{"id":54150,"date":"2020-04-11T01:00:08","date_gmt":"2020-04-11T05:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=54150"},"modified":"2020-04-10T08:47:16","modified_gmt":"2020-04-10T12:47:16","slug":"qotd-zhou-enlais-famous-too-early-to-say-comment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2020\/04\/11\/qotd-zhou-enlais-famous-too-early-to-say-comment\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Zhou Enlai’s famous “too early to say” comment on the French Revolution"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>When Chinese premier Zhou Enlai famously said it was “too early” to assess the implications of the French revolution, he was referring to turmoil in France in 1968 and not \u2014 as is commonly thought \u2014 to the more distant political upheaval of 1789.<\/p>\n

So says a retired American diplomat, Charles W. (Chas) Freeman Jr., who was present when Zhou made the comment during President Richard Nixon’s visit to China in February 1972.<\/p>\n

Freeman, who was Nixon’s interpreter during the historic, weeklong trip, made the disclosure last week during a panel discussion in Washington about On China<\/em>, the latest book by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.<\/p>\n

The discussion was moderated by Richard McGregor, a journalist and China expert who wrote about Freeman’s comments for the Financial Times<\/em> of London.<\/p>\n

In an interview yesterday, Freeman elaborated on his recollection about Zhou’s comment, the conventional interpretation of which is frequently offered as evidence of China’s sage, patient, and far-sighted ways. Foreign Policy<\/em> magazine, for example, referred last month to that interpretation, saying the comment was “a cautionary warning of the perils of judgments made in real time.”<\/p>\n

The Washington Post<\/em>‘s recent review of Kissinger’s book likewise referred to the conventional understanding of Zhou’s remark.<\/p>\n

Freeman described Zhou’s misconstrued comment as “one of those convenient misunderstandings that never gets corrected.”<\/p>\n

He said Zhou’s remark probably was made over lunch or dinner, during a discussion about revolutions that had succeeded and failed. They included, Freeman said, the Prague Spring of 1968 and the Hungarian uprising of 1956, both of which the Soviet Union crushed.<\/p>\n

He said it was clear from the context and content of Zhou’s comment that in saying it was “too early to say” the Chinese leader was speaking about the events in France in May 1968, not the years of upheaval that began in 1789.<\/p>\n

Freeman acknowledged that the conventional interpretation makes for a better story but added that it was “absolutely clear” from the context of the discussion that Zhou was speaking about 1968.<\/p>\n

W. Joseph Campbell, “‘Too early to say’: Zhou was speaking about 1968, not 1789”, Media Myth Alert<\/em><\/a>, 2011-06-14.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When Chinese premier Zhou Enlai famously said it was “too early” to assess the implications of the French revolution, he was referring to turmoil in France in 1968 and not \u2014 as is commonly thought \u2014 to the more distant political upheaval of 1789. So says a retired American diplomat, Charles W. (Chas) Freeman Jr., […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,1117,7,28,41,13],"tags":[311,263,347,432,515],"class_list":["post-54150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-france","category-history","category-media","category-quotations","category-usa","tag-1960s","tag-1970s","tag-debunking","tag-diplomacy","tag-richardnixon"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-e5o","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54150"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54150\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56333,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54150\/revisions\/56333"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}