{"id":3611,"date":"2010-04-30T09:41:54","date_gmt":"2010-04-30T13:41:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=3611"},"modified":"2010-04-30T09:41:54","modified_gmt":"2010-04-30T13:41:54","slug":"training-to-fight-lower-tech-aircraft-in-the-air","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2010\/04\/30\/training-to-fight-lower-tech-aircraft-in-the-air\/","title":{"rendered":"Training to fight lower-tech aircraft in the air"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.strategypage.com\/htmw\/htairfo\/articles\/20100429.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">Strategy Page<\/a> rounds up information on US Navy efforts to keep their air-to-air combat skills fresh:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The U.S. Navy has refurbished a surplus U.S. Air Force National Guard F-16 flight simulator to help keep its F-16 pilots in shape for using F-16s to train navy pilots (in F-18s) how to best deal with Chinese, and other potential enemy, pilots. The navy uses F-16s because these aircraft are best able to replicate the performance of likely high end enemy fighters. That&#8217;s because Russia and China have used the F-16 as the model for most of their latest fighters (the Russian MiG-29 and Chinese J-10). The navy bought 26 of a special model (F-16N) of the aircraft in the late 1980s. But in the 1990s, the navy retired its F-16Ns, because of metal fatigue, and had to wait nearly a decade before it got sixteen more. The refurbished simulator had its cockpit modified to reflect the one the navy F-16s use.<\/p>\n<p>The navy also uses F-5s to simulate lower performance enemy fighters. Two years ago, the navy completed a six year effort to buy and modify 44 F-5E fighters from Switzerland. The U.S. uses F-5s, a 12 ton fighter roughly similar to the MiG-21. The F-5 is normally armed with two 20mm cannon, and three tons of missiles and bombs. The U.S. Navy modified and refurbished the Swiss F-5s so their performance better matched that of Russian or Chinese aircraft.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>It may sound odd to have older equipment still in service, but they are very useful for training purposes. Both the air force and the army will perform better if they&#8217;ve trained <em>against<\/em> the kind of equipment and tactics used by likely opponents, and it&#8217;s unlikely that you can arrange a &#8220;friendly&#8221; wargame exercise against a force you may be fighting for real in the near future.<\/p>\n<p>The other thing is that the troops playing the &#8220;other side&#8221; in wargame exercises tend to have a lot more fun doing so . . .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Strategy Page rounds up information on US Navy efforts to keep their air-to-air combat skills fresh: The U.S. Navy has refurbished a surplus U.S. Air Force National Guard F-16 flight simulator to help keep its F-16 pilots in shape for using F-16s to train navy pilots (in F-18s) how to best deal with Chinese, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,13],"tags":[123,145,555,556,30],"class_list":["post-3611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-military","category-usa","tag-aircraft","tag-airforce","tag-f-16","tag-f-18","tag-navy"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-Wf","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3611"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3611\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3612,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3611\/revisions\/3612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}