{"id":38805,"date":"2017-06-08T03:00:21","date_gmt":"2017-06-08T07:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=38805"},"modified":"2017-06-02T16:05:14","modified_gmt":"2017-06-02T20:05:14","slug":"shoes-and-changing-tastes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2017\/06\/08\/shoes-and-changing-tastes\/","title":{"rendered":"Shoes and changing tastes"},"content":{"rendered":"

Virginia Postrel<\/a> says that the market for shoes is changing rapidly, and men are poised to take over as the largest sector of the American shoe-buying market:<\/p>\n

The Sex and the City<\/em> stereotype of the shoe enthusiast as a fashionista with a passion for high heels is seriously out of date. Today\u2019s shoe collector is probably buying sneakers and is quite likely male. Shoes may have as much glamour as ever, but it\u2019s not the kind Christian Louboutin would recognize.<\/p>\n

If current trends continue, men\u2019s U.S. shoe sales will soon surpass women\u2019s. At $26.2 billion in 2016 versus $29.9 billion for women\u2019s footwear, \u201cmen\u2019s is closer in size to women\u2019s than it\u2019s ever been,\u201d says Beth Goldstein, fashion footwear and accessories analyst at the NPD Group. Women\u2019s sales are shrinking as men\u2019s continue to rise, in both revenue and number of pairs sold.<\/p>\n

Behind the sales figures is a cultural shift. As dress becomes more casual, habits are converging, with women buying more versatile styles while men expand their shoe collections.<\/p>\n

Traditionally, men got more wear out of any given pair of shoes. \u201cIf you\u2019re getting a pair of desert boots or brogues, you can wear those every day, all day, all year,\u201d says Andrew Luecke, a New York-based menswear writer and co-author of the new book \u201cCool: Style, Sound, and Subversion.\u201d \u201cA pair of Louboutin stilettos? Not so wearable.\u201d<\/p>\n

That\u2019s changing, however. Instead of picking up sandals in the spring and boots in the fall, women are buying shoes they can wear year-round, such as ankle boots and sneakers. Their purchase patterns now look more like men\u2019s. That\u2019s bad news for retailers who count on seasonal lines to drive purchases.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the rise of sneakers as all-occasion footwear is encouraging men to build their wardrobes while depressing women\u2019s sales. \u201cMen have the tendency to collect things,\u201d observes Luecke. \u201cOnce it was baseball cards. Now it\u2019s sneakers. If you\u2019re collecting, you can\u2019t have too many sneakers.\u201d And if you\u2019re not into sneakers, you can buy shoes to go with your favorite pastime — camping, fishing, rock climbing, snowshoeing, whatever. They aren\u2019t frivolous fashion; they\u2019re serious gear!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I don’t buy shoes too often … I think I bought a pair of leather shoes in 2015 and a pair of court shoes for badminton the year before that. I have no immediate plans to add to my collection, so I guess it’s up to all of you chaps to make up the difference.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Virginia Postrel says that the market for shoes is changing rapidly, and men are poised to take over as the largest sector of the American shoe-buying market: The Sex and the City stereotype of the shoe enthusiast as a fashionista with a passion for high heels is seriously out of date. Today\u2019s shoe collector is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[831,13],"tags":[618],"class_list":["post-38805","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business","category-usa","tag-clothing"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-a5T","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38805","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38805"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38805\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38806,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38805\/revisions\/38806"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}