{"id":44202,"date":"2018-07-19T06:00:44","date_gmt":"2018-07-19T10:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=44202"},"modified":"2018-07-18T21:10:19","modified_gmt":"2018-07-19T01:10:19","slug":"mucking-around-with-stonehenge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2018\/07\/19\/mucking-around-with-stonehenge\/","title":{"rendered":"Mucking around with Stonehenge"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Many people are still under the impression that Stonehenge was built by the Druids (debunked in <a href=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2017\/09\/25\/the-truth-about-stonehenge-anglophenia-ep-6\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">this video<\/a> by Siobhan Thompson). At least as many people think that the modern day stone circle is an undisturbed historical relic, and that the stones are standing today as and where they have for thousands of years. All the way back in 2001, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/dn310-concrete-evidence\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Emma Young<\/a> did a quick debunking of that theory in <em>New Scientist<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p><div id=\"attachment_44203\" style=\"width: 645px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-in-1877-Wikimedia-Commons.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-44203\" src=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-in-1877-Wikimedia-Commons.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"635\" height=\"349\" class=\"size-full wp-image-44203\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-in-1877-Wikimedia-Commons.jpg 635w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-in-1877-Wikimedia-Commons-150x82.jpg 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-in-1877-Wikimedia-Commons-480x264.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 635px) 100vw, 635px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-44203\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">An early photograph of Stonehenge taken in July 1877 by Philip Rupert Acott<br \/>Via Wikimedia Commons<\/p><\/div><br \/>\n<div id=\"attachment_44204\" style=\"width: 810px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-20080127-Mavratti-Wikimedia-Commons.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-44204\" src=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-20080127-Mavratti-Wikimedia-Commons.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"800\" height=\"600\" class=\"size-full wp-image-44204\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-20080127-Mavratti-Wikimedia-Commons.jpg 800w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-20080127-Mavratti-Wikimedia-Commons-150x113.jpg 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-20080127-Mavratti-Wikimedia-Commons-480x360.jpg 480w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-20080127-Mavratti-Wikimedia-Commons-768x576.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-44204\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo from a similar angle in 2008 showing the extent of reconstruction.<br \/>Via Wikimedia Commons<\/p><\/div><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Most of the one million visitors who visit Stonehenge on Salisbury Plain every year believe they are looking at untouched 4,000-year-old remains. But virtually every stone was re-erected, straightened or embedded in concrete between 1901 and 1964, says a British doctoral student.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat we have been looking at is a 20th-century landscape, reminiscent of what Stonehenge might have looked like thousands of years ago,\u201d says Brian Edwards, a student at the University of the West of England in Bristol.<\/p>\n<p>Stonehenge isn\u2019t the only ancient site to have been transformed in recent years, he says. \u201cEven many of the local people in Avebury weren\u2019t aware that a lot of the stones were put up in the 1930s,\u201d he told <em>New Scientist<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>English Heritage says it is now considering covering the Stonehenge alteration programme in detail in the next edition of its official guidebook to the site. A decision not to include the work in official guides was taken in the 1960s, says Dave Batchelor, English Heritage\u2019s senior archaeologist.<\/p>\n<p>The first restoration project took place in 1901. A leaning stone was straightened and set in concrete, to prevent it falling.<\/p>\n<p>More drastic renovations were carried out in the 1920s. Under the direction of Colonel William Hawley, a member of the Stonehenge Society, six stones were moved and re-erected.<\/p>\n<p>Cranes were used to reposition three more stones in 1958. One giant fallen lintel, or cross stone, was replaced. Then in 1964, four stones were repositioned to prevent them falling.<\/p>\n<p>The 1920s \u2018restoration\u2019 was the most \u201cvigorous\u201d, says Christopher Chippindale of the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. \u201cThe work in the 1920s under Colonel William Crawley is a sad story,\u201d he says.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As I commented on a post back in <a href=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2010\/07\/22\/first-results-from-new-study-around-stonehenge\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">2010<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I imagine, given how many times Stonehenge has been mucked about with by earlier enthusiasts, there must be much misleading data has to be sifted and re-sifted before any definite discoveries can be announced. Stonehenge has been fascinating people for centuries and there are probably lots of amateur investigations that may well have made the situation more confusing (think of a sixteenth century equivalent of Indiana Jones or Lara Croft with a nose for treasure).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.atlasobscura.com\/articles\/victorian-stonehenge-picnic-photos\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Atlas Obscura<\/em><\/a> recently had a set of photos of Stonehenge taken in 1867 likely featuring the family of Colonel Sir Henry James, of the Ordnance Survey. There&#8217;s also a watercolour by John Constable from around 1835 showing a very different, more ruin-y monument:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-by-John-Constable-c.-1835.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-by-John-Constable-c.-1835.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"835\" height=\"538\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-44206\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-by-John-Constable-c.-1835.png 835w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-by-John-Constable-c.-1835-150x97.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-by-John-Constable-c.-1835-480x309.png 480w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Stonehenge-by-John-Constable-c.-1835-768x495.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 835px) 100vw, 835px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Many people are still under the impression that Stonehenge was built by the Druids (debunked in this video by Siobhan Thompson). At least as many people think that the modern day stone circle is an undisturbed historical relic, and that the stones are standing today as and where they have for thousands of years. All [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,7,11,16],"tags":[288,347,855],"class_list":["post-44202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-britain","category-history","category-religion","category-science","tag-archaeology","tag-debunking","tag-polytheism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-buW","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44202"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44202\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44210,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44202\/revisions\/44210"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}