{"id":51555,"date":"2023-12-31T01:00:03","date_gmt":"2023-12-31T06:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=51555"},"modified":"2023-12-30T09:22:51","modified_gmt":"2023-12-30T14:22:51","slug":"qotd-orwell-as-a-failed-prophet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2023\/12\/31\/qotd-orwell-as-a-failed-prophet\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Orwell as a “failed prophet”"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Some critics do not fault [Nineteen Eighty-Four<\/em>] on artistic grounds, but rather judge its vision of the future as wildly off-base. For them, Orwell is a na\u00efve prophet. Treating Orwell as a failed forecaster of futuristic trends, some professional “futurologists” have catalogued no fewer than 160 “predictions” that they claim are identifiable in Orwell’s allegedly poorly imagined novel, pertaining to the technical gadgetry, the geopolitical alignments, and the historical timetable.<\/p>\n

Admittedly, if Orwell was aiming to prophesy, he misfired. Oceania is a world in which the ruling elite espouses no ideology except the brutal insistence that “might makes right”. Tyrannical regimes today still promote ideological orthodoxy \u2014 and punish public protest, organized dissidence, and conspicuous deviation. (Just ask broad swaths of the citizenry in places such as North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, and mainland China.) Moreover, the Party in Oceania mostly ignores “the proles”. Barely able to subsist, they are regarded by the regime as harmless. The Party does not bother to monitor or indoctrinate them, which is not at all the case with the “Little Brothers” that have succeeded Hitler and Stalin on the world stage.<\/p>\n

Rather than promulgate ideological doctrines and dogmas, the Party of Oceania exalts power, promotes leader worship, and builds cults of personality. In Room 101, O’Brien douses Winston’s vestigial hope to resist the brainwashing or at least to leave some scrap of a legacy that might give other rebels hope. “Imagine,” declares O’Brien, “a boot stamping on a human face \u2014 forever.” That is the future, he says, and nothing else. Hatred in Oceania is fomented by periodic “Hate Week” rallies where the Outer Party members bleat “Two Minutes Hate” chants, threatening death to the ever-changing enemy. (Critics of the Trump rallies during and since the presidential campaign compare the chants of his supporters \u2014 such as “Lock Her Up” about “Crooked Hillary” Clinton and her alleged crimes \u2014 to the Hate Week rallies in Nineteen Eighty-Four<\/em>.)<\/p>\n

Yet all of these complaints about the purported shortcomings of Nineteen Eighty-Four<\/em> miss the central point. If Orwell “erred” in his predictions about the future, that was predictable \u2014 because he wasn’t aiming to “predict” or “forecast” the future. His book was not a prophecy; it was \u2014 and remains \u2014 a warning. Furthermore, the warning expressed by Orwell was so potent that this work of fiction helped prevent such a dire future from being realized. So effective were the sirens of the sentinel that the predictions of the “prophet” never were fulfilled.<\/p>\n

Nineteen Eighty-Four<\/em> voices Orwell’s still-relevant warning of what might have happened if certain global trends of the early postwar era had continued. And these trends \u2014 privacy invasion, corruption of language, cultural drivel and mental debris (prolefeed<\/em>), bowdlerization (or “rectification”) of history, vanquishing of objective truth \u2014 persist in our own time. Orwell was right to warn his readers in the immediate aftermath of the defeat of Hitler and the still regnant Stalin in 1949. And his alarms still resound in the 21st century. Setting aside arguments about forecasting, it is indisputable that surveillance in certain locales, including in the “free” world of the West, resembles Big Brother’s “telescreens” everywhere in Oceania, which undermine all possibility of personal privacy. For instance, in 2013, it was estimated that England had 5.9 million CCTV cameras in operation. The case is comparable in many European and American places, especially in urban centers. (Ironically, it was revealed not long ago that the George Orwell Square in downtown Barcelona \u2014 christened to honor him for his fighting against the fascists in the Spanish Civil War \u2014 boasts several hidden security cameras.)<\/p>\n

Cameras are just one, almost old-fashioned technology that violates our privacy, and our freedoms of speech and association. The power of Amazon, Google, Facebook, and other web systems to track our everyday activities is far beyond anything that Orwell imagined. What would he think of present-day mobile phones?<\/p>\n

John Rodden and John Rossi, “George Orwell Warned Us, But Was Anyone Listening?”, The American Conservative<\/em><\/a>, 2019-10-02.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Some critics do not fault [Nineteen Eighty-Four] on artistic grounds, but rather judge its vision of the future as wildly off-base. For them, Orwell is a na\u00efve prophet. Treating Orwell as a failed forecaster of futuristic trends, some professional “futurologists” have catalogued no fewer than 160 “predictions” that they claim are identifiable in Orwell’s allegedly […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,7,41],"tags":[86,686,354,85,911],"class_list":["post-51555","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-history","category-quotations","tag-criticism","tag-futurism","tag-georgeorwell","tag-sf","tag-surveillance"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-dpx","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51555"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51555\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":86514,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51555\/revisions\/86514"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}