{"id":70062,"date":"2023-04-10T01:00:55","date_gmt":"2023-04-10T05:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=70062"},"modified":"2023-04-09T10:15:00","modified_gmt":"2023-04-09T14:15:00","slug":"qotd-interaction-between-big-farmers-and-subsistence-farmers-in-pre-modern-societies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2023\/04\/10\/qotd-interaction-between-big-farmers-and-subsistence-farmers-in-pre-modern-societies\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Interaction between “big” farmers and subsistence farmers in pre-modern societies"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>What our little farmers generally have […] is labor \u2013 they have excess household labor because the household is generally “too large” for its farm. Now keep in mind, they’re not looking to maximize the usage of that labor \u2013 farming work is hard and one wants to do as little of it as possible. But a family that is too large for the land (a frequent occurrence) is<\/em> going to be looking at ways to either get more out of their farmland or out of their labor, or both, especially because they otherwise exist on a razor’s edge of subsistence<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

And then just over the way, you have the large manor estate, or the Roman villa, or the lands owned by a monastery (because yes, large landholders were sometimes organizations; in medieval Europe, monasteries filled this function in some places) or even just a very rich, successful peasant household. Something of that sort. They have the capital (plow-teams, manure, storage, processing) to more intensively farm the little land our small farmers have, but also, where the small farmer has more labor than land, the large landholder has more land than labor<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

The other basic reality that is going to shape our large farmers is their different goals<\/strong>. By and large our small farmers were subsistence<\/em> farmers \u2013 they were trying to farm enough to survive. Subsistence and a little bit more. But most large landholders are looking to use the surplus from their large holdings to support some other activity \u2013 typically the lifestyle of wealthy elites, which in turn require supporting many<\/em> non-farmers as domestic servants, retainers (including military retainers), merchants and craftsmen (who provide the status-signalling luxuries). They may even need the surplus to support political activities (warfare, electioneering, royal patronage, and so on). Consequently, our large landholders want a lot<\/em> of surplus, which can be readily converted into other things<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

The space for a transactional relationship is pretty obvious, though as we will see, the power imbalances here are extreme<\/em>, so this relationship tends to be quite exploitative in most cases. Let’s start with the labor component. But the fact that our large landholders are<\/em><\/strong> looking mainly to produce a large surplus (they are still not, as a rule, profit<\/em> maximizing, by the by, because often social status and political ends are more important than raw economic profit for maintaining their position in society) means that instead of having a farm to support a family unit, they are seeking labor to support the farm, trying to tailor their labor to the minimum<\/em> requirements of their holdings<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

The tricky thing for the large landholder is that labor needs throughout the year are not constant. The window for the planting season is generally very narrow and fairly labor intensive: a lot needs to get done in a fairly short time. But harvest is even narrower and more labor intensive. In between those, there is still a fair lot of work to do, but it is not so urgent nor does it require so much labor.<\/p>\n

You can readily imagine then the ideal<\/em><\/strong> labor arrangement would be to have a permanent labor supply that meets only the low-ebb<\/em> labor demands of the off-seasons and then supplement that labor supply during the peak seasons (harvest and to a lesser extent planting) with just temporary labor for those seasons. Roman latifundia<\/em><\/a> may have actually come close to realizing this theory; enslaved workers (put into bondage as part of Rome’s many wars of conquest) composed the villa’s primary year-round work force, but the owner (or more likely the villa’s overseer, the vilicus<\/em>, who might himself be an enslaved person) could contract in sharecroppers or wage labor to cover the needs of the peak labor periods. Those temporary laborers are going to come from the surrounding rural population (again, households with too much labor and too little land who need more work to survive). Some Roman estates may have actually leased out land to tenant farmers for the purpose of creating that “flexible” local labor supply on marginal parts of the estate’s own grounds. Consequently, the large estates of the very wealthy required<\/em> the impoverished many subsistence farmers in order to function<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Bret Devereaux, “Collections: Bread, How Did They Make It? Part II: Big Farms”, A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry<\/em><\/a>, 2020-07-31.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

What our little farmers generally have […] is labor \u2013 they have excess household labor because the household is generally “too large” for its farm. Now keep in mind, they’re not looking to maximize the usage of that labor \u2013 farming work is hard and one wants to do as little of it as possible. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,74,7,41],"tags":[1457,924,1272,703,1343,605,315],"class_list":["post-70062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-food","category-history","category-quotations","tag-bretdevereaux","tag-farming","tag-feudalism","tag-middleages","tag-romanempire","tag-slavery","tag-wealth"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-ie2","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70062"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70062\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":81317,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70062\/revisions\/81317"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}