{"id":42432,"date":"2020-05-18T01:00:32","date_gmt":"2020-05-18T05:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=42432"},"modified":"2020-07-13T10:45:05","modified_gmt":"2020-07-13T14:45:05","slug":"qotd-science-evidence-and-cognitive-creationism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2020\/05\/18\/qotd-science-evidence-and-cognitive-creationism\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Science, evidence and &#8220;cognitive creationism&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:left; padding: 0px 15px 0px 0px\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"400\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-48672\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png 400w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-50x50.png 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a>I wrote about this problem in one of my <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/science-denial-versus-science-pleasure\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Scientific American<\/em> monthly columns<\/a> recently, noting that both the Right and the Left distort science in the service of their ideology. On the Right we see the denial of evolution, vaccinations, stem cell research, and global warming. On the Left we see the distortion or denial of GMOs, nuclear power, genetic engineering, and evolutionary psychology, the latter of which I have called &#8220;cognitive creationism&#8221; for its endorsement of a blank slate model of the mind in which natural selection only operated on humans from the neck down.<\/p>\n<p>What can we do about this problem? First, we must acknowledge that for most issues most conservatives and liberals are pro-science. Recent surveys show that over 90 percent of both Republicans and Democrats in the U.S., for example, agreed that &#8220;science and technology give more opportunities&#8221; and that &#8220;science makes our lives better.&#8221; In other words, anti-science attitudes are formed in very narrow cognitive windows \u2014 those in which science appears to oppose certain political or religious views. Knowledge of a subject helps a little. For example, those who know more about climate science are slightly more likely to accept that global warming is real and human-caused than those who know less on the subject. But that modest effect is not only erased when political ideology is factored in, it has an opposite effect on one end of the political spectrum. For Republicans, the more knowledge they have about climate science the <em>less likely<\/em> they are to accept the theory of anthropogenic global warming (while Democrats&#8217; confidence goes up).<\/p>\n<p>In another <em>Scientific American<\/em> column I wrote about this &#8220;backfire&#8221; effect, in which the more information you give someone that contradicts a cherished belief, the less likely they are to change their mind; in fact, they double-down on the belief. But this only applies to important political, religious, or ideological beliefs.<\/p>\n<p>If you don&#8217;t have a dog in the fight then the facts can change your mind. But the cognitive dissonance created by facts counter to beliefs by which you define yourself will almost always be resolved by spin-doctoring the facts, not by changing your mind. Thus, when I engage in debate or conversation with creationists, for example, I don&#8217;t give them the choice between Darwin and Jesus, because I know who&#8217;s going to lose that one. Instead, I try to convince them that evolution was God&#8217;s way of creation, just like people in Newton&#8217;s time and after came to believe that gravity was God&#8217;s way of creating solar systems. I don&#8217;t believe that myself, of course, but the point is to get people to embrace science, not to win an argument. With climate deniers, I know from research and personal experience that when they hear &#8220;global warming&#8221; they think &#8220;anti-capitalism,&#8221; &#8220;anti-freedom,&#8221; &#8220;anti-American way of life.&#8221; So I take that off the table by showing them how investing in green technology is going to be one of the most lucrative enterprises in the history of capitalism. I call this the Elon Musk Model.<\/p>\n<p>Michael Shermer, interviewed by Claire Lehmann, <a href=\"http:\/\/quillette.com\/2018\/02\/24\/skeptical-optimist-interview-michael-shermer\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;The Skeptical Optimist: Interview with Michael Shermer&#8221;, <em>Quillette<\/em><\/a>, 2018-02-24.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I wrote about this problem in one of my Scientific American monthly columns recently, noting that both the Right and the Left distort science in the service of their ideology. On the Right we see the denial of evolution, vaccinations, stem cell research, and global warming. On the Left we see the distortion or denial [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[53,41,16,13],"tags":[1364,827,240,622,39,1386],"class_list":["post-42432","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-quotations","category-science","category-usa","tag-cognitivedissonance","tag-genetics","tag-globalwarming","tag-ideology","tag-junkscience","tag-nuclearpower"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-b2o","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42432","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42432"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42432\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57215,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42432\/revisions\/57215"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42432"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42432"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42432"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}