{"id":40218,"date":"2017-09-19T06:00:29","date_gmt":"2017-09-19T10:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=40218"},"modified":"2017-10-20T13:58:04","modified_gmt":"2017-10-20T17:58:04","slug":"ontario-is-getting-exactly-what-they-deserve-in-legalized-marijuana","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2017\/09\/19\/ontario-is-getting-exactly-what-they-deserve-in-legalized-marijuana\/","title":{"rendered":"Ontario is getting exactly<\/em> what they deserve in legalized marijuana"},"content":{"rendered":"

Pessimists, you can collect your winnings at the till. Optimists? Haven’t you learned yet? You expected<\/em> a vibrant, dynamic free market in pot where your favourite budtender would be able to offer you a wide selection of high quality product to choose from? Forget it, Jake, it’s Ontario. Chris Selley<\/a> explains why the pessimists got it right in the betting on how Ontario would choose to implement the legal marijuana market in 2018:<\/p>\n

For nearly 15 years, I and other free market lunatics have been trying to impress upon Ontarians just how insane our liquor retail system is. Yet we still hear the same ludicrous arguments in its favour. \u201cThe LCBO makes tons of money for the province.\u201d (Alberta makes tons of money from liquor sales too, without owning a single store.) \u201cPublic employees can be trusted to keep booze out of children\u2019s hands.\u201d (The Beer Store isn\u2019t public. Nor are the scores of privately run \u201cagency stores\u201d in rural areas across Ontario.) \u201cThe LCBO provides good jobs.\u201d (Not to real product experts it doesn\u2019t \u2014 they would be far better off in a free market jurisdiction. And if the government\u2019s role is to make good retail jobs, why not nationalize groceries?) \u201cLCBO stores are pleasant. Liquor stores in the U.S. are gross.\u201d (Nope! You\u2019re just going to the wrong liquor stores.)<\/p>\n

This hopeless mess is the foundation for Ontario\u2019s new marijuana plan \u2014 and we\u2019re hearing the same arguments in its favour. Last week, two columnists in the Toronto Star<\/em> and one in the Globe and Mail<\/em> spoke approvingly of the fact it would create \u201cgood unionized jobs.\u201d The two Star<\/em> columnists also mentioned the money that would accrue to the treasury.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m fine with the profits going to the public purse instead of private businesspeople,\u201d wrote one.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhy wouldn\u2019t the government seek to maximize revenues in the same way that it profits from alcohol and tobacco sales?\u201d asked the other.<\/p>\n

Even after all these years, it makes me want to tear my hair out: for the love of heaven, the \u201chigh-paying jobs\u201d motive and the \u201cprofit\u201d motive are at odds with each other. You cannot claim both as priorities. One way or the other, the government will take its cut on marijuana sales. The overhead costs of running its own stores, paying its own employees government wages, will simply eat into that cut.<\/p>\n

If you can live with Ontario\u2019s liquor situation, but you think your favourite budtender should be able to get a government licence to keep her \u201cdispensary\u201d up and running after legalization kicks in, my sympathy is non-existent. You either support consumer choice or you don\u2019t. Ontario doesn\u2019t, and that will never change until tipplers and tokers take up arms together.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pessimists, you can collect your winnings at the till. Optimists? Haven’t you learned yet? You expected a vibrant, dynamic free market in pot where your favourite budtender would be able to offer you a wide selection of high quality product to choose from? Forget it, Jake, it’s Ontario. Chris Selley explains why the pessimists got […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,84,9],"tags":[395,83,87,661],"class_list":["post-40218","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-government","category-law","tag-lcbo","tag-marijuana","tag-ontario","tag-regulation"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-asG","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40218","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40218"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40218\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40539,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40218\/revisions\/40539"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40218"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40218"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40218"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}