{"id":41486,"date":"2020-03-10T01:00:14","date_gmt":"2020-03-10T05:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=41486"},"modified":"2020-03-09T09:07:00","modified_gmt":"2020-03-09T13:07:00","slug":"qotd-free-trade-versus-protectionism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2020\/03\/10\/qotd-free-trade-versus-protectionism\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Free trade versus protectionism"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a> It is a myth that free trade is unproven in practice. Forget that countries with freer trade have both higher per-capita incomes<\/a> and faster rates of economic growth<\/a>. Look instead at the essentials of the case. Each and every day you trade freely with many merchants. Do you think that you and your family would be enriched if your neighbor extracted punitive payments from you whenever you buy some item that your neighbor judges to be from a seller located too distant from your neighborhood? Every day Arizonans trade freely with Texans and Rhode Islanders. Do you think that Arizonans would be enriched if the government of that state obstructed their ability to trade as they choose with people located in other states?<\/p>\n

People trade freely countless times, each and every day. Yes, yes, I’m well aware that such trade isn’t ideally free. Occupational-licensing restrictions, for example, unjustly and harmfully obstruct domestic trade. But the fact remains that today within<\/em> each country \u2013 including within the U.S. \u2013 trade is not typically obstructed based on geographic location or political boundaries. And therefore people buy and sell freely within<\/em> countries. If the case for a policy of free trade were not practical \u2013 if it were only a theoretical curiosity \u2013 then it would be true that ordinary people would be even richer if the state obstructed their abilities to trade with each other domestically.<\/p>\n

It’s a myth also that the economic case for a policy of free trade in any one country requires that other governments also practice free trade. The case for a policy of free trade is, at bottom, a case for unilateral<\/em> free trade: while nearly everyone in the world would be better off if all governments adopted policies of free trade, nearly everyone in the home country would be better off if the home government adopts a policy of free trade regardless of the policies of other governments.<\/p>\n

Protectionism is a nasty mash of logical fallacies, half-truths, hubris, economic ignorance, and cronyist apologetics.<\/p>\n

Don Boudreaux, “Quotation of the Day\u2026”, Caf\u00e9 Hayek<\/em><\/a>, 2017-12-18.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It is a myth that free trade is unproven in practice. Forget that countries with freer trade have both higher per-capita incomes and faster rates of economic growth. Look instead at the essentials of the case. Each and every day you trade freely with many merchants. Do you think that you and your family would […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,84,41],"tags":[316,320,266],"class_list":["post-41486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-government","category-quotations","tag-borders","tag-freetrade","tag-protectionism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-aN8","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41486"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41486\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55539,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41486\/revisions\/55539"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}