{"id":40422,"date":"2017-10-09T03:00:30","date_gmt":"2017-10-09T07:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=40422"},"modified":"2017-10-08T10:24:45","modified_gmt":"2017-10-08T14:24:45","slug":"what-does-predictive-processing-have-to-do-with-religious-experiences","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2017\/10\/09\/what-does-predictive-processing-have-to-do-with-religious-experiences\/","title":{"rendered":"What does “predictive processing” have to do with religious experiences?"},"content":{"rendered":"

ESR<\/a> linked to this article by Connor Wood<\/a>, saying “This is the best job of synthesis\/summary I’ve ever seen on the topic”:<\/p>\n

The theory of predictive processing posits that much of the brain\u2019s activity is geared toward building and correcting internal models using feedback from both the body and the environment. This goes for everything from basic motor acts, like reaching for a cup, to more complicated, higher-level experiences like taking part in a religious service.<\/p>\n

For example, if you reach for a cup and saucer, your brain uses feed-forward<\/em> models to generate internal simulations of the consequences of that motor action, and it uses feedback<\/em> to correct those simulations if those predicted consequences don\u2019t actually match what happens.<\/p>\n

Say you\u2019re on a cruise ship. The seas are rough and the ship is heaving to and fro, so your cup slides a few inches away on the table as you reach for it. The simulated prediction your brain had generated falls flat. Fortunately, you\u2019re probably able to grasp the cup in its new position, because your brain uses that sensory feedback to hastily update its model of your body\u2019s relationship to the room, including your table, cup, and saucer. It even incorporates the rhythmic seesawing of the ship into its models.<\/p>\n

(Incidentally, this is part of why you get \u201csea legs\u201d after you\u2019ve been onboard a boat or ship for a few hours \u2013 your brain has learned to dynamically compensate for the constant, rhythmic rocking of the boat. Then, when you set foot back on dry land, your motor repertoire is still trying to match the rhythm of the waves, but there are no waves to match. So you feel wobbly, as the electro-chemical memory of the ocean sloshes around inside your nervous system, telling your brain to expect and compensate for a rhythmic rocking that isn\u2019t there anymore.)<\/p>\n

According to van Elk and Aleman, this cognitive process of constantly building and correcting models \u2013 or selectively failing to correct them \u2013 may explain a lot of what we call religious phenomena. How? A core feature of their model is that religious experiences emerge from changes in how the brain processes the external (or exteroceptive<\/em>) versus the internal (or interoceptive<\/em>) data that it receives.<\/p>\n

For example, they describe intense experiences of personal prayer as resulting from more intense focus on interoceptive signals. Inward focus enables us to simulate the internal mental processes of other people, creating predictive models of what we would likely be feeling, or what plans we\u2019d probably be hatching, if we were in their circumstances. So, when we\u2019re highly focused on our own interoceptive signals, we may be more primed to attribute mental and emotional states to others \u2013 even imaginary or invisible others. In the prediction processing model, then, personal prayer \u2013 talking to God or gods \u2013 involves focusing so intently on our own internal experiences that we become easily able to attribute mental states, emotions, and desires to whatever divine being we (believe we) are engaging with.<\/p>\n

Mystical experiences are another type of religious phenomenon, one that\u2019s often characterized by feelings of expansiveness or loss of identification with one\u2019s own ego or consciousness. In the predictive processing model, mystical experience \u2013 unlike personal prayer \u2013 is most likely to result from an increased attention to exteroceptive<\/em> data. That is, the brain becomes focused on external sense data to the exclusion of internal information, and this absorption in external input actually decouples the brain\u2019s self-understanding from its own bodily signals. As a result, one suddenly seems to exist outside of, or to transcend, the body.<\/p>\n

Read more at http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/scienceonreligion\/2017\/09\/predictive-processing-religion\/#sxXKrZ2pPzXWMCUw.99<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ESR linked to this article by Connor Wood, saying “This is the best job of synthesis\/summary I’ve ever seen on the topic”: The theory of predictive processing posits that much of the brain\u2019s activity is geared toward building and correcting internal models using feedback from both the body and the environment. This goes for everything […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,16],"tags":[348,139],"class_list":["post-40422","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-religion","category-science","tag-paranormal","tag-psychology"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-avY","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40422","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40422"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40422\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40423,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40422\/revisions\/40423"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}