{"id":38296,"date":"2017-04-27T05:00:57","date_gmt":"2017-04-27T09:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=38296"},"modified":"2017-04-26T18:24:04","modified_gmt":"2017-04-26T22:24:04","slug":"report-that-the-vikings-will-not-pick-up-teddy-bridgewaters-fifth-year-option","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2017\/04\/27\/report-that-the-vikings-will-not-pick-up-teddy-bridgewaters-fifth-year-option\/","title":{"rendered":"Report that the Vikings will not pick up Teddy Bridgewater&#8217;s fifth-year option"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:left; padding: 0px 10px 0px 0px\" src=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Viking_Head.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"Viking_Head\" width=\"80\" height=\"81\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-10672\" \/>In the <em>St. Paul Pioneer Press<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.twincities.com\/2017\/04\/26\/vikings-unlikely-to-pick-up-qb-teddy-bridgewaters-2018-contract-option\/\" target=\"_blank\">Chris Tomasson<\/a> says it&#8217;s unlikely that the Vikings will pick up the fifth-year option on Teddy Bridgewater&#8217;s rookie deal, potentially ending his Vikings tenure at the end of the 2017 season:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Vikings are unlikely to pick up quarterback Teddy Bridgewater\u2019s fifth-year option for 2018, but that wouldn\u2019t necessarily mean 2017 would be his final season with the team.<\/p>\n<p>ESPN first reported Wednesday that the Vikings are not expected to invoke the $12.198 million option by Tuesday\u2019s deadline. Bridgewater suffered a serious knee injury last August that has put his 2017 season is in jeopardy.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe injury guarantee makes it tough to do,\u201d a source told ESPN.<\/p>\n<p>If Minnesota declines the option, Bridgewater still could end up under contract for 2018. OvertheCap.com and NFL Media reported that if Bridgewater is on the physically unable to perform list throughout 2017, he would remain on the books for 2018 at his same base salary of $1.354 million.<\/p>\n<p>The sides could reach a deal at some point in which Bridgewater\u2019s 2018 contract figure is somewhere between $1.354 million and $12.198 million.<\/p>\n<p>Bridgewater has been with the Vikings since offseason workouts began April 17 at Winter Park. \u201cHe\u2019s been in here working as hard as anyone, fighting his way back,\u201d said general manager Rick Spielman.<\/p>\n<p>Declining Bridgewater\u2019s option would indicate that Minnesota regards Sam Bradford most likely its quarterback of the future. If so, Bradford, who will make $18 million in the final year of his deal in 2017, could be in line for an extension before the season starts.<\/p>\n<p>Bradford said Tuesday he doesn\u2019t know of any contract talks between his agent and the Vikings. Spielman said he won\u2019t comment on any player contracts.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>For the record, while I like and appreciate Sam Bradford, I&#8217;m a fully paid-up member of the Bridgewater Underground, and I really hope that Teddy will fully recover and be able to resume his career sooner rather than later. Head coach Mike Zimmer was quoted as saying &#8220;I want Teddy, I don\u2019t want him going somewhere else.&#8221; Well spoken, coach!<\/p>\n<p>At the <em>Daily Norseman<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailynorseman.com\/2017\/4\/26\/15436560\/important-point-teddy-bridgewaters-option\" target=\"_blank\">Christopher Gates<\/a> explains that there&#8217;s still a chance that Teddy&#8217;s option would be picked up &#8230; but in 2018, not this year:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Basically, when a contract is \u201ctolled,\u201d it rolls over into the next season. This means that, if Bridgewater spends the entire 2017 season on the Physically Unable to Perform list &#8230; and he\u2019d almost undoubtedly start Training Camp there, at the very least &#8230; then Teddy Bridgewater would still have one year on his contract with the Vikings when we reach the start of the 2018 league year. The Vikings would then have another chance to decide whether they wanted to pick up his fifth-year option (which would actually then be a sixth-year option) at the price of around $12 million.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps this is the plan with Bridgewater, then &#8230; to have him inactive for the entire 2017 season so that the team can make a decision on him vs. Sam Bradford at the start of the 2018 league year. There\u2019s no point in rushing him back before he\u2019s ready, and if another year off for #5 will ensure the best chance for him to come back and lead the Vikings\u2019 offense, then I absolutely wouldn\u2019t be against that sort of thing at all.<\/p>\n<p>But this new information from Ian Rapoport does help to put today\u2019s earlier news in a bit of a different perspective.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the St. Paul Pioneer Press, Chris Tomasson says it&#8217;s unlikely that the Vikings will pick up the fifth-year option on Teddy Bridgewater&#8217;s rookie deal, potentially ending his Vikings tenure at the end of the 2017 season: The Vikings are unlikely to pick up quarterback Teddy Bridgewater\u2019s fifth-year option for 2018, but that wouldn\u2019t necessarily [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[126,179,962],"class_list":["post-38296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-football","tag-minnesotavikings","tag-nfl","tag-teddybridgewater"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-9XG","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38296","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38296"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38296\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38297,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38296\/revisions\/38297"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}