{"id":36248,"date":"2016-11-05T03:00:13","date_gmt":"2016-11-05T07:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=36248"},"modified":"2017-04-17T12:46:30","modified_gmt":"2017-04-17T16:46:30","slug":"media-madness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2016\/11\/05\/media-madness\/","title":{"rendered":"Media madness"},"content":{"rendered":"

In Vanity Fair<\/em>, Ken Stern<\/a> peers into the murky depths of the right-wing media bubble:<\/p>\n

Virtually every day during the past year, I\u2019ve digested a daily dose of Breitbart<\/em>, the alt-right Web site that many journalists, including myself, have described as \u201cTrump Pravda.\u201d A typical day on Breitbart<\/em> includes any number of articles extolling the rise of Donald Trump, including the massive size of his rallies and (on and off) his fast-rising poll numbers. There are also several pieces attacking the \u201cmainstream media,\u201d usually CNN, The New York Times<\/em> or The Washington Post<\/em>. Recently, there have been a slew of pieces from the Clinton WikiLeaks cache, which are part of a larger set of articles showcasing the couple\u2019s venality, arrogance, and sexual peccadillos. The reporting, such as it is, is generally factually accurate, but mean-spirited and fantastically one-sided. If Breitbart<\/em> were your primary news source, you would receive a view of the election that would be largely distorted and wholly unrecognizable to swaths of the American public.<\/p>\n

When I checked the news the other day, it was more of the same. I counted some 20 articles about the presidential race, each espousing the unequivocal view that one candidate is collapsing due to moral failings, financial improprieties, and complete and utter lack of judgment and ethics. Notably, I was not reading Breitbart<\/em>. Instead, I was reading The Washington Post<\/em>, delivered to my doorstep, and the attacks were squarely waged not against the Clintons but rather against Trump.<\/p>\n

In the Front Section, there was an incredible array of Trump-phobia, ranging from attacks on his business acuity to his ethics (\u201cHow Trump got a personal tax break by defaulting on loans\u201d), to his personal knowledge (\u201cTrump\u2019s map of black America needs an update\u201d), to stupid opinions about Trump (\u201cNader predicts fastest impeachment in history for a President Trump\u201d), to smart opinions about Trump (\u201cA contemptible candidate \u2014 and the party to blame for it\u201d).<\/p>\n

If you think this is limited to the National News portion of the paper, you would be mistaken. The Metro section, which typically reports on the Washington, D.C. area, was headlined by a news article describing the dysfunction at the Trump campaign in Virginia and a column arguing that Trump watching should be rated R for children. The top article in the Style section sported a massive feature on the Trump meltdown, supplemented by a column attacking Steve Bannon, the C.E.O. of the Trump campaign and the former head honcho at Breitbart<\/em>. The sports section featured a column attacking Trump and defending, of all things, locker-room culture. Only the Health section lacked a Trump hook. (Trump, as you may recall, temporarily banned WaPo reporters from his campaign events.)<\/p>\n

Rather remarkably, there was virtually no mention of Clinton or any other candidate running for president on this particular day. And so I repeated this little thought experiment again last week and the results were largely the same. The Post<\/em> should not be blamed for criticizing a candidate who has demonstrated xenophobic, racist, and sexually predatory behavior. But even at the end of perhaps the worst stretch of weeks for a candidate in modern American electoral history, perhaps 45 percent of the electorate, some 55 million voters or so, still will vote for Trump. And some of them may wonder if the Post<\/em> put their fat thumbs on the electoral scales. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In Vanity Fair, Ken Stern peers into the murky depths of the right-wing media bubble: Virtually every day during the past year, I\u2019ve digested a daily dose of Breitbart, the alt-right Web site that many journalists, including myself, have described as \u201cTrump Pravda.\u201d A typical day on Breitbart includes any number of articles extolling the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,53,13],"tags":[1037,188,670,477,213,101,1122],"class_list":["post-36248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-politics","category-usa","tag-donaldtrump","tag-electionwatch","tag-hillaryclinton","tag-magazines","tag-newspapers","tag-tv","tag-xenophobia"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-9qE","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36248"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36248\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36249,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36248\/revisions\/36249"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}