{"id":57899,"date":"2020-06-16T03:00:28","date_gmt":"2020-06-16T07:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=57899"},"modified":"2020-06-15T14:42:33","modified_gmt":"2020-06-15T18:42:33","slug":"andrew-sullivan-on-puritanism-in-the-current-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2020\/06\/16\/andrew-sullivan-on-puritanism-in-the-current-year\/","title":{"rendered":"Andrew Sullivan on Puritanism in the Current Year"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/nymag.com\/intelligencer\/2020\/06\/andrew-sullivan-is-there-still-room-for-debate.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Andrew Sullivan<\/a> wonders if there&#8217;s any room for debate any more:<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_57900\" style=\"width: 760px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Puritan-book-burning-Wikimedia-Commons.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-57900\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Puritan-book-burning-Wikimedia-Commons.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"750\" height=\"599\" class=\"size-full wp-image-57900\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Puritan-book-burning-Wikimedia-Commons.png 750w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Puritan-book-burning-Wikimedia-Commons-480x383.png 480w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Puritan-book-burning-Wikimedia-Commons-150x120.png 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-57900\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Portrayal of the burning of copies of William Pynchon&#8217;s book <em>The Meritous Price of Our Redemption<\/em> by early colonists of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, who saw his book as heresy; it was the first-ever banned book in the New World and only 4 original copies are known to survive today.<br \/>Engraving by F.T. Merrill in <em>The History of Springfield for the Young<\/em> by Charles Barrows, 1921.<\/p><\/div>\n<blockquote><p>In the last couple of weeks, as the purges of alleged racists have intensified in every sphere, and as so many corporations, associations, and all manner of civic institutions have openly pledged allegiance to anti-racism, with all the workshops, books, and lectures that come with it, I&#8217;m reminded of a V\u00e1clav Havel <a href=\"https:\/\/hac.bard.edu\/amor-mundi\/the-power-of-the-powerless-vaclav-havel-2011-12-23\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">essay<\/a>, &#8220;The Power of the Powerless.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s about the dilemma of living in a world where adherence to a particular ideology becomes mandatory. In Communist Czechoslovakia, this orthodoxy, with its tired slogans, and abuse of language, had to be enforced brutally by the state, its spies, and its informers. In America, of course, with the First Amendment, this is impossible. But perhaps for that very reason, Americans have always been good at policing uniformity by and among themselves. The puritanical streak of shaming and stigmatizing and threatening runs deep. This is the country of extraordinary political and cultural freedom, but it is also the country of religious fanaticism, moral panics, and crusades against vice. It&#8217;s the country of <em>The Scarlet Letter<\/em> and Prohibition and the Hollywood blacklist and the Lavender Scare. The kind of stifling, suffocating, and nerve-racking atmosphere that Havel evokes is chillingly recognizable in American history and increasingly in the American present.<\/p>\n<p>The new orthodoxy \u2014 what the writer Wesley Yang has described as the &#8220;successor ideology&#8221; to liberalism \u2014 seems to be rooted in what journalist Wesley Lowery <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/06\/07\/business\/media\/new-york-times-washington-post-protests.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">calls<\/a> &#8220;moral clarity.&#8221; He told <em>Times<\/em> media columnist Ben Smith this week that journalism needs to be rebuilt around that moral clarity, which means ending its attempt to see all sides of a story, when there is only one, and dropping even an attempt at objectivity (however unattainable that ideal might be). And what is the foundational belief of such moral clarity? That America is systemically racist, and a white-supremacist project from the start, that, as Lowery <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/2020\/06\/wesley-lowery-george-floyd-minneapolis-black-lives\/612391\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">put it in <em>The Atlantic<\/em><\/a>, &#8220;the justice system \u2014 in fact, the entire American experiment \u2014 was from its inception designed to perpetuate racial inequality.&#8221; (<em>Wesley Lowery objected to this characterization of his beliefs \u2014 read his Twitter thread about it <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/WesleyLowery\/status\/1271545701432991744\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a><\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p>This is an argument that deserves to be aired openly in a liberal society, especially one with such racial terror and darkness in its past and inequality in the present. But it is an argument that equally deserves to be engaged, challenged, questioned, interrogated. There is truth in it, truth that it&#8217;s incumbent on us to understand more deeply and empathize with more thoroughly. But there is also an awful amount of truth it ignores or elides or simply denies.<\/p>\n<p>It sees America as in its essence not about freedom but oppression. It argues, in fact, that all the ideals about individual liberty, religious freedom, limited government, and the equality of all human beings were always a falsehood to cover for and justify and entrench the enslavement of human beings under the fiction of race. It wasn&#8217;t that these values competed with the poison of slavery, and eventually overcame it, in an epic, bloody civil war whose casualties were overwhelmingly white. It&#8217;s that the liberal system is itself a form of white supremacy \u2014 which is why racial inequality endures and why liberalism&#8217;s core values and institutions cannot be reformed and can only be dismantled.<\/p>\n<p>This view of the world certainly has &#8220;moral clarity.&#8221; What it lacks is moral complexity. No country can be so reduced to one single prism and damned because of it. American society has far more complexity and history has far more contingency than can be jammed into this rubric. No racial group is homogeneous, and every individual has agency. No one is entirely a victim or entirely privileged. And we are not defined by black and white any longer; we are home to every race and ethnicity, from Asia through Africa to Europe and South America.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Andrew Sullivan wonders if there&#8217;s any room for debate any more: In the last couple of weeks, as the purges of alleged racists have intensified in every sphere, and as so many corporations, associations, and all manner of civic institutions have openly pledged allegiance to anti-racism, with all the workshops, books, and lectures that come [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,10,53,13],"tags":[622,1020,1310,99],"class_list":["post-57899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","category-liberty","category-politics","category-usa","tag-ideology","tag-progressives","tag-puritanism","tag-racism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-f3R","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57899"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57899\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57901,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57899\/revisions\/57901"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}