{"id":66136,"date":"2024-05-18T01:00:01","date_gmt":"2024-05-18T05:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=66136"},"modified":"2024-05-17T09:46:39","modified_gmt":"2024-05-17T13:46:39","slug":"qotd-academic-research-and-the-phantom-cite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2024\/05\/18\/qotd-academic-research-and-the-phantom-cite\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Academic research and the “phantom cite”"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>If you’ve done any academic work at all, in any field \u2014 scratch that, if you’ve done any competent, diligent<\/em> work in any field \u2014 you’ve experienced the frustration of the “phantom cite”. This is where you see a startling assertion in Jones. You check his footnote \u2014 see Smith. You go pull Smith off the shelves, and his footnote says “see Williams”. Williams cites Parker, Parker cites Adams, Adams cites Rogers, until finally, you pull Rogers and … nothing. Not the “oh gosh, I’d have to travel to the British Museum to check this, and it’s in Medieval High Bulgarian anyway” kind of nothing, but the bald-ass assertion kind of nothing.<\/p>\n

Happens all the time. There are a couple of reasons for this. Being as charitable as I possibly can, I’m going to call one “survivorship bias”. I’m sure you’ve seen this … Since, again, we’re being extremely<\/em> charitable here, this isn’t actually a case of “just tell ’em what they want to hear”. I’ll illustrate from my own research experience. My dissertation asserts that General Ripper, commander of the 43rd Imaginary Infantry in Au Phuc Dup province, Republic of Vietnam, was convinced that the local provincial governor, Long Duc Dong, was a Communist infiltrator. Now, this is a 100% true fact, that Gen. Ripper believes<\/em> Long Duc Dong is a Communist. Armies are awash in paperwork, and moreover Gen. Ripper was an obsessive letter-writer and diarist, so you can find hundreds if not thousands of citations stating it directly: “I, Gen. Ripper, believe that Long Duc Dong is a Communist”.<\/p>\n

Which explains quite a bit about why Gen. Ripper made the decisions he did, which in turn is why this 100% indisputably true fact \u2014 that Gen. Ripper thought<\/em> Long Duc Dong was a Communist \u2014 features so prominently in that study of the dynamics of command in the 43rd Imaginary Infantry.<\/p>\n

The problem, though, is that some other historian comes along, looking at something very different \u2014 say, the effectiveness of anti-Communist propaganda in the IV Corps operational area \u2014 and comes across my dissertation. From this, he writes “So ineffective was the anti-Communist propaganda campaign that even the governor, Long Duc Dong, was strongly suspected of being a Communist infiltrator”. And from that<\/em>, another historian, looking for the prevalence of pro-Communist sentiment, concludes that “despite the Americans’ best efforts, the extreme south of the RVN was so thoroughly indoctrinated that even the Governor, Long Duc Dong, was a Communist”.<\/p>\n

Now, all of that is true except for the last bit<\/em>. It is not, in fact, proven that Long Duc Dong was a Communist. Gen. Ripper sure thought he was. And Gen. Ripper continued to think so, even after the anti-Communist propaganda campaign, which means that the campaign indisputably failed in Long Duc Dong’s case \u2014 he carried on acting like enough of a commie to keep Gen. Ripper’s suspicions up. But thanks to the thicket of citations, it’s the last bit \u2014 the assertion that Long Duc Dong was, indisputably, a Communist \u2014 that has by far the most footnotes attached to it. Hell, the footnotes probably cite all the same things I did \u2014 the truckloads of letters and documents from Gen. Ripper saying “Damn that Long Duc Dong, he’s a Communist!!”<\/p>\n

That’s because he lifted them straight from my dissertation, all impeccably footnoted \u2014 by which is meant, giving ME full credit \u2014 and do you see what I mean? None of the historians involved had any obvious axe to grind, no viewpoint to push. It’s just that everyone’s bibliography is a hundred pages long, and nobody has the time to read every page of every book in those hundred pages. Jones just skimmed Smith’s index, looking for names of commies. Smith did the same thing with my<\/em> index, of course, in which he found “Dong, Long Duc, Communist sympathies of,” with dozens of page numbers referenced.<\/p>\n

Severian, “‘Studies'”, Rotten Chestnuts<\/em>, 2021-05-22.<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If you’ve done any academic work at all, in any field \u2014 scratch that, if you’ve done any competent, diligent work in any field \u2014 you’ve experienced the frustration of the “phantom cite”. This is where you see a startling assertion in Jones. You check his footnote \u2014 see Smith. You go pull Smith off […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,79,7,5,41,13],"tags":[513,1462,764,585],"class_list":["post-66136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-asia","category-education","category-history","category-military","category-quotations","category-usa","tag-research","tag-severian","tag-university","tag-vietnam"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-hcI","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66136"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66136\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":89056,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66136\/revisions\/89056"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}