{"id":36178,"date":"2016-10-24T02:00:07","date_gmt":"2016-10-24T06:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=36178"},"modified":"2016-10-22T09:32:09","modified_gmt":"2016-10-22T13:32:09","slug":"the-logic-of-hate-crime-legislation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2016\/10\/24\/the-logic-of-hate-crime-legislation\/","title":{"rendered":"The “logic” of hate crime legislation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Julie Burchill<\/a> wonders why we enshrine in law the repulsive notion that some lives are more important than others:<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve always been somewhat bemused by the concept of \u2018hate crime\u2019 \u2013 a phrase which first came into use in the US in the 1980s and into practice in the UK in 1998<\/a>. I must say that the idea that it is somehow worse to beat up or kill someone because you object to their race or religion, than because you\u2019re a nasty piece of work who felt like beating up or killing someone, strikes me as quite extraordinary \u2013 hateful, even, implying that some lives are worth more than others. Are we not all human, do we not all bleed? If we\u2019re murdered, do not those who love us grieve for us equally? Why, then, are attacks on some thought to be worse than attacks on others? Indeed, the book Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and Identity Politics<\/em> claims that hate crime legislation may exacerbate conflict, upholding the idea that crimes are committed by members of groups rather than by individuals, thereby inflaming intolerance between different ethnic communities.<\/p>\n

Nevertheless, in a dark twist on Alice In Wonderland\u2019s all-must-have-prizes shtick, gay people were added soon afterwards. Then, obviously realising that it was somewhat stupid to deem an attack on a big strapping man who was more than capable of standing up for himself worse than an attack on a frail, heterosexual OAP, the elderly were added in 2007<\/a> to the list of people who it\u2019s especially bad to attack or kill. This being the case, quite understandably the disabled were soon eligible to be victims of hate crime, too.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s very easy for me to be offensive about anything, so I\u2019ll tread very carefully here. I do think that there is something particularly vile about picking on those with far less chance of fighting back and that those who do it should be dealt with particularly harshly. On the other hand, I don\u2019t think that \u2018hate\u2019 usually comes into attacks on the elderly and the disabled, or on children \u2013 simply the very unpleasant fact that sadists, cowards and bullies know they are easy targets. In fact, they probably like this about them.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s also quite hard for me to understand how those who claim, and have their champions claim, to be the most chronic and vulnerable victims of hate crimes are Muslims. If you visited this country from another planet, all the ceaseless clatter about hate crimes of the Islamophobic kind might have you believing that a brace of Muslims a week were being butchered in the street due to the sheer molten hatred of the blood-thirsty Christian community. Whereas, in fact, Islamist terrorism kills eight times more<\/a> Muslims than non-Muslims. In this country, three Muslims have been killed for being Muslims over the past three years \u2013 all by other Muslims.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Julie Burchill wonders why we enshrine in law the repulsive notion that some lives are more important than others: I\u2019ve always been somewhat bemused by the concept of \u2018hate crime\u2019 \u2013 a phrase which first came into use in the US in the 1980s and into practice in the UK in 1998. I must say […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,9,11],"tags":[343,47,196,355,99],"class_list":["post-36178","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-britain","category-law","category-religion","tag-crimeandpunishment","tag-islam","tag-lgbt","tag-prejudice","tag-racism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-9pw","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36178"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36178\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36181,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36178\/revisions\/36181"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}