{"id":38569,"date":"2017-05-18T03:00:16","date_gmt":"2017-05-18T07:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=38569"},"modified":"2019-05-20T09:28:37","modified_gmt":"2019-05-20T13:28:37","slug":"if-you-subsidize-art-youll-get-more-bad-art","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2017\/05\/18\/if-you-subsidize-art-youll-get-more-bad-art\/","title":{"rendered":"If you subsidize art, you&#8217;ll get more [bad] art"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I missed this when it got posted initially &#8230; <a href=\"http:\/\/takimag.com\/article\/the_deal_of_the_art_theodore_dalrymple\/print#axzz4hFb5ilyy\" target=\"_blank\">Theodore Dalrymple<\/a> on an Irish government initiative to actually <em>audit<\/em> the art they&#8217;re busy subsidizing:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Like most governments these days, the Irish government is a patron of the arts. The problem is that most governments know as much about the arts as I know about how to select camels for a camel race.<\/p>\n<p>Naturally, therefore, governments rely on advisers to advise them on artistic matters, in effect delegating to them the disbursement of funds. Here the problem is that the art world is now so corrupt morally, intellectually, and aesthetically that the advice it gives is more likely to resemble Mr. Madoff\u2019s advice to investors than Lord Duveen\u2019s to Henry Clay Frick. There has always been bad art, of course, but rarely has it been so heavily subsidized; and when we see work of which we are inclined to ask, \u201cBut is it art?\u201d we should perhaps be asking instead, \u201cIs it government-funded?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Irish Arts Council, however, recently came up with a novel, even transgressive idea (\u201ctransgressive\u201d is the highest term of praise in current art criticism, incidentally), namely that the artists they subsidize should show some sign of artistic endeavor. It is true that the council\u2019s choice of word, audit, was an unfortunate one, as if artists were accountants having their accuracy checked; and the eminent Irish writer Colm Toibin said that the council\u2019s terminology \u2014 for example, \u201cworking artists engaged in productive practice\u201d \u2014 had a North Korean ring about it; an exaggeration, no doubt, given that the North Korean regime subjects its artists to something more severe than mere audit, but one knows what he means. These days it is increasingly difficult to distinguish, stylistically, between an official circular and a page from <em>The Selected Works of Kim Il-sung<\/em>. (The only one of those communist leaders worth reading, by the way, is Enver Hoxha, who had a wonderful natural gift for poisonous invective and insult. As by the end of his life he had fallen out with everyone, he also had a lot of practice at it; his principle was never to speak well of the dead, especially if he had killed them himself.)<\/p>\n<p>But Mr. Toibin was exercised about the very idea of demanding of artists that they actually produce something in return for the money they receive. After all, many a great artist in the past has had a fallow patch in his life, sometimes lasting decades; you can\u2019t just go to an artist and insist that he be inspired, any more than a photographer can insist that his subjects be natural in front of the lens. His logic appears to be:<\/p>\n<p><em>Great artists a and b had fallow patches<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Artist c is having a shallow patch<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Therefore artist c is great and indefinitely worth subsidy<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Now, I\u2019m not against patronage as such; sometimes I even wish I had had a patron who had relieved me of the necessity to earn my daily bread (and jam). Then, surely, I would have written an imperishable masterpiece; I would have had time for <em>le mot juste<\/em> instead of having to make do with the <em>le mot approximatif<\/em> that mere journalism, as against literature, requires. But the government doesn\u2019t have the taste or discrimination to act as patron. It can\u2019t even choose its advisers well.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I missed this when it got posted initially &#8230; Theodore Dalrymple on an Irish government initiative to actually audit the art they&#8217;re busy subsidizing: Like most governments these days, the Irish government is a patron of the arts. The problem is that most governments know as much about the arts as I know about how [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[62,28],"tags":[102,86,33,793,1289,134],"class_list":["post-38569","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-europe","category-media","tag-art","tag-criticism","tag-ireland","tag-subsidies","tag-theodoredalrymple","tag-writing"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-a25","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38569","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38569"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38569\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38570,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38569\/revisions\/38570"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}