{"id":68720,"date":"2021-10-01T03:00:26","date_gmt":"2021-10-01T07:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=68720"},"modified":"2021-09-30T13:55:21","modified_gmt":"2021-09-30T17:55:21","slug":"social-media-proves-derrida-correct-il-ny-a-pas-de-hors-texte-there-is-nothing-outside-the-text","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2021\/10\/01\/social-media-proves-derrida-correct-il-ny-a-pas-de-hors-texte-there-is-nothing-outside-the-text\/","title":{"rendered":"Social media proves Derrida correct – “il n’y a pas de hors-texte<\/em>” (“there is nothing outside the text”)"},"content":{"rendered":"

A look at how social media — especially Twitter — shows that Derrida had a valid point<\/a> … even if that isn’t the original intent.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Jacques Derrida (1930-2004).
Photo from https:\/\/bettyrojtman.huji.ac.il\/media-gallery\/detail\/15698\/15538 via Wikimedia Commons.<\/p><\/div>\n

Derrida once said “il n’y a pas de hors-texte<\/em>“, “there is nothing outside the text”, and since the social damage to words uttered ratio of that phrase must be among the highest in history, it’s worth exploring. Just so we’re clear, I have no idea what Derrida was trying to do with “deconstruction”, outside of the most basic general concept (I often doubt Derrida his own self had any idea what he was trying to do, but that’s irrelevant). But let’s do some “deconstruction” of our own on that phrase, since that has some interesting implications.<\/p>\n

If you take it as written \u2014 that there is nothing outside the text; that is, that the text exists as a complete unit of meaning, for its own sake \u2014 then it seems to argue for a kind of “positivism” in communications. Something like Orwell’s desire to develop “window pane” prose \u2014 writing so clear that the author would disappear and only the ideas would come through, unfiltered. Alas, this is a habit of mind that seems impossible to develop. No matter how clear your prose is, “writing” is one of those dialectical relationships so beloved of Marxists and stoned sophomores (lot of overlap between those groups, admittedly). In some vague, yet real and obvious, way, “writing” doesn’t exist apart from “reading”. Sure, sure, you can make marks on a page, but that’s all it is, until someone sits down to read it …<\/p>\n

… at which point his personality comes into play, his worldview, his circumstances, his history, to be somewhat pretentious about it. And this will be true even if \u2014 in a lot of cases, especially if<\/em> \u2014 you confine your prose to simple statements of fact. For instance, back in the early days of smartphones, I watched a minor miscommunication between a buddy and his girlfriend escalate into something very close to a relationship-ending fight, simply because neither party would stop texting and, you know, actually use the telephone<\/em> they were texting with. A five minute phone call would’ve straightened it all out, and needless to say a face-to-face chat would’ve solved the “problem” in about ten seconds, but since text messages are devoid of subcommunication and, crucially, context<\/em>, each party naturally brings his or her own biases to it, and, well … screaming, relationship-ending blowout for the win.<\/p>\n

See also: Twitter. Like most people, I gave it a look-see when I first heard about it. I quickly concluded that it wasn’t for me. Not because it was vapid garbage, you understand \u2014 Facebook was always vapid garbage, but it had some utility for all that, as Twitter does \u2014 but because I just don’t think in discrete chunks the way Twitter requires. I just can’t process the fact that “replies” are their own distinct utterances, devoid of all other context, that can come in at random times. A Twitter “thread” is a mad babble of people shouting past each other; it’s not “communication” in any sense my brain can handle, so I dropped it …<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A look at how social media — especially Twitter — shows that Derrida had a valid point … even if that isn’t the original intent. Derrida once said “il n’y a pas de hors-texte“, “there is nothing outside the text”, and since the social damage to words uttered ratio of that phrase must be among […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,15],"tags":[354,139,593,310,134],"class_list":["post-68720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-technology","tag-georgeorwell","tag-psychology","tag-socialmedia","tag-twitter","tag-writing"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-hSo","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68720"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68720\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":68722,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68720\/revisions\/68722"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}