{"id":43176,"date":"2018-05-12T01:00:20","date_gmt":"2018-05-12T05:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=43176"},"modified":"2018-09-18T10:44:25","modified_gmt":"2018-09-18T14:44:25","slug":"qotd-women-in-i-t","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2018\/05\/12\/qotd-women-in-i-t\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Women in I.T."},"content":{"rendered":"

… any woman who wants to be in a STEM field should be able to get as far as talent, hard work, and desire to succeed will take her, without facing artificial barriers erected by prejudice or other factors. If there are women who dream of being in STEM but have felt themselves driven off that path, the system is failing them. And the system is failing itself, too; talent is not so common that we can afford to waste it.<\/p>\n

Now I\u2019m going to refocus on computing, because that\u2019s what I know best and I think it exhibits the problems that keep women out of STEM fields in an extreme form. There\u2019s a lot of political talk that the tiny and decreasing number of women in computing is a result of sexism and prejudice that has to be remedied with measures ranging from sensitivity training up through admission and hiring quotas. This talk is lazy, stupid, wrong, and prevents correct diagnosis of much more serious problems.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t mean to deny that there is still prejudice against women lurking in dark corners of the field. But I\u2019ve known dozens of women in computing who wouldn\u2019t have been shy about telling me if they were running into it, and not one has ever reported it to me as a primary problem. The problems they did<\/em> report were much worse. They centered on one thing: women, in general, are not willing to eat the kind of shit that men will swallow to work in this field.<\/p>\n

Now let\u2019s talk about death marches, mandatory uncompensated overtime, the beeper on the belt, and having no life. Men accept these conditions because they\u2019re easily hooked into a monomaniacal, warrior-ethic way of thinking in which achievement of the mission is everything. Women, not so much. Much sooner than a man would, a woman will ask: \u201cWhy, exactly, am I putting up with this?\u201d<\/p>\n

Correspondingly, young women in computing-related majors show a tendency to tend to bail out that rises directly with their comprehension of what their working life is actually going to be like. Biology is directly implicated here. Women have short fertile periods, and even if they don\u2019t consciously intend to have children their instincts tell them they don\u2019t have the option young men do to piss away years hunting mammoths that aren\u2019t there.<\/p>\n

There are other issues, too, like female unwillingness to put up with working environments full of the shadow-autist types that gravitate to programming. But I think those are minor by comparison, too. If we really want to fix the problem of too few women in computing, we need to ask some much harder questions about how the field treats everyone<\/em> in it.<\/p>\n

Eric S. Raymond, “Women in computing: first, get the problem right”, Armed and Dangerous<\/em><\/a>, 2010-07-15.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

… any woman who wants to be in a STEM field should be able to get as far as talent, hard work, and desire to succeed will take her, without facing artificial barriers erected by prejudice or other factors. If there are women who dream of being in STEM but have felt themselves driven off […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[831,41],"tags":[109,1235,95,43],"class_list":["post-43176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business","category-quotations","tag-computers","tag-esr","tag-jobs","tag-women"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-beo","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43176"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43176\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43177,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43176\/revisions\/43177"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}