{"id":42852,"date":"2018-03-29T03:00:57","date_gmt":"2018-03-29T07:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=42852"},"modified":"2018-03-28T13:58:21","modified_gmt":"2018-03-28T17:58:21","slug":"google-facebook-anti-trust-laws-and-the-network-effect","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2018\/03\/29\/google-facebook-anti-trust-laws-and-the-network-effect\/","title":{"rendered":"Google, Facebook, anti-trust laws, and the Network Effect"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Google and Facebook (and other, lesser, social media companies) have a lot of information on you. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/iamdylancurran\/status\/977559925680467968\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Lots and lots and lots of information on you<\/a>. Many people are coming to the conclusion that this is bad, bad news and <strong>&#8220;something must be done&#8221;<\/strong>. Politicians and activists share a tendency to respond to such demands by pushing &#8220;something&#8221; they already favour as the solution to the popular demand for action. A few days ago, the &#8220;something&#8221; seemed to be <a href=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2018\/03\/24\/today-in-bad-ideas-examined-time-to-nationalize-regulate-break-up-facebook\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">some form of anti-trust action<\/a> over the social media giants.<\/p>\n<p>In the <em>Continental Telegraph<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.continentaltelegraph.com\/2018\/03\/27\/our-tech-regulation-problem-monopolies-with-network-effects-benefit-consumers\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Tim Worstall<\/a> explains why an over-the-top anti-trust offensive is likely to leave everyone in a worse state than the <em>status quo<\/em>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Which brings us to the tech companies of today:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><em>Big Tech May Be Monopolistic, But It\u2019s Good for Consumers<\/em><\/strong><\/div>\n<p>Quite so, thus no antitrust actions should or need be taken.<\/p>\n<p>At the first level there\u2019s the simple point that Facebook, Google a little less, Microsoft, e-Bay, they benefit from network effects. The more people who use them the more attractive they become to the next user. Meaning that size, in and of itself, creates yet more size. That\u2019s just what we mean by network effects.<\/p>\n<p>In turn that also means that the efficient size of an organisation here is that global monopoly. It isn\u2019t true in most cases because there are diseconomies of scale as well as economies of it, but another way to describe network effects is just that we\u2019re insisting that the -economies outweigh the dis- at scales up to and including 7 billion people.<\/p>\n<p>In that first reading of antitrust that would mean they gain economic power and thus government must step in. In our second reading that\u2019s not enough.<\/p>\n<p>Firstly, the monopolists must exercise that economic power they have. Something not greatly in evidence as just having power doesn\u2019t mean it can be exercised. For when you do try to, say, raise prices can someone come in and try to undercut you? If so you\u2019ve got contestable economic power, or even a contestable monopoly. As an example, think the Chinese and rare earths. They were producing some 97% of the world\u2019s supply. So, they decided to play silly buggers, exercise that power. It took a couple of years but two new mines opened, China\u2019s share of rare earths fell and prices halved, below their original point. People contested that Chinese economic power when China tried to exercise it. China didn\u2019t win either.<\/p>\n<p>If Google tried to raise the price of adverts then business would flow away from them. If Facebook started charging for access then there wouldn\u2019t be a Facebook. They\u2019ve got contestable monopolies.<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Sure, we should keep a wary eye open and if the consumer is being gouged then we could and should do something. But while we\u2019ve got efficient companies, monopolies or not, benefiting consumers then the correct response is to get the hell out of the way.<\/p>\n<p>Unless you\u2019re a politician who simply wants to expand the powers politicians have over society \u2013 something which explains most politicians \u2013 but then we can tell them to go boil their heads. Only the exercise of economic power to the disbenefit of consumers justifies intervention.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Google and Facebook (and other, lesser, social media companies) have a lot of information on you. Lots and lots and lots of information on you. Many people are coming to the conclusion that this is bad, bad news and &#8220;something must be done&#8221;. Politicians and activists share a tendency to respond to such demands by [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[831,25,28,15],"tags":[391,328,469,1136,154,661,593],"class_list":["post-42852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business","category-economics","category-media","category-technology","tag-facebook","tag-google","tag-monopolies","tag-networkeffect","tag-privacy","tag-regulation","tag-socialmedia"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-b9a","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42852"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42852\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42854,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42852\/revisions\/42854"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}