the future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The term &#8220;eugenics&#8221; only entered the lexicon in the 1870s. I want to say it was Francis Galton who coined it. Galton was one of those guys like T.H. Huxley (&#8220;Darwin&#8217;s Bulldog&#8221;) who made &#8220;Darwinism&#8221; into a substitute religion. &#8220;Eugenics&#8221;, then, was another scheme of secular salvation \u2014 the &#8220;scientific management&#8221; of the human population, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,53,41,16,13],"tags":[209,783,457,1020,1310,99,1462,605],"class_list":["post-72914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","category-politics","category-quotations","category-science","category-usa","tag-anthropology","tag-eugenics","tag-fascism","tag-progressives","tag-puritanism","tag-racism","tag-severian","tag-slavery"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-iY2","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72914"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72914\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100468,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72914\/revisions\/100468"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}