{"id":53255,"date":"2019-12-03T05:00:45","date_gmt":"2019-12-03T10:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=53255"},"modified":"2022-04-07T16:52:48","modified_gmt":"2022-04-07T20:52:48","slug":"canada-and-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2019\/12\/03\/canada-and-china\/","title":{"rendered":"Canada and China"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/coloneltedcampbell.blog\/2019\/12\/02\/canadas-lack-of-a-china-policy\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Ted Campbell<\/a> discusses Canadian foreign policies &mdash; or perhaps more accurately Canada&#8217;s <em>lack of<\/em> policies &mdash; on China:<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_46192\" style=\"width: 387px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Cultural-Revolution-poster-Wikimedia-Commons.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-46192\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Cultural-Revolution-poster-Wikimedia-Commons.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"377\" height=\"264\" class=\"size-full wp-image-46192\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Cultural-Revolution-poster-Wikimedia-Commons.jpg 377w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Cultural-Revolution-poster-Wikimedia-Commons-150x105.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 377px) 100vw, 377px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-46192\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">&#8220;The Chinese People&#8217;s Liberation Army is the great school of Mao Zedong Thought&#8221;, 1969. <br \/>A poster from the Cultural Revolution, featuring an image of Chairman Mao, published by the government of the People&#8217;s Republic of China. <br \/>Image via Wikimedia Commons.<\/p><\/div>\n<blockquote><p>There were many things that history might find regrettable about the Mulroney years but I doubt that it will fault him for having a principled and coherent foreign policy.<\/p>\n<p>That all changed with Jean Chr\u00e9tien, who was almost a <em>neo-mercantilist<\/em>, and for whom principle could never stand in the way of profit.<\/p>\n<p>In the modern (Chr\u00e9tien-Martin-Harper-Trudeau) era, Conservatives have been, broadly, anti-China, sometimes for reasons that are less than coherent or principled, and Liberals have been too prepared to &#8220;go along to get along&#8221; with China. This is because both parties reflect the incoherent views of the whole country. But political leaders shouldn&#8217;t (mustn&#8217;t) just reflect the views of their voters ~ that sort of <em>populism<\/em> is nonsensical ~ they must, as Edmund Burke said, bring his or her &#8220;unbiased opinion &#8230; mature judgment &#8230; [and] \u2026 enlightened conscience&#8221; to bear on each issue. But I&#8217;m afraid that too many (most?) modern Canadian political tacticians hold all those things in scant regard.<\/p>\n<p>In the 2020s Canadians must listen to a few clear voices who will tell them that China is a competitor in many &#8220;markets&#8221; including in the marketplace of ideas, ideals, institutions and values. The current Chinese leadership is overtly hostile to Weterm <em><strong>liberal<\/strong>-democratic<\/em> values and is not unwilling to punish any country with which it disagrees. It is protectionist, relatively rich and growing in military, political and economic power, but, still, somewhat cautious, and Xi Jinping&#8217;s China seems to be able to separate its own short-term political interests from its firm, long term, <em>strategic<\/em> goals. China, <a href=\"https:\/\/coloneltedcampbell.blog\/2019\/11\/30\/more-from-kevin-rudd-about-china\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">as Kevin Rudd reminded us just a few days ago<\/a> &#8220;<strong>is contemptuous of weakness and prevarication<\/strong>,&#8221; which explains why it is so obviously contemptuous of Justin Trudeau&#8217;s Canadian government.<\/p>\n<p>It is a fact that the Sino-Canadian relationship is &#8220;unbalanced:&#8221; China is a great power, Canada is not; China is an autocracy, Canada is a democracy; and so on but, as Kevin Rudd said (link just above) &#8220;China too has net strengths and weaknesses of which &#8230; [our] &#8230;  strategists should be aware in framing our own strategy &#8230; [and we] &#8230; should be equally aware of our own strengths, weaknesses and vulnerabilities.&#8221; Canadian strategists need to educate Canadians about China so that a solid, informed majority will want a coherent and principled policy ~ one that puts our national <em>vital interests<\/em> first [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Our policy towards China needs to be just one part of a coherent, principled foreign policy which Canadians understand and, broadly, support, and that, in turn, needs to be part of a Canadian <strong><em>grand strategy<\/em><\/strong> that aims to secure a place, as <a href=\"http:\/\/aix1.uottawa.ca\/~rparis\/IPS_2005.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Paul Martin suggested<\/a>, &#8220;<em>of pride and influence in the world<\/em>&#8221; ~ that, of course, was a place we enjoyed under St Laurent, Diefenbaker and Pearson, all of whom were acutely aware of the many and varied (and very divergent) views about Canada in the world that existed then and persist today in Canada&#8217;s many and varied communities.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ted Campbell discusses Canadian foreign policies &mdash; or perhaps more accurately Canada&#8217;s lack of policies &mdash; on China: There were many things that history might find regrettable about the Mulroney years but I doubt that it will fault him for having a principled and coherent foreign policy. That all changed with Jean Chr\u00e9tien, who was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,22,25,53],"tags":[766,432,769,887,1464],"class_list":["post-53255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-china","category-economics","category-politics","tag-democracy","tag-diplomacy","tag-jeanchretien","tag-justintrudeau","tag-xijinping"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-dQX","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53255"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53255\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53256,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53255\/revisions\/53256"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}