{"id":38683,"date":"2017-05-27T03:00:28","date_gmt":"2017-05-27T07:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=38683"},"modified":"2018-06-16T12:53:42","modified_gmt":"2018-06-16T16:53:42","slug":"canadas-hollow-army","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2017\/05\/27\/canadas-hollow-army\/","title":{"rendered":"Canada’s hollow army"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"Thanks to a post at Army.ca<\/em>, here is the rough outline of the NATO battle group<\/a> that Canada will be leading in Latvia later this summer (oddly lacking in attached artillery support):<\/p>\n

… the Canadian-led battalion level battle group will be composed of about 1,138 soldiers, as well as armor, armored transport and combat support. Of that number, 450 will be Canadian mechanized infantry bringing with them armored vehicles and various support elements. A specialized Canadian reconnaissance platoon will also be on the ground. Albania will send 18 combat (explosive ordnance disposal) engineers. Italy will send a mechanized infantry company consisting of 160 soldiers plus armored fighting vehicles. Poland will send a tank company with 160 troops. Slovenia will send 50 soldiers specializing in defense against weapons of mass destruction, (chemical, biological and nuclear weapon defense, decontamination operations etc). Spain will send the second-largest contingent: 300 soldiers from a mechanized infantry company and armored vehicles, combat engineers and support elements.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As Ted Campbell<\/a> points out, this is an odd and unwieldy formation and seems unnecessarily multi-national for such a small tasking. Why isn’t the Canadian Army just sending a full battalion with the necessary supporting troops (artillery, armour, engineers, medical and logistics, etc.) to minimize operational and linguistic friction? It’s because we don’t have<\/em> enough troops to do that successfully:<\/p>\n

\"\"There is an old, tried and true, military expression to describe this: \u201cit\u2019s a dog\u2019s bloody breakfast!\u201d Can you imagine trying to command and control that organization? Especially under NATO\u2019s rules that, as we saw in Afghanistan, allow each country to impose caveats on what where when and how its forces may be told<\/strike> asked to do anything at all.<\/p>\n

So how did we, Canada, get to this? How is it that we cannot, it appears, deploy a complete battle group without Albanian, Italian, Polish, Solvenian and Spanish troops? After all, we had a full battle group in Afghanistan just five years ago, didn\u2019t we?<\/p>\n

Well, yes, but \u2026<\/p>\n

First, a \u201cbattle group\u201d is rarely a formed unit (never in the Canadian Army). It is, usually, either a full up armoured (tank) regiment or infantry battalion with add-ons: tanks or infantry, artillery in direct support, engineers and so on and so forth. Our battle group in Afghanistan was always based on one of Canada\u2019s nine infantry battalions with attachments from a tank regiment, an artillery regiment and so on. But even the infantry battalion, the \u201cbase\u201d of the battle group had to be augmented. Canada has not had one, single, full strength, properly organized and equipped infantry battalion for more than a decade. A battalion ought to have 950\u00b1 soldiers and its own, organic, mortars, heavy machine guns, anti-tank or assault weapons, and, and , and \u2026 but many years ago, in an effort to \u201cbalance\u201d the army the infantry was (stupidly) stripped of its mortars ~ the artillery will take care of it, it was said \u2026 and, bless \u2019em, the gunners have not let the infantry down, but that doesn\u2019t mean the decision to strip the mortars, especially, from the infantry made any military sense at all. It didn\u2019t; it was a dumb decision ~ the wrong thing for all the wrong reasons. But, a good friend tells, me, the prevailing view in the Army, especially, is that nothing must ever be cut because it will never, ever be gotten back. Thus we strip the battalions but leave the empty shells ~ a Canadian battalions circa 2017 has 500+ soldiers, not the 1,000- it needs. Even at the height of the Afghan campaign, when Major General (then Lieutenant Colonel) Omer Lavoie led Operation Medusa<\/em><\/strong> (you know, the one which Harjit Sajan said he conceived<\/em> as \u201cthe architect\u201d) his battalion, the 1st Battalion of the Royal Canadian Regiment 1RCR) had to be augmented with a company from the Princess Patricia\u2019s Canadian Light Infantry because there were not enough companies in all three of the RCR battalions that had not been deployed within the last 18 months \u2026 the Army, in other words, had been hollowed out for years, even decades.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Thanks to a post at Army.ca, here is the rough outline of the NATO battle group that Canada will be leading in Latvia later this summer (oddly lacking in attached artillery support): … the Canadian-led battalion level battle group will be composed of about 1,138 soldiers, as well as armor, armored transport and combat support. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,5],"tags":[218,448,1103,800,220,1211],"class_list":["post-38683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-military","tag-afghanistan","tag-canadianforces","tag-infantry","tag-latvia","tag-nato","tag-potemkinvillage"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-a3V","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38683"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38683\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38688,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38683\/revisions\/38688"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}