{"id":50943,"date":"2023-09-27T01:00:50","date_gmt":"2023-09-27T05:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=50943"},"modified":"2023-09-26T09:30:59","modified_gmt":"2023-09-26T13:30:59","slug":"qotd-geeks-and-hackers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2023\/09\/27\/qotd-geeks-and-hackers\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Geeks and hackers"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:left; padding: 0px 25px 10px 0px\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"400\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-48672\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png 400w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-50x50.png 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a>One of the interesting things about being a participant-observer anthropologist, as I am, is that you often develop implicit knowledge that doesn&#8217;t become explicit until someone challenges you on it. The seed of this post was on a recent comment thread where I was challenged to specify the difference between a geek and a hacker. And I found that I knew the answer. Geeks are consumers of culture; hackers are producers.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, one doesn&#8217;t expect a &#8220;gaming geek&#8221; or a &#8220;computer geek&#8221; or a &#8220;physics geek&#8221; to actually produce games or software or original physics \u2013 but a &#8220;computer hacker&#8221; is expected to produce software, or (less commonly) hardware customizations or homebrewing. I cannot attest to the use of the terms &#8220;gaming hacker&#8221; or &#8220;physics hacker&#8221;, but I am as certain as of what I had for breakfast that computer hackers would expect a person so labeled to originate games or physics rather than merely being a connoisseur of such things.<\/p>\n<p>One thing that makes this distinction interesting is that it&#8217;s a recently-evolved one. When I first edited the <em>Jargon File<\/em> in 1990, &#8220;geek&#8221; was just beginning a long march towards respectability. It&#8217;s from a Germanic root meaning &#8220;fool&#8221; or &#8220;idiot&#8221; and for a long time was associated with the sort of carnival freak-show performer who bit the heads off chickens. Over the next ten years it became steadily more widely and positively self-applied by people with &#8220;non-mainstream&#8221; interests, especially those centered around computers or gaming or science fiction. From the self-application of &#8220;geek&#8221; by those people it spread to elsewhere in science and engineering, and now even more widely; my wife the attorney and costume historian now uses the terms &#8220;law geek&#8221; and &#8220;costume geek&#8221; and is understood by her peers, but it would have been quite unlikely and a <em>faux pas<\/em> for her to have done that before the last few years.<\/p>\n<p>Because I remembered the pre-1990 history, I resisted calling myself a &#8220;geek&#8221; for a long time, but I stopped around 2005-2006 \u2013 after most other techies, but before it became a term my wife&#8217;s non-techie peers used politely. The sting has been drawn from the word. And it&#8217;s useful when I want to emphasize what I have in common with have in common with other geeks, rather than pointing at the more restricted category of &#8220;hacker&#8221;. All hackers are, almost by definition, geeks \u2013 but the reverse is not true.<\/p>\n<p>The word &#8220;hacker&#8221;, of course, has long been something of a cultural football. Part of the rise of &#8220;geek&#8221; in the 1990s was probably due to hackers deciding they couldn&#8217;t fight journalistic corruption of the term to refer to computer criminals \u2013 crackers. But the tremendous growth and increase in prestige of the hacker culture since 1997, consequent on the success of the open-source movement, has given the hackers a stronger position from which to assert and reclaim that label from abuse than they had before. I track this from the reactions I get when I explain it to journalists \u2013 rather more positive, and much more willing to accept a hacker-lexicographer&#8217;s authority to pronounce on the matter, than in the early to mid-1990s when I was first doing that gig.<\/p>\n<p>Eric S. Raymond, <a href=\"http:\/\/esr.ibiblio.org\/?p=2856\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">&#8220;Geeks, hackers, nerds, and crackers: on language boundaries&#8221;, <em>Armed and Dangerous<\/em><\/a>, 2011-01-09.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the interesting things about being a participant-observer anthropologist, as I am, is that you often develop implicit knowledge that doesn&#8217;t become explicit until someone challenges you on it. The seed of this post was on a recent comment thread where I was challenged to specify the difference between a geek and a hacker. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,41,15],"tags":[209,262,1235,129,400],"class_list":["post-50943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gaming","category-quotations","category-technology","tag-anthropology","tag-culture","tag-esr","tag-hack","tag-language"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-dfF","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50943"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":84957,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50943\/revisions\/84957"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}