{"id":37419,"date":"2017-02-25T04:00:43","date_gmt":"2017-02-25T09:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=37419"},"modified":"2017-02-24T12:19:02","modified_gmt":"2017-02-24T17:19:02","slug":"updating-the-junior-rank-structure-of-the-canadian-army","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2017\/02\/25\/updating-the-junior-rank-structure-of-the-canadian-army\/","title":{"rendered":"Updating the junior rank structure of the Canadian Army"},"content":{"rendered":"

Earlier this week, Ted Campbell<\/a> offered his suggestions on how to address some issues he notes in the lower ranks of the Canadian Army, based on both Canadian and allied armies’ experiences:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

There was always a problem with the old (1850s to 1960s) Army rank structure: there was some need to tie rank to trade, but not as tightly, many military people believe, as […] in the Canadian Armed Forces today. Some branches (corps) used to have fairly strict rules; in the old (1960s) Royal Canadian Corps of Signals, for example, the technicians, amongst the very highest paid soldiers in the whole army, could not attend the long, difficult and expensive, advanced (3rd of 4 levels) technician course until they had passed the junior leadership course and they could not attempt the senior leadership course until they had passed the advanced technician\u2019s course, and so on. But that system always excluded some good people. There were, and still are today, many people who can be excellent, even outstanding technicians but cannot lead or manage soldiers. The United States Army addressed this same issue by creating the \u201cspecialist\u201d grouping which allowed soldiers to \u201cadvance\u201d through part of the pay system ~ higher salaries for technical skills ~ but not the other ~ even higher salaries for leadership. In past years there were many different (paid) grades of specialist but now it is a “rank” equivalent to the US Army corporal for soldiers who have not yet or cannot pass the first level junior leader course. The British Royal Air Force has a similar and, in my opinion, better system \u2026<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2026 which recognizes both technical skill and leadership requirements.<\/p>\n

In my opinion we should undo much of what Mr Hellyer did, while thanking him for addressing the pay problem, and restore the junior leadership positions, especially the tank and rifle section commanders, to the real, and younger, junior leaders: those in the rank of master corporal. This will restore the senior leaders to their traditional roles as \u201cguides\u201d and mentors to the junior leaders: both to the corporals and the lieutenants. The ranks of sergeant ~ in several \u201cgrades\u201d and warrant officer are often, and very correctly, referred to as the backbone or even the \u201cheart and soul\u201d of the army. That is partly because, traditionally, they stood ever so slightly \u201caloof\u201d from the rank and file. The lieutenants gave orders, advised, coached and mentored by the sergeants, to the corporals who, then, directly led the riflemen but were also mentored by the sergeants. It was, to repeat the words I used to describe the US constitution, \u201ca fine and finely balanced system;\u201d we upset the balance 50 years ago to solve a pay problem. We should, also, adapt the RAF\u2019s aircraftman\/technician to our own needs to allow some soldiers to advance \u201cup\u201d in their technical field (and be paid more) without becoming leaders (and being paid more for that, too).<\/p>\n

To do that the Army will have to reform itself.<\/p>\n

First, it will have to repose trust in its junior leaders; that\u2019s something that will be hard to do, even after the Army, of absolute necessity, makes junior leader training ~ making privates into corporals and civilians into second lieutenants ~ its highest priority and the job it assigns to its very, very best senior leaders.<\/p>\n

Second, it will have to restore the \u201csergeant\u2019s mess\u201d to its traditional pride of place in the Army by giving the sergeants and warrant officers back the senior supervisory and management duties that have, in far too many cases, migrated \u201cupwards\u201d until they are now done by captains and even majors. Once again, it is a trust issue and we live in a world where many of the most senior leaders are timid because they have been \u201cburned\u201d too often, by their own superiors, when a subordinate makes a mistake. Mistakes are part of human nature; they have to be corrected, forgiven, in most cases, and, very often, used as teaching aids.<\/p>\n

Third, the government will need to revise the pay system so that junior leaders are paid more and, meanwhile, the gap between corporal and master corporal and sergeant is maintained.<\/p>\n

Fourth, promotions, in the Army, at least, to corporal and to captain must not be automatic. Promotion to corporal must require that one pass a very tough junior leaders course; promotion from lieutenant to captain should be by examination.<\/p>\n

But, doing these four things will, in my opinion, give the Army a firm foundation upon which to build and fight.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Earlier this week, Ted Campbell offered his suggestions on how to address some issues he notes in the lower ranks of the Canadian Army, based on both Canadian and allied armies’ experiences: There was always a problem with the old (1850s to 1960s) Army rank structure: there was some need to tie rank to trade, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,5],"tags":[31,448,572],"class_list":["post-37419","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-military","tag-army","tag-canadianforces","tag-leadership"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-9Jx","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37419"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37419\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37425,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37419\/revisions\/37425"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}