{"id":38653,"date":"2017-05-24T05:00:09","date_gmt":"2017-05-24T09:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=38653"},"modified":"2017-05-23T17:25:39","modified_gmt":"2017-05-23T21:25:39","slug":"will-it-be-more-mourning-sickness-or-will-it-be-anger-this-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2017\/05\/24\/will-it-be-more-mourning-sickness-or-will-it-be-anger-this-time\/","title":{"rendered":"Will it be more Mourning Sickness, or will it be anger this time?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Brendan O’Neill<\/a> on the reactions to the Manchester bomb attack on Monday after a pop concert:<\/p>\n

After the terror, the platitudes. And the hashtags. And the candlelit vigils. And they always have the same message: \u2018Be unified. Feel love. Don\u2019t give in to hate.\u2019 The banalities roll off the national tongue. Vapidity abounds. A shallow fetishisation of \u2018togetherness\u2019 takes the place of any articulation of what we should be together for \u2013 and against. And so it has been after the barbarism in Manchester. In response to the deaths of more than 20 people at an Ariana Grande gig, in response to the massacre of children enjoying pop music<\/em>, people effectively say: \u2018All you need is love.\u2019 The disparity between these horrors and our response to them, between what happened and what we say, is vast. This has to change.<\/p>\n

It is becoming clear that the top-down promotion of a hollow \u2018togetherness\u2019 in response to terrorism is about cultivating passivity. It is about suppressing strong public feeling. It\u2019s about reducing us to a line of mourners whose only job is to weep for our fellow citizens, not ask why they died, or rage against their dying. The great fear of both officialdom and the media class in the wake of terror attacks is that the volatile masses will turn wild and hateful. This is why every attack is followed by warnings of an \u2018Islamophobic backlash\u2019 and heightened policing of speech on Twitter and gatherings in public: because what they fundamentally fear is public passion, our<\/em> passion. They want us passive, empathetic, upset, not angry, active, questioning. They prefer us as a lonely crowd of dutiful, disconnected mourners rather than a real collective of citizens demanding to know why our fellow citizens died and how we might prevent others from dying. We should stop playing the role they\u2019ve allotted us.<\/p>\n

As part of the post-terror narrative, our emotions are closely policed. Some emotions are celebrated, others demonised. Empathy \u2013 good. Grief \u2013 good. Sharing your sadness online \u2013 great. But hatred? Anger? Fury? These are bad. They are inferior forms of feeling, apparently, and must be discouraged. Because if we green-light anger about terrorism, then people will launch pogroms against Muslims, they say, or even attack Sikhs or the local Hindu-owned cornershop, because that\u2019s how stupid and hateful we apparently are. But there is a strong justification for hate right now. Certainly for anger. For rage, in fact. Twenty-two of our fellow citizens were killed at a pop concert. I hate that, I hate the person who did it, I hate those who will apologise for it, and I hate the ideology that underpins such barbarism. I want to destroy that ideology. I don\u2019t feel sad, I feel apoplectic. Others will feel likewise, but if they express this verboten post-terror emotion they risk being branded as architects of hate, contributors to future terrorist acts, racist, and so on. Their fury is shushed. \u2018Just weep. That\u2019s your role.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The fear about the inevitable backlash on the part of us backward, ignorant, intolerant westerners has been a standing joke for more than a decade, as Mark Steyn noted back in 2006<\/a>:<\/p>\n

I believe the old definition of a nanosecond was the gap between a New York traffic light changing to green and the first honk of a driver behind you. Today, the definition of a nanosecond is the gap between a western terrorist incident and the press release of a Muslim lobby group warning of an impending outbreak of Islamophobia. After the London Tube bombings, Angus Jung sent the Aussie pundit Tim Blair a note-perfect parody of the typical newspaper headline:<\/p>\n

British Muslims Fear Repercussions Over Tomorrow\u2019s Train Bombing.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Ace of Spades H.Q.<\/em><\/a> reports on the alleged bomber’s identity:<\/p>\n

Manchester Suicide Bomber Named: Gary “The Garester” Eddington<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nah just fuckin wit ya, it’s Salman Abedi<\/a>, and the keening cries warning against #Backlash! have begun.<\/p>\n

Question: Why is there never a warning about Backlash before the suspect is named?<\/p>\n

Answer: Because if the suspect turns out to be one of the few the media can claim are “right wing” (Nazis, etc.), then the media does not warn against backlash, but actively crusades in favor of it.<\/p>\n

If this guy turned out to be anything that could be plausibly mischaracterized as right wing — tweeted in favor of Brexit, etc. — the media would be blaming this right now on Donald Trump and his supporters, and demanding they take accountability for their hatred.<\/p>\n

But, it’s not, so the media set down its “Backlash is Good and Necessary” script and picked up its “Backlash is Bad” script.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Brendan O’Neill on the reactions to the Manchester bomb attack on Monday after a pop concert: After the terror, the platitudes. And the hashtags. And the candlelit vigils. And they always have the same message: \u2018Be unified. Feel love. Don\u2019t give in to hate.\u2019 The banalities roll off the national tongue. Vapidity abounds. A shallow […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,9,11],"tags":[982,816,804,257],"class_list":["post-38653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-britain","category-law","category-religion","tag-isis","tag-manchester","tag-mourningsickness","tag-terrorism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-a3r","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38653"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38653\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38656,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38653\/revisions\/38656"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}