{"id":46441,"date":"2019-01-11T03:00:04","date_gmt":"2019-01-11T08:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=46441"},"modified":"2019-01-10T20:45:51","modified_gmt":"2019-01-11T01:45:51","slug":"it-is-profoundly-stupid-so-most-people-assume-it-cant-be-but-thats-what-the-law-is-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2019\/01\/11\/it-is-profoundly-stupid-so-most-people-assume-it-cant-be-but-thats-what-the-law-is-now\/","title":{"rendered":"“It is profoundly stupid, so most people assume it can\u2019t be. But that\u2019s what the law is now”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Apparently the federal government believes that drinking and driving is such a huge, intractable problem that they’ve decided it’s worth sacrificing your right to privacy in order to combat this scourge<\/a>:<\/p>\n

It may sound unbelievable, but Canada\u2019s revised laws on impaired driving could see police demand breath samples from people in bars, restaurants, or even at home. And if you say no, you could be arrested, face a criminal record, ordered to pay a fine, and subjected to a driving suspension.<\/p>\n

You could be in violation of the impaired driving laws even two hours after you\u2019ve been driving. Now, the onus is on drivers to prove they weren\u2019t impaired when they were on the road.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This isn’t a simple change of rules, it’s a wholesale abandonment of common sense.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you start to drink after you get home, the police show up at your door, they can arrest you, detain you, take you back to the (police station) and you can be convicted because your blood alcohol concentration was over 80 milligrams (per 100 millilitres of blood) in the two hours after you drove.\u201d<\/p>\n

Changes to Section 253 of the Criminal Code of Canada took effect in December giving police greater powers to seek breath samples from drivers who might be driving while impaired.<\/p>\n

Under the new law, police officers no longer need to have a \u201creasonable suspicion\u201d the driver had consumed alcohol. Now, an officer can demand a sample from drivers for any reason at any time.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But there’s no possible way this could be abused, right?<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a serious erosion of civil liberties,\u201d said Toronto criminal defence lawyer Michael Engel, whose practice focuses almost exclusively on impaired driving cases.<\/p>\n

Engel said someone could be unjustly prosecuted. If a disgruntled business associate or spouse called police with a complaint and an officer went to investigate at the persons\u2019 home or place of business, police could demand a breath sample.<\/p>\n

\u201cHusbands or wives in the course of separations would drop the dime on their partner,\u201d Engel said, describing the potential for the law\u2019s abuse by those calling police out of spite, for example.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Apparently the federal government believes that drinking and driving is such a huge, intractable problem that they’ve decided it’s worth sacrificing your right to privacy in order to combat this scourge: It may sound unbelievable, but Canada\u2019s revised laws on impaired driving could see police demand breath samples from people in bars, restaurants, or even […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,84,9,10],"tags":[52,104,111,98,154,217],"class_list":["post-46441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-government","category-law","category-liberty","tag-absurd","tag-booze","tag-cars","tag-police","tag-privacy","tag-rights"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-c53","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46441"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46441\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46442,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46441\/revisions\/46442"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}